Stephenson v. Bartlett, 635 S.E.2d 59 (N.C. 2006). · Go Syfert
Stephenson v. Bartlett, 635 S.E.2d 59 (N.C. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ehrenhaus v. Baker (ncctapp, 2015-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ehrenhaus v. Baker
N.C. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stephenson v. Bartlett, 177 N.C.App. 239 , 245, 628 S.E.2d 442 , 446 (explaining that common fund doctrine "has no application ... [where] there is no common fund resulting from the litigation"), disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 544 , 635 S.E.2d 59 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" In Re LB
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re S.W., 175 N.C.App. 719, 724 , 625 S.E.2d 594, 597 ("[W]e hold that the remaining findings of fact are more than sufficient to support the trial court's conclusions of law complained of by respondent."), disc. rev. denied, 360 N.C. 534 , 635 S.E.2d 59 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" In re L.B.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re S.W., 175 N.C.App. 719 , 724, 625 S.E.2d 594 , 597 ("[W]e hold that the remaining findings of fact are more than sufficient to support the trial court's conclusions of law complained of by respondent."), disc. rev. denied, 360 N.C. 534 , 635 S.E.2d 59 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" In the D.J.G.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re S.W., 175 N.C.App. 719 , 722, 625 S.E.2d 594 , 596 (holding respondent must show prejudice to obtain reversal following an untimely termination of parental rights hearing), disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 534 , 635 S.E.2d 59 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Djg
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re S.W., 175 N.C.App. 719, 722 , 625 S.E.2d 594, 596 (holding respondent must show prejudice to obtain reversal following an untimely termination of parental rights hearing), disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 534 , 635 S.E.2d 59 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ashley STEPHENSON
v.
Gary O. BARTLETT
No. 94P02-5..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 29, 2006.
635 S.E.2d 59
Thomas A. Farr, Phillip J. Strach, Charles B. Neely, Jr., Raleigh, Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Greensboro, for Stephenson, et al., Tiare B. Smiley, Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for Bartlett, et al.
Martin.
Published

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 5th day of June 2006 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Justice MARTIN recused.