Pena v. California, 385 U.S. 883 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Pena v. California, 385 U.S. 883 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases · "the pronouncement of sentence represents the judgment of the court and that the order of judgment is merely evidence of the sentence...."
32 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Paul C. \Paulie\" Villano" (ca10, 1987-04-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Paul C. \Paulie\" Villano"
10th Cir. · 1987 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the pronouncement of sentence represents the judgment of the court and that the order of judgment is merely evidence of the sentence....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Paul C. Villano
10th Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the pronouncement of sentence represents the judgment of the court and that the order of judgment is merely evidence of the sentence....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Penson
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
“When an orally pronounced sentence is ambiguous, however, the judgment and commitment order is evidence which may be used to determine the intended sentence.” United States v. Villano, 816 F.2d 1448, 1451 (10th Cir. 1987) (en banc), quoted in United States v. Brown, 47 F. App’x 305, 315 (6th Cir. 2002) (unpublished), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 (2003) and United States v. Shure, No. 88-1899, 1989 WL 49837, at *2 (6th Cir. May 12, 1989) (unpublished); see also Sasser v. United States, 352 F.2d 796, 797 (6th Cir. 1965) (noting that “it is true that the pronouncement of sentence represen…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Penson
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
“When an orally pronounced sentence is ambiguous, however, the judgment and commitment order is evidence which may be used to determine the intended sentence.” United States v. Villano, 816 F.2d 1448, 1451 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc), quoted in United States v. Brown, 47 Fed.Appx. 305, 315 (6th Cir.2002) (unpublished), cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 , 123 S.Ct. 930 , 154 L.Ed.2d 833 (2003) and United States v. Shure, No. 88-1899, 1989 WL 49837, at *2 (6th Cir. May 12, 1989) (unpublished); see also Sasser v. United States, 352 F.2d 796, 797 (6th Cir.1965) (noting that “it is true that the pro…
Pena
v.
California
No. 444.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
385 U.S. 883
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2)

C. A. 9th Cir.

Certiorari denied.