green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.8 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1981 ·
…the federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of John Conboy, Deponent
(2×)
the federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of John Conboy, Deponent
(2×)
the federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.
cited
Cited "see"
Cowden v. Ramsay (In Re Cowden)
See Laundry Workers Union v. Mahoney, 491 F.2d 1029 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 49 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harloff
To sustain this burden, we have held that the government must prove that it “relied solely on evidence from legitimate independent sources.” In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 644 F.2d 70, 76 (2d Cir.1981) (citing Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. at 460, 92 S.Ct. at 1664 ); see United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominic Mariani
To sustain this burden, we have held that the government must prove that it “relied solely on evidence from legitimate independent sources.” In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 644 F.2d 70, 76 (2d Cir.1981) (citing Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. at 460 , 92 S.Ct. at 1664 ); see United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph G. Fagan
See United States v. Johnson, 487 F.2d 1318, 1321 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Santa
See United States v. Johnson, 487 F.2d 1318, 1321 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); Rowlette v. United States, 392 F.2d 437, 439 (10th Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Marriage of Vinson
See In Re Fithian, 10 Cal 3d 592, 517 P2d 449 , cert den 419 US 825, 95 S Ct 41 , 42 L Ed 2d 48 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert C. Pantone, United States of America v. John Kumer
See United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Marriage of Schissel
See In re Marriage of Fithian, 10 Cal.3d 592, 596 , 111 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 517 P.2d 449, 451 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974) (taking military retired pay into consideration).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 344 Leather Goods, Plastics & Novelty Workers' Union v. Singer Co.
See Laundry, Dry Cleaning and Dye House Workers International Union, Local 93 v. Mahoney, 491 F.2d 1029 (8th Cir. 1973) (equally divided court), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 49 (1974); Pressman’s Local 318 v. Piedmont Publishing Co., 393 F.2d 221 (4th Cir. 1968); A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston, 361 F.2d 218 (2d Cir. 1966), affirming 253 F.Supp. 509 (S.D.N.Y.). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pearlstein
See United States v. Bruce, 488 F.2d 1224, 1229 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); United States v. Uhrig, 443 F.2d 239, 242 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 832 , 92 S.Ct. 81 , 30 L.Ed.2d 62 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pearlstein
See United States v. Bruce, 488 F.2d 1224, 1229 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); United States v. Uhrig, 443 F.2d 239, 242 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 832 , 92 S.Ct. 81 , 30 L.Ed.2d 62 (1971). 57 As summarized above, the primary misrepresentations incorporated into the GMF/Elgin Pen promotional material were the creation of a fictitious corporate officer, Russell E.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diecidue
See United States v. Johnson, 487 F.2d 1318 , 1325 f. n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974), noting the distinction between motions asserting newly discovered evidence in general and motions suggesting prosecutorial misconduct in particular. 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Panebianco
See generally United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 273-74 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Solomon Block and Rosalind Block, Bankrupts. Solomon Block, Bankrupt-Appellant v. Sylvia Consino, Creditors-Appellees
See United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974). 5 In addition, nothing said herein is designed to preclude the district judge from resorting to expedients, such as requiring the presence of prosecutors at the time of Block’s testimony or immediately bringing such testimony to the attention of such prosecutors, as he may determine proper to protect Block from use of his testimony.
examined
Cited "see"
Ramsey v. Ramsey
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard E. Welsh v. Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff, Roanoke County, Commonwealth of Virginia
See Harris, 973 F.2d at 338 (noting that " '[t]he focus of the inquiry under Kastigar ... is not whether the prosecutor was aware of the contents of the immunized testimony, but whether he used the testimony in any way to build a case against the defendant' " (quoting United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487, 1518 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 917 (1987))); see also United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.) (finding no taint where the prosecutor "established that he had prior knowledge of substantially all the information covered in the [defendant's immunized] testimony,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welsh v. Holt
See Harris, 973 F.2d at 338 (noting that "`[t]he focus of the inquiry under Kastigar . . . is not whether the prosecutor was aware of the contents of the immunized testimony, but whether he used the testi- mony in any way to build a case against the defendant'" (quoting United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487, 1518 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 917 (1987))); see also United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.) (finding no taint where the prosecutor "established that he had prior knowledge of substantially all the infor- mation covered in the [defendant's immunized] testi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl Nanni
See, e.g., United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 272 (2d Cir.) (rejecting the suggestion “that access to grand jury testimony ipso facto prevents the government from carrying its burden under Kastigar ”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuhn v. State Dept. of Revenue of State of Colo.
Id.; see also In re Marriage of Fithian, 10 Cal.3d 592, 604 , 517 P.2d 449, 456 , 111 Cal.Rptr. 369, 376 (“military retirement pay must be realistically viewed as compensation for past, not present, services”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Marriage of Richardson
See Manners and Manners, 68 Or App 896, 899 , 683 P2d 134 (1984); see also In re Marriage of Fithian, 10 Cal 3d 592, 111 Cal Rptr 369, 517 P2d 449 , cert den 419 US 825 (1974); Kruger v. Kruger, 139 NJ Super 413, 354 A2d 340 (1976) mod 73 NJ 463, 375 A2d 659 (1977); Webster v. Webster, 442 SW2d 786 (Tex Civ App 1969); see generally Brunch, The Definition and Division of Marital Property in California: Towards Parity and Simplicity, 33 Hastings L J 771, 851 n 332 *379 (1982) (“time rule is useful with respect to defined benefit plans, in which benefits reflect some factor (such as final earni…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene Mastropieri
See, e.g., United States v. Catalano, 491 F.2d 268, 273 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); United States v. Aulet, 618 F.2d 182, 191 (2 Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.
See also Laundry, Dry Cleaning and Dye House Workers Local 98 v. Mahoney, 491 F.2d 1029 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 42 , 42 L.Ed.2d 49 (1974); Bonnot v. Congress of Independent Unions Local 14, 331 F.2d 355 (8th Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Rogers
See, e. g., In re Marriage of Fithian, 10 Cal.3d 592 , 111 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 517 P.2d 449 (1947), cert. denied 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 ; Mora v. Mora, 429 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Civ.App.1968); and In re Marriage of Musser, 70 Ill.App.3d 706 , 27 Ill.Dec. 240 , 388 N.E.2d 1289 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bruce
v.
United States and Walker v. United States
v.
United States and Walker v. United States
No. 73-1291; No. 73-1558.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (4)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 488 F. 2d 1224.