green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1985 ·
…the motion for judgment n.o.v. may be granted only when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the proper judgment
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dunn v. Buncome Public Water District
the consent requirement of 216(b), ... is apposite solely to representative actions
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
William P. Tavoulareas, Peter Tavoulareas v. Philip Piro. William P. Tavoulareas, Peter Tavoulareas v. The Washington Post Company, D/B/A the Washington Post, a Delaware Corporation
the motion for judgment n.o.v. may be granted only when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the proper judgment
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tavoulareas v. Piro
the motion for judgment n.o.v. may be granted only when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the proper judgment
cited
Cited "see"
Szymula v. Ash Grove Cement Co.
He or she is the named plaintiff.” Id. at 1135 ; accord Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
See Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir.1978) (noting that 29 U.S.C.A. § 256 is not applicable to age discrimination suits because Congress did not incorporate it into ADEA), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Western District Xerox Litigation
See Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir.1978), cert, denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); Sperling, 145 F.R.D. at 360 (D.N.J.1992); Mooney v. Aramco Services Co., 764 F.Supp. 461, 463 (S.D.Tex.1991); Vivone v. Acme Markets, Inc., 687 F.Supp. 168, 169 (E.D.Pa.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
John Dewitt McDowell v. R.R. Rogers, D.E. Ross, and R.L. Martin
See Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1104 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rafael Rivera Fernandez v. Carlos Chardon, Etc., Juan Fumero Soto, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Carlos Chardon, Etc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
One of the cases cited stands essentially for the Ricks rule of accrual rather than for plaintiffs' asserted rule, NLRB v. California School of Professional Psychology, 583 F.2d 1099, 1101-02 (9th Cir. 1978) (applying § 10(b) of National Labor Relations Act); accord, Nazareth Regional High School v. NLRB, 549 F.2d 873, 882 (2d Cir. 1977), three cited cases stand equally well for the Ricks rule as for plaintiffs' rule, Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (Age Discrimination in Employment Act); Payne v. C…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fernandez v. Chardon
One of the cases cited stands essentially for the Ricks rule of accrual rather than for plaintiffs’ asserted rule, NLRB v. California School of Professional Psychology, 583 F.2d 1099, 1101-02 (9th Cir. 1978) (applying § 10(b) of National Labor Relations Act); accord, Nazareth Regional High School v. NLRB, 549 F.2d 873, 882 (2d Cir. 1977), three cited cases, stand equally well for the Ricks rule as for plaintiffs’ rule, Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (Age Discrimination in Employment Act); Payne…
cited
Cited "see"
Jamison v. Storer Broadcasting Co.
See Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. GILBARCO, INC., Appellee
(2×)
See Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
Levine v. Bryant, 700 F.Supp. 949, 953 (N.D.Ill.1988) (“Congress did not intend for section 256 to apply to the ADEA.”); Mooney, 764 F.Supp. at 462 (“The application of § 256 is refuted by the clear language of the ADEA”); see also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir.1978) (“Section 256 is not incorporated by reference into the ADEA, and therefore we fail to see how it could be applicable to age discrimination suits.”) (dictum), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
See also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096 , (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Portage II and Portage IV v. Bryant Petroleum Corp., Dr. Clarke N. Simm
See also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1104 (6th Cir.1978) (“[Ejvidence must be viewed in light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made, drawing from that evidence all reasonable inferences in his favor.”), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Max D. Erskine v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096 , 1104 & n. 10 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); Kerwood v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n of America, Inc., 494 F.Supp. 1298 (D.D.C.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ned WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the EATON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096 , 1104 & n. 10 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); Kerwood v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n of America, Inc., 494 F.Supp. 1298 (D.D.C.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John A. Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
See, e.g., Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1103 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); Mitchell v. Mace Produce Co., 163 F.Supp. 342, 346 (D.Md.1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hospital Affiliates International, Inc. v. Schweiker
The standard for deciding whether to direct a verdict is: “[Wjhether the evidence is such that, without weighing the credibility of the witnesses or otherwise considering the weight of the evidence, there can be but one conclusion as to the verdict that reasonable men could have reached.” Simblest v. Maynard, 427 F.2d 1, 4 (2nd Cir. 1970); see also Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1105 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. den., 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1995 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morelock
v.
NCR Corp.
v.
NCR Corp.
No. 78-1230.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2) · S.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 6th
Cir. Certiorari denied.