green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
American Employers' Insurance v. Delorme Publishing Co.
See International Communication Materials, Inc. v. Employer’s Insur. of Wausau, 1996 WL 1044552 , * (W.D.Pa.) (citing Big O’ Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 408 F.Supp. 1219, 1241 (D.C.Colo.1976), modified, 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978)).
cited
Cited "see"
National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. American Cinema Editors, Inc.
See Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1372 , 195 USPQ 417 , 423 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(2×)
See Big O Tire Dealers v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 561 F.2d 1365, 1369 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978). 22.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunward Corporation v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
See generally Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 408 F.Supp. 1219 (D.Colo.1976), modified, 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
See generally Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 408 F.Supp. 1219 (D.Colo. 1976) , modified, 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir. 1977) , cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Messerlian
See United States v. Dansker, 565 F.2d 1262, 1264 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978); Government of the Virgin Islands v. Martinez, 780 F.2d 302, 306-08 (3d Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.
See Big O Tire Dealers v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Plus Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc.
See Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1371-72 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978); Callman at Sec. 21.09. 13 There are a few added wrinkles to this case.
cited
Cited "see"
Plus Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc.
See Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1371-72 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978); Callman at § 21.09.
cited
Cited "see"
Plus Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc.
See Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1371-72 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wolczik
See United States v. Dansker, 565 F.2d 1262 (3rd Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Schreiber
(2×)
See United States v. Dansker, 565 F.2d 1262, 1266-67 (3d Cir. 1977), Cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978). 1 7 It is against the plain error standard that we examine the specific argument of the appellant a broad based contention that the trial judge was required to disqualify himself because he was plainly not an impartial jurist as required by 28 U.S.C. § 455 : 8 (a) Any justice, judge, magistrate, or referee in bankruptcy of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. 9 (b) He shall …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sunenblick v. Harrell
See, e.g., Big O Tire Deal *626 ers v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 408 F.Supp. 1219 (D.Colo.1976), modified, 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Money Centers, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Universal Bank
(2×)
See Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. Quaker Oats Co., 978 F.2d 947, 958 (7th Cir.1992) (noting that several circuits have found reverse confusion to be a valid basis for a trademark infringement claim under the Lanham Act), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1879 , 123 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993); see also Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1371-72 (10th Cir.1977) (establishing the doctrine of "reverse confusion"), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978). 10 The following factors are considered in determining whether there is a likelihood…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vastola
United States v. Higgs, 713 F.2d 39, 44 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1048 , 104 S.Ct. 725 , 79 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984); see also United States v. Dansker, 565 *1267 F.2d 1262, 1264 (3d Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978) (where the credibility of a key witness was placed in question by written affidavits, an evidentiary hearing should be conducted to determine if Brady material was being withheld).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
See, e.g., Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365, 1371-72 (10th Cir.1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 1052 , 98 S.Ct. 905 , 54 L.Ed.2d 805 (1978); Plus *965 Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc., 722 F.2d 999, 1003-04 (2d Cir.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dansker
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1978.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.