Emporium Capwell Co. v. W. Addition Cmty. Org., 415 U.S. 913 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Emporium Capwell Co. v. W. Addition Cmty. Org., 415 U.S. 913 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Rajczak (nyappdiv, 2015-10-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Rajczak
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
However, once the defendant has introduced character evidence, the People may question the defense witness about whether he or she has heard of the defendant’s previous criminal acts, since such questions are relevant to the ability of the character witness to accurately reflect the defendant’s reputation in the community’ ” (People v Marzug, 280 AD2d 974, 975 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 904 [2001]; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 [1973], rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 [1973], cert denied 415 US 913 [1974]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Rajczak
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
However, once the defendant has introduced character evidence, the People may question the defense witness about whether he or she has heard of the defendant’s previous criminal acts, since such questions are relevant to the ability of the character witness to accurately reflect the defendant’s reputation in the community’ ” (People v Marzug, 280 AD2d 974, 975 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 904 [2001]; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 [1973], rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 [1973], cert denied 415 US 913 [1974]).
discussed Cited "see" RAJCZAK, JR., ANDREW F., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
However, -2- 1060 KA 13-00067 once the defendant has introduced character evidence, the People may question the defense witness about whether he or she has heard of the defendant’s previous criminal acts, since such questions are relevant to the ability of the character witness to accurately reflect the defendant’s reputation in the community’ ” (People v Marzug, 280 AD2d 974, 975 , lv denied 96 NY2d 904 ; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 , rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 , cert denied 415 US 913 ).
discussed Cited "see" JIMMESON, MAKESHA, PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Character evidence “ ‘is strictly limited to testimony concerning the [party’s] reputation’ ” in the community (People v Mancini, 213 AD2d 1038, 1039 , lv denied 85 NY2d 976 ; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 , rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 , cert denied 415 US 913 ), and thus “a character witness may not testify to specific acts” in order to establish character (Mancini, 213 AD2d at 1039 ; see People v Ciccone, 90 AD3d 1141, 1144 , lv denied 19 NY3d 863 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Jimmeson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Character evidence “ ‘is strictly limited to testimony concerning the [party’s] reputation’ ” in the community (People v Mancini, 213 AD2d 1038, 1039 [1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 976 [1995]; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 [1973], rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 [1973], cert denied 415 US 913 [1974]), and thus “a character witness may not testify to specific acts” in order to establish character (Mancini, 213 AD2d at 1039 ; see People v Ciccone, 90 AD3d 1141, 1144 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 863 [2012]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Jimmeson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Character evidence “ ‘is strictly limited to testimony concerning the [party’s] reputation’ ” in the community (People v Mancini, 213 AD2d 1038, 1039 [1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 976 [1995]; see People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 [1973], rearg denied 33 NY2d 644 [1973], cert denied 415 US 913 [1974]), and thus “a character witness may not testify to specific acts” in order to establish character (Mancini, 213 AD2d at 1039 ; see People v Ciccone, 90 AD3d 1141, 1144 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 863 [2012]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Lapage
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant’s witness testified that she never had a concern when defendant was with her children, which opened the door for cross-examination regarding her knowledge of reports of child abuse concerning defendant (see People v Tuckerman, 134 AD2d 732, 733 [1987]; see generally People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436, 443 [1973], cert denied 415 US 913 [1974]; People v Nicosia, 18 AD3d 673, 673 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 117, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9923 (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See n.4, supra. Compare Western Additions Community Organ. v. N.L.R.B., 158 U.S.App.D.C. 138 , 485 F.2d 917 (1973), cert. granted, 415 U.S. 913 , 94 S.Ct. 1407 , 39 L.Ed.2d 446 (1974) 10 We note that the conciliation agreement does not define the term 'relevant labor market.' The EEOC used New Jersey statewide percentages of females and minority group members in finding reasonabel cause to believe the Company discriminated against these groups.
cited Cited "see" Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Local Unions 327, 749, 1289, 1298, 1303, 1309 & 1314 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
3rd Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See n.4, supra. Compare Western Additions Community Organ, v. N.L.R.B., 158 U.S.App.D.C. 138 , 485 F.2d 917 (1973), cert. granted, 415 U.S. 913 , 94 S.Ct. 1407 , 39 L.Ed.2d 446 (1974). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quartararo v. Fogg
E.D.N.Y · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People v. Kuss, 32 N.Y.2d 436, 443 , 345 N.Y.S.2d 1002 , 299 N.E.2d 249 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 913 , 94 S.Ct. 1408 , 39 L.Ed.2d 467 (1974); Prince, Richardson on Evidence, § 150 (10th ed. 1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Baresh
S.D. Tex. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
McClure, supra; see also, United States v. Jenkins, 480 F.2d 1198 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 913 , 94 S.Ct. 256 , 38 L.Ed.2d 151 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Greenwade v. Citizens Bank of Oregon
Or. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, DeVore v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 265 Or 388, 403-04 , 508 P2d 220 (1973), cert den 415 US 913 (1974). *401 Assuming arguendo that there was no separate consideration for the oral agreement, 4 we turn to the second part of the Restatement test: the intent of the parties as indicated by all the circumstances.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hatley v. Stafford (2×)
Or. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Stevens v. Good Samaritan Hosp., supra, and Land Reclamation v. Riverside Corp., 261 Or 180 , 492 P2d 263 (1972) (both supporting plaintiff’s position) with Caldwell et ux v. Wells, supra, and DeVore v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 265 Or 388 , 508 P2d 220 (1973), cert. denied 415 US 913 , 94 S Ct 1408 , 39 LEd 2d 467 (1974) (both supporting defendants’ position).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emporium Capwell Co.
v.
Western Addition Community Organization and National Labor Relations Board v. Western Addition Community Organization
No. 73-696; No. 73-830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1974.
415 U.S. 913
Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.

Reported below: 158 U. S. App. D. C. 138, 485 F. 2d 917.