green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Iraq v. First National City Bank, 241 F.Supp. 567 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (states do not enforce foreign penal laws as a matter of public policy).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Company, United States of America v. Narragansett Improvement Company, United States of America v. Eugene K. D'allesandro, United States of America v. Faust Ritarossi, United States of America v. Frances Slade
See United States v. Lichota, 351 F.2d 81, 90 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 647 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Co.
See United States v. Lichota, 351 F.2d 81, 90 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 647 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerassimos Vinieris v. Byzantine Maritime Corporation
(2×)
See United States v. Lichota, 351 F.2d 81, 89-90 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 647 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethiopian Spice Extraction Share Co. v. Kalamazoo Spice Extraction Co.
See Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (doctrine not applied to King Faisal’s New York bank accounts because only a United States court could compel bank to pay). *1233 In the matter before the Court, the taking of ESESCO shares is a fait accompli and there is nothing a United States court can do about it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Bank Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Cosmic International, Inc., Janata Bank and Amin Jute Mills, Ltd. v. Cosmic International, Inc. And Irving Trust Company, Sonali Bank and Nishat Jute Mills, Ltd. v. Irving Trust Company and Cosmic International, Inc., Nishat Jute Mills, Ltd. And National Bank of Pakistan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Cosmic International, Inc.
Although the Bangladesh plaintiffs acknowledge that no compensation was paid for any of the Pakistani property purportedly seized, they maintain that the act of state doctrine precludes American courts from examining the propriety of any taking effected by Bangladesh law. 7 The act of state doctrine, of course, is derived from the principle that "(e) very sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State," and on this basis the Supreme Court has declared that " the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done wit…
discussed
Cited "see"
United Bank Ltd. v. Cosmic International Inc.
The act of state doctrine, of course, is derived from the principle that “[ejvery sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State,” and on this basis the Supreme Court has declared that “the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory.” Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897) (emphasis added); see Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 416, 428 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964). 3 The district court below, however, rely…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bond
See United States v. Lichota, C.A. 6th (1965), 351 F.2d 81, 91 [6], certiorari denied (1966), 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 647 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 , rehearing denied (1966), 383 U.S. 954 , 86 S.Ct. 1195 , 16 L.Ed.2d 216 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
(2×)
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423-427 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964); see Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47, 50-51 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) See generally Hill, The- Law-Making Power of the Federal Courts: Constitutional Preemption, 67 Colum.L.Rev. 1024 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudie v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Commissioner v. Indiana Broadcasting Corporation, 350 F. 2d 580 (C.A. 7, 1965), reversing 41 T.C. 793 (1964), certiorari denied 382 U.S. 1027 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Nastri & Carta Carbone v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co.
See Republic of Iraq v. First Nat’l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 n. 3 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 648 (1966); Currie, On the Displacement of the Law of the Forum, in Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws 3, 36-39 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Nastri & Carta Carbone v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co., Inc.
See Republic of Iraq v. First Nat'l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 n. 3 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 648 (1966); Currie, On the Displacement of the Law of the Forum, in Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws 3, 36-39 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Andreadis A/K/A John Andre and Drug Research Corporation
Andre’s agent, the Kastor-Hilton agency, certainly knew that the endorsers’ statements were factually false and it was permissible for the jury to infer that Kastor-Hilton, through Levine, conveyed this fact to Andre. 10 United States v. Press, supra, 336 F.2d at 1009 ; see United States v. Lichota, 351 F.2d 81 (6 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 647 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liu v. Republic of China
See Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 400-01 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 926-27 (act of state involved the Cuban government’s act of expropriating the property of aliens located within Cuba); see also Republic of Iraq v. First Nat’l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (“when property confiscated is within the United States at the time of the attempted confiscation, our courts will give effect to acts of state ‘only if they are consistent with the policy and law of the United States.’ ” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Foreign Rel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liu v. Republic of China
See Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 400-01 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 926-27 (act of state involved the Cuban government's act of expropriating the property of aliens located within Cuba); see also Republic of Iraq v. First Nat'l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) ("when property confiscated is within the United States at the time of the attempted confiscation, our courts will give effect to acts of state 'only if they are consistent with the policy and law of the United States.' " (quoting Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law o…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Indiana Broadcasting Corp.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
No. 743.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1966.
382 U.S. 1027
Whitman Knapp and Martin F. Richman for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Robert A. Bernstein for respondent., Douglas A. Anello for National Association of Broadcasters, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denie.d.