green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins
he trier is entitled, in fact bound, to consider the evidence as a whole; and, in law as in life, the effect of this generally is much greater than of the sum of the parts
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James L. Love
See United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966); Slocum v. United States, 325 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1963); Helms v. United States, 310 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1962); Shiflett v. Welch, 161 F.2d 933 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 777 , 68 S.Ct. 41 , 92 L.Ed. 362 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Zanganeh
See Federal Maritime Commission v. De Smedt, 366 F.2d 464 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966); SEC v. Minas de Artemisa, 150 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1945).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. John D. MacArthur and Bankers Life and Casualty Co.
See Federal Maritime Commission v. DeSmedt, 366 F.2d 464, 469-471 (2d Cir. 1966), certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ismael Rivera, A/K/A \Pequilino\""
See United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389, 392-93 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 514 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael J. Scandifia
See United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389, 394 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 514 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mackiewicz
See United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389, 395 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 (1966); see also United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kronberg v. Administrator
See, e.g., United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patty McClain Joseph M. Rodriguez, Ada Eveleigh Simpson, William Clark Simpson and Mike Bradshaw
See, e. g., United States v. Bottone, 2 Cir. 1966, 365 F.2d 389 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 514 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 ; 7 United States v. Vicars, 6 Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 720 ; 8 Lake v. United States, 10 Cir. 1964, 338 F.2d 787 . 9 Thus, on one side of the argument we have a federal criminal statute that has been given an expansive scope.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herbert R. Jacobs
Compare United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389, 394-395 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 514 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966). 28 V.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Dzvonick
(2×)
Commonwealth v. Komatowski, 347 Pa. 445 , 32 A. 2d 905 (1943), citing Commonwealth v. Huston, 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 172 (1911); Commonwealth v. Micuso, 273 Pa. 474 , 117 Atl. 211 (1922); see also United States v. Henson, 365 F. 2d 282 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S. Ct. 513 (1966); Helms v. United States, 310 F. 2d 236 (5th Cir. 1962); cf. Glenn v. United States, 420 F. 2d 1323 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Satiris G. Fassoulis
See also United States v. Bottone, 365 F.2d 389, 394-395 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 514 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mason's Island Yacht Club, Inc. v. United States
The net of the language is cast over a multiplicity of conditions precedent to membership, but Courts have repeatedly been warned: “There is no surer way to misread any document than to read it literally,” Gemsco, Inc. v. Walling, 324 U.S. 244 , 65 S.Ct. 605 , 89 L.Ed. 921 (1945); see also Federal Maritime Comm. v. DeSmedt, 366 F.2d 464 , 469, 470 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966). ‘That admonition fits here.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeSmedt, President, American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
No. 694.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1966.
Elmer C. Maddy and Ronald A. Capone for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, David L. Rose, Jack H. Weiner and Robert N. Katz for the Federal Maritime Commission, and H. Thomas Austem and William H. Allen for Ludlow Corp., respondents.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.