green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
(2×)
But see Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1190-92 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) (plurality opinion) (indictment precludes liability), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978); Gar mon v. Lumpkin County, 878 F.2d 1406 , 1409 & n. 2 (11th Cir.1989) (citing Rodriguez). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Straughter, Genell Brown, Ladonna Thornton
See United States v. McManus, 560 F.2d 747, 751 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Bertman Ames and Gloria Ames v. United States
See Rodriguez *186 v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1193 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978); cf. Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167, 192-93 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Higdon
United States v. Lloyd, 400 F.2d 414, 416 (6th Cir.1968); United States v. Sharp, 778 F.2d 1182 , 1186 n. 5 (6th Cir.1985) (noting that disclosure is usually required when an informant is an “active participant in the events underlying the defendant’s potential criminal liability” and usually not required when the informant is a “mere tipster or introducer”); see, e.g., United States v. McManus, 560 F.2d 747, 751 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978) (affirming the denial of ' disclosure when the informant was not a direct participant in t…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S. Ct. 894 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waskey v. Municipality of Anchorage
See also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978) (no federal common law tort of negligent investigation); Landeros v. *345 City of Tucson, 171 Ariz. 474 , 831 P.2d 850 (1992); Johnson v. City of Pacifica, 4 Cal.App.3d 82 , 84 Cal.Rptr. 246 (1970); Montgomery Ward Co. v. Pherson, 129 Colo. 502 , 272 P.2d 643 (1954); Wimer v. State, 122 Idaho 923 , 841 P.2d 453 (1993); and Bromund v. Holt, 24 Wis.2d 336 , 129 N.W.2d 149 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garmon v. Lumpkin County
See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1191 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) ("an indictment by a properly constituted grand jury conclusively determines the existence of probable cause and provide the authority for an arrest warrant to issue"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garmon v. Lumpkin County
See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1191 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) ("an indictment by a properly constituted grand jury conclusively determines the existence of probable cause and provide the authority for an arrest warrant to issue”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Scott County Master Docket
Ames, 600 F.2d at 185 ; see also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1195 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) (Hill, J. concurring), 4 cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978) (officer who maliciously seeks an indictment is not shielded from liability simply by obtaining it).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez
v.
Ritchey
v.
Ritchey
No. 77-5449.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.