green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
(2×)
In addition, the employee is barred from compensation if he refuses to accept any medical, hospital, surgical or other treatment provided by the employer. [5] Presumably, the employer would have a lien on any proceeds attributable to the negligence of the third-party physician. § 42-1-560(b) (1985); see Hardee v. Bruce Johnson Trucking Co., 293 S.C. 349 , 360 S.E.2d 522 (Ct.App.1987) (where workers' compensation claimant instituted third-party action against physician who allegedly exacerbated work-related injury by negligent surgery). [6] See Balancio v. United States, 267 F.2d 135, 137-138 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Scalia v. United States
See Balando v. United States, 267 F.2d 135 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 361 U.S. 875 , 80 S.Ct. 139 , 4 L.Ed.2d 114 (1959); Mohr v. United States, 184 F.Supp. 80 (N.D.Cal. 1960); Frieouf v. United States, 183 F.Supp. 439 (N.D.Cal.1960); Leahy v. United States, 160 F.Supp. 519 (E.D.N.Y.1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Ross v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 661 , 173 F. Supp. 793 , certiorari denied 361 U.S. 875 (1959); (secs. 302(b),(1) and 356(a)(2) are in pari materia).
cited
Cited "see"
Manuel Ray Rua, Jr., A/K/A John T. Welk v. United States
See United States v. Meyer, 266 F.2d 747, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied Kennedy v. United States, 361 U.S. 875 , 80 S.Ct. 138, 139 , 4 L.Ed.2d 113 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schmid v. United States
See also, Balando v. United States, 267 F.2d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 875 , 80 S.Ct. 139 , 4 L.Ed.2d 114 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
See also United States v. Meyer, 266 F. 2d 747 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U. S. 875 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
First Nat'l Bk. v. USF & G. CO.
See also United States v. Meyer, 266 F.2d 747 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 875 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Moraites Appeal of John Pensec
See also United States v. Meyer, 266 F.2d 747, 754 (C.A. 5), cert. denied, Kennedy v. United States, 361 U.S. 875 , 80 S.Ct. 138 , 4 L.Ed.2d 113 (1959), where the court stated: “[A]t this late date no substantial question can be raised but that the words ‘wilfully misapplies’ as used in Sections 656 and 657 of Title 18 United States Code, mean a criminal misapplication rather than a mere act of maladministration.”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ross
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 315.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1959.
Robert H. Myers for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Heffron, Lee A. Jackson and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
Published
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.