Ledwell v. Berry, 254 S.E.2d 35 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Ledwell v. Berry, 254 S.E.2d 35 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 · …we believe it is less than realistic to hold that the problem of automobile accidents is not sufficiently large to acquire a uniqueness of its own. ⚠ not in text
33 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lee Ex Rel. Schlosser v. Mowett Sales Co. (ncctapp, 1985-09-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Lee Ex Rel. Schlosser v. Mowett Sales Co. (4×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1985 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
we believe it is less than realistic to hold that the problem of automobile accidents is not sufficiently large to acquire a uniqueness of its own.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phyllis Harper LEDWELL and American Motorists Insurance Company
v.
Phillip Bernard BERRY, By his Guardian Ad Litem, Robert A. Brinson.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 5, 1979.
254 S.E.2d 35
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 87%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (4)

Tuggle, Duggins, Meschan, Thornton, & Elrod, for plaintiffs.

Tate & Bretzmann, for defendant.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under GS 7A-31. 39 N.C.App. 224, 249 S.E.2d 862. (7718SC976). Denied.