green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ankney v. Franch
See Benoni v. Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, 188 Md. 306, 308-09 , 52 A.2d 613 , appeal dismissed, 332 U.S. 749 , 68 S.Ct. 86 , 92 L.Ed. 336 (1947) (addressing the scope of an appeal under art. 101, § 56).
examined
Cited "see"
Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 167-68 , 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2922 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976). .At the time of petitioner’s trial, it had “been indicated, although not decided, that(, under Georgia law,] a prosecutor may make an agreement to forgo prosecution only with the approval of the court." State v. Hanson, 249 Ga. 739 , 295 S.E.2d 297, 303 (1982); see abo Smith v.. State, 74 Ga.App. 777 , 41 S.E.2d 541, 546-48 (dictum), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 86 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Possible Participation by the United States in Islamic Republic of Iran v. Pahlavi
See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres, 163 F.2d 246 (2d Cir. 1947), cert, denied, 332 U.S. 772 (1947); Bernstein v. TV.
discussed
Cited "see"
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farr
It may be noted, also, that the Supreme Court expressly declined to pass on the so-called Bernstein exception to the act of state doctrine predicated upon a letter from the Acting Legal Advisor to the State Department written for the purpose of relieving the court from any constraint upon the exercise of its jurisdiction to pass on the validity of the foreign decree involved in that case. 376 U.S. at 420 , 84 S.Ct. 923 ; see Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 163 F.2d 246 (2 Cir.), cert. den., 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947); Bernstein v. N. V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miguel Pons v. Republic of Cuba
(2×)
See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres S.A., 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 246, 249 , certiorari denied 1947, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 . 10 But I do not think we should carry the act of state doctrine to the point where we permit a foreign state to come into our courts as a suitor and secure equitable relief on better or different terms than those available to an American litigant in the same courts. 11 Cuba here sought the extraordinary equitable relief of an injunction and an accounting from Pons who, as an agent of Cuba, held property of that country.
cited
Cited "see"
Kane v. National Institute of Agrarian Reform
See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres S.A., 2 Cir., 163 Fed. 2d 246, cert. den. 332 U.S. 772 .
cited
Cited "see"
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino
See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres S. A., 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 246 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Italy v. De Angelis
(2×)
See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 246 , certiorari denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Iraq Ex Rel. Citizens of the Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG
(2×)
A foreign government's actions are attributed to the 5 state regardless of whether they are "legal under the municipal law of the foreign state," Banco de 6 Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 114 F.2d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 1940); see, e.g., Bernstein 7 v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 163 F.2d 246, 248-49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 772 8 (1947); Westfield v. Federal Republic of Germany, 633 F.3d 409, 418 (6th Cir. 2011), and whether 9 they "are done by the authority of a de jure or titular, or of a de facto, government," Underhill v. 10 Hernandez, 65 F. 577, 582 (2d Cir. 1895…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FILMS BY JOVE, INC. v. Berov
See id. *207 (“since the act of state doctrine prohibits inquiry into the legality of official governmental acts, such acts surely cannot be official only if they are legal”); see also Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres S.A., 163 F.2d 246, 249-50 (2d Cir.1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947) (rejecting attack on Nazi confiscations based on failure to comply with German law); Banco de Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 114 F.2d 438, 443 (2d Cir.1940) (noting that the courts of this country will not examine the acts of a foreign sovereign within its bord…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, Imelda R. Marcos, Ramon Azurin, Diosdado C. Ordonez and Ancor Holdings, N.V.
(2×)
See also Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres S.A., 163 F.2d 246, 249-50 (2d Cir.) (rejecting attack on Nazi confiscation based on failure to comply with German law), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947). 10 54 Plaintiff argues, however, that Mr. Marcos' actions were not the sovereign acts of the Philippines because they were not authorized by Philippine law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedro Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, Maria Cristina Vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See also Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres, S.A., 163 F.2d 246, 252 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947); Restatement, Foreign Relations Law of the United States 44 (Proposed Official Draft, 1962); Kane v. National Institute of Agrarian Roform, No. 61 L. 730 , June 8, 1961 (Fla. Cir.Ct.) (18 Fla.Supp. 116); Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on international Law, Report, A Reconsideration of the Act of State Doctrine in United States Courts 13 (May 1959); Zander, The Act of State Doctrine, 53 Am.J.Int'l L. 826 (1959)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino
See also Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres, S. A., 163 F.2d 246, 252 (2 Cir.), cert denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947); Restatement, Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 44 (Proposed Official Draft, 1962); Kane v. National Institute of Agrarian Reform, (Fla.Cir.Ct.) 18 Fla.Supp. 116; Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on International Law, Report, A Reconsideration of the Act of State Doctrine in United States Courts 13 (May 1959); Zander, The Act of State Doctrine, 53 Am.J.Int’l L. 826 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino
See also Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres, S.A., 163 F.2d 246, 252 (2 Cir.), cert denied, 332 U.S. 772 , 68 S.Ct. 88 , 92 L.Ed. 357 (1947); Restatement, Foreign Relations Law of the United States 44 (Proposed Official Draft, 1962); Kane v. National Institute of Agrarian Reform, (Fla.Cir.Ct) 18 Fla.Supp. 116; Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on International Law, Report, A Reconsideration of the Act of State Doctrine in United States Courts 13 (May 1959); Zander, The Act of State Doctrine, 53 Am.J.Int'l L. 826 (1959). 48 This exception is applicable to the case before us…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 271.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1947.
George G. Finch and G. Seals Aiken for petitioner., Reported below: 74 Ga. App. 777,41S.E. 2d 541.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Certiorari denied.