green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: protection afforded doctrineCT ↗
Issue: person invoking privilegeCA ↗
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- State v. Heemstra, 721 N.W.2d 549 (Iowa 2006).published
- State Of Iowa Vs. Rodney Neil Heemstra, No. 18 / 04-0058 (Iowa Aug. 25, 2006).published
- Dickson v. State, 982 A.2d 850 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009).published
- In re Master Key Litig.. States of Illinois, & v. Edward H. McCulloch Witness-Appellee &, 507 F.2d 292 (9th Cir. 1974).published
- James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of Am., Alfred M. Watkins v. United States, 416 F.2d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1969).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GOODMAN
v.
UNITED STATES Et Al.
v.
UNITED STATES Et Al.
281, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1961.
Published opinion
Kenneth Carroad, Theodore Propp and Edwin L. Wolf for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 35 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court to permit the United States to file an appropriate motion in that court to withdraw its prior application for an order directing petitioner to testify.