green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“a likelihood of future violations may be inferred from past unlawful conduct.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. U. S. Metals Depository Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
a likelihood of future violations may be inferred from past unlawful conduct.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael K. Hebeka
See United States v. Beasley, 550 F.2d 261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commodity Exchange, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
See generally British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 486 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977). 5 . 40 Fed.Reg. 33,854 (1975). 6 . 7 U.S.C. § 7a(12) (1980). 7 . 17 C.F.R. § 1.53 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
First Commodity Corp. Of Boston and Richard Badoian v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and John Ruddy
See generally British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482 , 484r-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
B at 4; see British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 484-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977); Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Crown Colony Commodity Options, Ltd., 434 F.Supp. 911, 913-19 (1977). 10 . 42 Fed.Reg. 18246 (April 5, 1977). 11 . 42 Fed.Reg. 55538 (Oct. 17, 1977). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel International Corp. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
See British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 489 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977) (failure of Commodity Future Trading Commission to publish rules 30 days before effective date, as specified in § 553(d), will not invalidate rules where Commission had good cause for accelerating the effective date, especially where plaintiff made no showing of prejudice).
discussed
Cited "see"
9 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2102, 1981 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 25,595 Daniel International Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the Secretary of Labor
See British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 489 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977) (failure of Commodity Future Trading Commission to publish rules 30 days before effective date, as specified in § 553(d), will not invalidate rules where Commission had good cause for accelerating the effective date, especially where plaintiff made no showing of prejudice).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rowell v. Andrus
See Capital Cities Communication, Inc. v. F.C.C., 554 F.2d 1135, 1139 (D.C.Cir. 1976). 19 The Government also relies on the decisions in British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482 (2d Cir.). cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 and Chrysler Corp. v. Department of Transportation, 515 F.2d 1053 (6th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Lloyd Carr & Co., Lloyd Carr Financial Co., James A. Carr and Charles P. Lemieux III v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
See British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commission Futures Trading Commission v. American Board of Trade, Inc.
Reg. 16153 , 16155 (Apr. 17, 1978); see also British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 486-87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977), adopted a regulation banning transactions in commodity options: (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Part 32, it shall be unlawful on and after June 1, 1978, until further rule, regulation or order of the Commission, for any person to solicit or accept orders for, or to accept money, securities or property in connection with, the purchase or sale of any commodity option, or to supervise any…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. The American Board Of Trade, Inc.
II 1978). 37 In 1978, the Commission, persuaded that its attempts at less restrictive regulation had failed because "the offer and sale of commodity options has for some time been and remains permeated with fraud and other illegal or unsound practices," 43 Fed.Reg. 16153, 16155 (Apr. 17, 1978); see also British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, 552 F.2d 482, 486-87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977), adopted a regulation banning transactions in commodity options: 38 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Part 32, it shall be unlawful…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Premex, Inc., and Samuel Zack
Compare British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagiey, 552 F.2d 482 , 486-87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard P. Herman, United States of America v. James J. McCann in No. 78-1282
(2×)
See e. g., United States v. Beasley, 550 F.2d 261, 268 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 427 , 54 L.Ed.2d 297 (1977); United States v. Bautista, 509 F.2d 675 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); United States v. Smith, 542 F.2d 711 (7th Cir. 1976); In re Kilgo, 484 F.2d 1215 (4th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brickhouse
v.
Zahradnick, Penitentiary Superintendent
v.
Zahradnick, Penitentiary Superintendent
No. 76-6982.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.