green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“like our sister circuits, we have recognized an 'implied requirement of ascertainability' in rule 23 of the 14 federal rules of civil procedure.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
mentioned
Vacated
State v. Fulminante
State v. Gause, 107 Ariz. 491, 493-95 , 489 P.2d 830, 832-34 (1971), judgment vacated by Gause v. Ari zona, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 192 , 34 L.Ed.2d 71 (1972).
cited
Cited "but see"
Cullen v. NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERV. COMN.
But see Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).
cited
Cited "but see"
Cullen v. New York State Civil Service Commission
But see Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP Mari Newman and Towards Justice v. BKP, Inc. Ella Bliss Beauty Bar LLC Ella
like our sister circuits, we have recognized an 'implied requirement of ascertainability' in rule 23 of the 14 federal rules of civil procedure.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Canales
See State v. Gause, 107 Ariz. 491, 493 , 489 P.2d 830 (1971) (“[tjhere is no presumption that by making a prior determination of probable cause to issue an arrest warrant, amagistrate cannot thereafter make an independent and unbiased determination of whether probable cause exists to bind a defendant over for trial”), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S. Ct. 192 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR. OF WEST CTY. v. Webster
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566, 572 (8th Cir.1972), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972); David v. Smith, 607 F.2d 535 , 540 (2nd Cir.1978); Local 1928, American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 630 F.Supp. 947 , 948 n. 2 (D.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sargent v. Block
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Company, 459 F.2d 566, 572 (8th Cir.1972), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972); Berlin Democratic Club v. Rumsfeld, 410 F.Supp. 144, 163-64 (D.D.C.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 8 Cir. 1972, 459 F.2d 566, 572 , vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 ; Snyder v. Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of Illinois, N.D.Ill.1968, 286 F.Supp. 927, 931 ; Rosado v. Wyman, E.D.N.Y.1970, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1194 , aff'd, 2 Cir., 437 F.2d 619 , aff’d mem., 1971, 402 U.S. 991 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 ; 7 C.
cited
Cited "see"
East Tennessee Tenants' Ass'n Fairview Chapter v. Harris
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566, 572 (8th Cir. 1972), vacated and remanded to dismiss as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.
See United States v. Ketola, 455 F.2d 83, 85 (9th Cir.), vacated and remanded on another ground, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 139 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972), aff’d on remand, 478 F.2d 64 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 847 , 94 S.Ct. 133 , 38 L.Ed.2d 95 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Errett v. Rasmussen
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566, 573 (8th Cir.) (Matthes, J., dissenting), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972). 1 *406 This Court, in its prior ruling on mootness filed on September 8, 1975, stated as follows: A “substantial controversy” exists between the parties to this litigation, for although a bond complying with procedural Rule 337 has been procured for Mr. Errett by Firestone, the plaintiffs strenuously contest the legality of that bond.
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Weir
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.), vacated and dismissed as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 Ed.2d 72 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Weir
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.), vacated and dismissed as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Lamb v. Hamblin
See Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.), jud’m vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972); Thomas v. Clarke, 54 F.R.D. 245, 252 (D.Minn. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonser v. State of New Jersey
See Aiello v. City of Wilmington, Del., 426 F.Supp. 1272 (D.Del.1976); see also Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.1972), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Denver Welfare Rights Organization v. Public Utilities Commission
See also Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1972), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct. 66 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972); Bronson v. Consolidated Edison Co., 350 F.Supp. 443 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); Hattell v. Public Service Co., 350 F.Supp. 240 (D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gause
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 71-6460.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Colorado (1)
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certi-orari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U. S. 845.