green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Daryl Edward Decroix v. Commonwealth of Virginia
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 444 (1968) (in prosecution for sodomy, testimony that boy’s mouth was merely placed “on” defendant’s “privates” held insufficient to prove penetration), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santillo v. Commonwealth
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 444 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 658 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 884 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969); see also Lankford v. Foster, 546 F.Supp. 241 , 249 n. 11 (W.D.Va.1982) (defining “sodomy with the mouth” as cunnilingus and “sodomy by the mouth” as fellatio). 7 In the instant case, we hold that Code § 18.2-361 is sufficiently clear to inform both citizens and law enforcement *484 officers of what acts constitute carnal knowledge “by or with the mouth.” The statute clearly provides that the acts prohibited involve contact between the mouth …
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Commonwealth
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 444 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 658 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 (1969) (in prosecution for sodomy, testimony that boy’s mouth was merely placed “on” defendant’s “privates” held insufficient to prove penetration).
cited
Cited "see"
John A. Hendrix v. Commonwealth
See Walker v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 438, 443-44 , 404 S.E.2d 394, 396 (1991) (citing Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 444-45 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 658 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 (1969)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lankford v. Foster
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 158 S.E.2d 657 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 884 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969) (carnal knowledge as fellatio); Ryan v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 439 , 247 S.E.2d 698 (1978) (carnal knowledge as cunnilingus).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 445-46 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 659-60 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 884 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph C. Frady
(2×)
See Bearden v. United States, 403 F.2d 782, 787 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 920 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969) (holding that Rule 30 does "not bar invocation of Rule 52(b) where instructions have resulted in a miscarriage of justice"). 28 While the purpose of Rule 30 is to allow the trial judge to correct trial errors before the jury retires, United States v. Williams, 521 F.2d 950, 956 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Commonwealth
See Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 446 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 659 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruno Anthony Piet and Delmar L. Markham
Accord, Dunson v. United States, 404 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 925 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Horton v. Commonwealth
See also Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443, 444 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 658 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 (1969) (finding evidence that boy’s mouth was merely placed on man’s genitals insufficient to prove penetration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Proctor v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443 , 158 S.E.2d 657, 658 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 884 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969) (where evidence showed only that victim was “told to ‘put my mouth on his [penis],’ ” proof of sodomy was insufficient); People v. Angier, 44 Cal.App.2d 417 , 112 P.2d 659, 660 (1941) (kissing not sufficient evidence of penetration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barrett v. United States
See also, Bearden v. United States, 403 F.2d 782 (5th Cir.1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 920 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 ; United States v. Granello, 403 F.2d 337 (2d Cir.1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S.Ct. 878 , 21 L.Ed.2d 785 ; DeMaro v. Willingham, 401 F.2d 105 (7th Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dunson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
393 U.S. 1111
James F. Hewitt for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.