green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Nunez v. Goord
See Leonhard, v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 5 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Center for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1964) (holding that the plaintiff "was entitled to conclude that the district court regarded the motion as timely....
cited
Cited "see"
Winnie Ruth Motteler v. J. A. Jones Construction Company
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan Servicing
See also Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (“[t]he district court has the power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim”) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 [, 930] (2d Cir.1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965)); Mallard v. U.S. District Court for Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 307-08 , 109 S.Ct. 1814 , 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989) (although in the context of in fonna pauperis proceedings, a particular statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d), “authorizes courts to dismiss a ‘frivolous or malicious…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
A. Jones Construction Company, 447 F.2d 954 (7th Cir. 1971); See also Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1964) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 9 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reed Enterprises v. Corcoran
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reed Enterprises v. The Honorable Howard F. Corcoran, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Milton Luros v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 13 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 568.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Kenneth K. Simon for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
Motion to dispense with printing petition for writ of certiorari granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.