Milk Transp., Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 5 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Milk Transp., Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 5 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Descoteaux v. United States (wawd, 2019-11-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Descoteaux v. United States
W.D. Wash. · 2019 · confidence medium
Therefore, the Court is unable to evaluate prejudice or lack thereof on this basis. 1 Hester’s allegedly ineffective advice regarding the viability of suppression, Dkt. 14 at 2, 2 and challenges the Government’s assertion that statements he made at the plea hearing 3 and/or sentencing conclusively resolve his claims in light of the alleged extra-record 4 circumstances of the confession, id. at 3 (citing Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 5 487, 494–96 (1962) (an evidentiary hearing is required “where the issues raised . . . . 6 relate[] primarily to purported occurrences outside the…
discussed Cited "see" Greg Malone Gene Malone v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milk Transp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 190 F.Supp. 350, 355 (D.Minn.1960), aff'd per curiam, 368 U.S. 5 , 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961); cf. Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Auth., 494 U.S. 922, 933 , 110 S.Ct. 1623, 1629-30 , 108 L.Ed.2d 914 (1990) (refusing to consider a proposed interpretation when the agency did not consider the issue because doing so would usurp the agency’s authority to “give reasonable content to the statute’s textual ambiguities”).
discussed Cited "see" Puerto Rico Higher Education Assistance Corporation v. Richard W. Riley, Secretary of the Department of Education (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milk Transport, Inc. v. ICC, 190 F.Supp. 350 (D.Minn.1960), aff'd per curiam 368 U.S. 5 , 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MILK TRANSPORT, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 95.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 5
Perry R. Moore for appellant., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors, on motions to affirm the judgment.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion of W. W. Hughes for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.