green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1975 ·
…if the commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the commission should justify it on the record.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1975 ·
…where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Barber
where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Barber
where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Tenneco Oil Company, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Exxon Corporation, Intervenors. American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Intervenors
if the commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the commission should justify it on the record.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission
if the commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the commission should justify it on the record.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Abraham Minker, Also Known as Abe Minker
Schauffler v. United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing Industry, Local 420, 230 F.2d 572, 576 (C.A.3), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 825 , 77 S.Ct. 37 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 *635 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Shoe Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See Dart Export Corp. v. United States, 43 CCPA 64, 74, C.A.D. 610, 1956 WL 8339 (holding Customs' acceptance of estimated duties tendered did not constitute decision), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); Best Foods, Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust.Ct. 1 , 9-10, 147 F.Supp. 749, 756-57 (1956) (holding payment of customs duties at time of entry not decision for purpose of computing time to file protest).
discussed
Cited "see"
TETERS FLORAL PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. United States
See Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 318 , 53 S.Ct. 350, 359 , 77 L.Ed. 796 (1933) and Dart Export Corp. v. United States, 43 C.C.P.A. 64, 74-76 (1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Memphis Light, Gas And Water Division v. Federal Power Commission
See United Fuel Gas Co., 31 FPC 1342, 1353 (1964); see generally Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 13 FPC 53 (1954), reversed on other grounds sub nom., City of Detroit, Michigan v. FPC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 230 F.2d 810 (1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 829 , 77 S.Ct. 34 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956). 18 12 Since exhaustion of natural resources has always been an articulated factor in depreciation calculation, and has been utilized in the past in specific factual situations where the Commission thought it appropriate, we do not accept petitioner's characterization of the Commission Order here as revolut…
discussed
Cited "see"
Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Federal Power Commission
See United Fuel Gas Co., 31 FPC 1342, 1353 (1964); see generally Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 13 FPC 53 (1954), reversed on other grounds sub nom., City of Detroit, Michigan v. FPC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 230 F.2d 810 (1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 829 , 77 S.Ct. 34 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956). 18 Since exhaustion of natural resources has always been an articulated factor in depreciation calculation, and has been utilized in the past in specific factual situations where the Commission thought it appropriate, we do not accept petitioner’s characterization of the Commission Order here as revoluti…
discussed
Cited "see"
Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, Nlrb v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 10, Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, Nlrb v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70, Ibtcwha, and James R. Muniz, Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, Nlrb v. San Francisco Typographical Union Local No. 21, Etc., Defendants
See Schauffler v. United Association of Journeymen, 230 F.2d 572 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 825 , 77 S.Ct. 37 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); NLRB v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, 193 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1952). 23 Although the authorities cited pertain principally to civil contempts we hold to the view that the jurisdiction of the district courts to enforce their orders made under section 10(l) of the Act applies as well to criminal contempts, and that a jury trial is not compelled by virtue of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3692. 24 Having thus concluded, it remains necessary to consider appellants' con…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 10
See Schauffler v. United Association of Journeymen, 230 F.2d 572 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 825 , 77 S.Ct. 37 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); NLRB v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, 193 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Camp Wolters Enterprises v. Commissioner , 230 F.2d 555 (C.A. 5, 1956), affirming 22 T.C. 737 (1954) , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 826 (1956) .
cited
Cited "see"
Hayman v. Commissioner
See Camp Wolters Enterprises, Inc., 22 T.C. 737 , 755 , aff'd 230 F. 2d 555 , cert. den. 352 U.S. 826 .
discussed
Cited "see"
J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant
See, for example, Liddon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 230 F.2d 304 (6 Cir. 1956), cert. den., 352 U. S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 34 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); Pebble Springs Distilling Co., 23 T.C. 196 (1954), aff’d, Pebble Springs Distilling Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 231 F.2d 288 (7 Cir. 1956), cert. den., 352 U.S. 836 , 77 S.Ct. 56 , 1 L.Ed.2d 55 (1956). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. E. Smothers and Doris Smothers v. United States
See, e. g., Liddon v. Commissioner, 6 Cir. 1956, 230 F.2d 304 , cert. denied, 1956, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 34 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 ; Becher v. Commissioner, 2 Cir. 1955, 221 F.2d 252 ; Lewis v. Commissioner, 1 Cir. 1949, 176 F.2d 646 ; Bard-Parker Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir. 1954, 218 F.2d 52 , cert. denied, 1955, 349 U.S. 906 , 75 S.Ct. 582 , 99 L.Ed. 1242 ; Survaunt v. Commissioner, 8 Cir. 1947, 162 F.2d 753 ; Pebble Springs Distilling Co. v. Commissioner, 7 Cir. 1956, 231 F.2d 288 , cert. denied, 1956, 352 U.S. 836 , 77 S.Ct. 56 , 1 L.Ed.2d 55 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citizens TV Protest Committee v. Federal Communications Commission
Compare City of Detroit, Michigan v. Federal Power Comm., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 230 F.2d 810 (1955), cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. City of Detroit, Mich., 352 U.S. 829 , 77 S.Ct. 34 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); see note 35 supra.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zimmer v. California Company
See also Ford Motor Company v. Tom-linson, 6 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 873 , cer-tiorari denied, 352 U.S. 826 , 77 S.Ct. 38 , 1 L.Ed.2d 49 ; Creasy v. Ohio Power Company, 6 Cir., 1957, 248 F.2d 745, 748 ; Coggins v. Hanchette, Cal.App.1959, 331 P.2d 751 ; Scheiber v. Grigsby, 1947, 28 Wash.2d 322 , 182 P.2d 745 . 19 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rosenblum, Trustees
v.
Neisner Bros., Inc.
v.
Neisner Bros., Inc.
No. 112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Samuel Morgan for petitioners. Frank G. Marshall for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2) · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.