green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Spizz v. Eluz
DePerno, 18 F.3d at 182-83 ; see Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299, 302 (2d Cir.) (Frank, J.) (“[O]nce a cestui shows a breach of such a duty and prima facie proof of a maximum amount of profits made by the fiduciary, then the fiduciary has the burden of proving to what extent the profits were less than this maximum— especially where the fiduciary’s breach is responsible for the difficulty or impossibility of proving the amount with certainty— and that consequently, if the fiduciary’s proof leaves the amount uncertain, judgment goes against him for the maximum figure.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalheim v. KDFW-TV
See Reed v. Murphy, 232 F.2d 668, 678 (5th Cir.) (although § 260 gives trial judge widest latitude, it imposes duty on judge to make reasoned, articulate judgment), ce rt. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 45 , 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
T-Bar Inc. v. Chatterjee
See Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299, 301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seinfeld v. Hospital Corp. of America
For it is at this precise moment that the insider acquires "the ability to profit from the stock.” Tomlin-son, "Section 16(b): A Single Analysis of Purchases and Sales — Merging the Objective and Pragmatic Analyses," 1981 Dulce L.J. 941, 953 (1981); see Stella v. Graham Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.) (no purchase occurred upon execution of purchase agreement because the purchase remained contingent until actual closing), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); Champion Home Builders v. Jeffress, 490 F.2d 611, 617 (6th Cir.) (no purchase occurred where se…
cited
Cited "see"
Raul Lara Martinez v. Food City, Inc., D/B/A Foodland
See Reed v. Murphy, 232 F.2d 668, 678 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 45 , 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,811 Provident Securities Company, a California Corporation v. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
See Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 132 F.Supp. 100, 102-103 (S.D.N.Y.1955), modified, 232 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Atlantic Seaboard Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
See Home Gas Co. v. FPC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 231 F.2d 253 , 256, cert, denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 45 , 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Seaboard Corporation v. Federal Power Commission
See Home Gas Co. v. FPC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 231 F.2d 253 , 256, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 45 , 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956). 13 A third element is the benefit of Transco's competition upon the market.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blau v. Oppenheim
See Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299, 302 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 52 (1956) (dictum); Gratz v. Claughton, 187 F.2d 46, 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 920 , 71 S.Ct. 741 , 95 L.Ed. 1353 (1951) (dictum); Smolowe v. Delendo Corp., 136 F.2d 231, 238-39 , 148 A.L.R. 300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 751 , 64 S.Ct. 56 , 88 L.Ed. 446 (1943) (dictum). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rheem Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. R. S. Rheem, Ann J. Mathes, Intervenor
See Stella v. Graham-Paige Motor Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1955, 132 F.Supp. 100, 104-105 , cause remanded 2 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 299 , certiorari denied 1956, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 . 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Piano Remittance Corp. v. Reliance Financial Services Corp.
See, e.g., Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299, 301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); Blau v. Ogsbury, 210 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir.1954) (purchase occurred at time when the insider’s “rights and obligations became fixed”); Prager, 449 F.Supp. at 432-33 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Volk v. Zlotoff
See also Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 299, 302 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956) (dictum); Gratz v. Claughton, 187 F.2d 46, 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 920 , 71 S.Ct. 741 , 95 L.Ed. 1353 (1951) (dictum); Smolowe v. Delendo Corp., supra, 136 F.2d at 238-239 (dictum).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murphey
v.
Reed, doing business as M. T. Reed Construction Co.
v.
Reed, doing business as M. T. Reed Construction Co.
No. 159.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
R. W. Thompson, Jr. for petitioners. Charles S. Corben for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.