green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“the government is the sole proper party to seek enforcement of government antitrust decrees.”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Roofing Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
the government is the sole proper party to seek enforcement of government antitrust decrees.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportattion Authority
See DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 233 F.Supp. 7 (D.Or.1964), aff'd, 343 F.2d 911 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 415 F.2d 247 (3d Cir.1969); Blake v. Kline, 612 F.2d 718 (3d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Adden v. Middlebrooks
See generally DeLong Corp. v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 233 F.Supp. 7 (D.Or.1964), aff'd, 343 F.2d 911 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 ; 6 A.L.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Adden v. Middlebrooks
See generally DeLong Corp. v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 233 F.Supp. 7 (D.Or.1964), aff’d, 343 F.2d 911 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 ; 6 A.L.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cinema Service Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Control Data Corp. v. IBM Corp., 306 F.Supp. 839, 845 (D.Minn.1969), aff’d, 430 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir. 1970); Independent Theatres, Inc. v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., 179 F.Supp. 489, 490 (S.D.N.Y. 1959); Brownlee v. Malco Theatres, Inc., 99 F.Supp. 312, 317 (W.D.Ark.1951).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Spring Road Corp.
Accord, DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 233 F.Supp. 7, 19 (D.Ore. 1964), aff’d 343 F.2d 911 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merrill Eugene Riggle v. State of California
Accord, DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 233 F.Supp. 7, 19 (D.Ore.1964), aff'd 343 F.2d 911 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). 17 Appellant has not cited, nor do we find, any provision in the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act or the Bridge Act of 1906 which would amount to congressional authorization of suits against the states, or meet the explicit waiver requirements announced in Employees and Edelman.
cited
Cited "see"
Plante v. Watson
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Auth. & Pub., 341 F.2d 1003 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965) (discussing a similar federal rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spangler ex rel. Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 38 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 32 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965) (indirect benefit insufficient).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 38 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 32 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965) (indirect benefit insufficient).
cited
Cited "see"
State of West Virginia v. Haynes
See DeLong Corp. v. Oregon State Highway Commission, 343 F.2d 911 (9 Cir., 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 161 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biovail Corp. International v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
“Cases involving antitrust consent decrees have hewed closely to the Blue Chip rule barring any person not directly participating in the consent decree from suing to enforce its terms.” Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co., 654 F.Supp. 1419, 1437 (D.Del.1987), aff'd, 988 F.2d 386 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 908 , 114 S.Ct. 289 , 126 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993); see also United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.) (“the government is the sole proper party to seek enforcement of government antitrust decrees”…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ellhamer
v.
California
v.
California
No. 256.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1965.
382 U.S. 877
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.