green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.4 score
“it is obvious that one may infringe a patent if he employs an agent for that purpose or has the offending articles manufactured for him by an independent contractor.”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Collegenet, Inc. v. XAP CORP.
it is obvious that one may infringe a patent if he employs an agent for that purpose or has the offending articles manufactured for him by an independent contractor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.
Accord, Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 143 F.2d 1003 (9 C.A.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 760 , 65 S.Ct. 93 , 89 L.Ed. 608 (1944); Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc., 137 F.2d 68 (3 C.A.1943); Eastman Kodak Co. v. Velveray Corp., 175 F.Supp. 646 (S.D.N.Y.1959); E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See also Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 143 F.2d 1003, 1004 (9th Cir.) (“It is obvious that one may infringe a patent if he employ an agent for that purpose or have the offending articles manufactured for him by an independent contractor.”), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 760 , 65 S.Ct. 93 , 89 L.Ed. 608 (1944); Metal Film Co., Inc. v. Metlon Corp., 316 F.Supp. 96 , 110 n. 12 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (“That defendants choose to have the vacuum metallizing, which was a conventional step ..., done by outside suppliers does not mitigate their infringement of the overall process.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roschek
v.
Williamson
v.
Williamson
No. 437.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 23, 1944.
Mr. Eli F. Seebirt and Orlo R. Deahl for petitioner., Mr. Shepard J. Crumpacker for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: D. Oregon (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.