Hooper v. Florida, 374 U.S. 847 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Hooper v. Florida, 374 U.S. 847 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[y]ou should consider that this case must at some time be decided”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · 'you should consider that this case must at some time be decided'
22 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Harry Robert White (ca7, 1967-07-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Harry Robert White (2×)
7th Cir. · 1967 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
you should consider that this case must at some time be decided
cited Cited "see" United States v. Almetra Renee Edwards, and Anita Louise Maxey
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barker v. Crouse, 426 F.2d 531 (10th Cir.1970) and Mills v. Tinsley, 314 F.2d 311 (10th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 847 (1963).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Andrews
Mass. App. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Milk v. Tinsley, 314 F.2d 311, 313-314 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 847 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hooper
v.
Florida
No. 1338, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
374 U.S. 847
Petitioner pro se. Richard W.- Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, for respondent.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)

Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.