green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Matter of New York, New Haven and Hartford R. Co.
the better view is that the market does provide the best evidence of the value, notwithstanding a depressed state, or even a large-scale manipulation, of the market as a whole.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawson Mardon Wheaton, Inc. v. Smith
See Amerada Hess Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 517 F. 2d 75, 82 (3d Cir.1975) (while the computation of the actual dollar worth of the stock is a question of fact not to be disturbed unless clearly erroneous, whether the lower court applied the correct standard of valuation applicable to the factual situation is a question of law), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1037 , 96 S.Ct. 574 , 46 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Mehdi Razavi and Alexandra L. Razavi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Amerada Hess Corp. v. Commissioner, 517 F.2d 75, 82 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1037 , 96 S.Ct. 574 , 46 L.Ed.2d 412 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Gilford v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Amerada Hess Corp. v. Commissioner , 517 F.2d 75 , 91 n. 4 (3d Cir. 1975) , cert. denied 423 U.S. 1037 ↩ (1975) . 26.
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. United States
See Amerada Hess Corp. v. Commissioner, supra, 517 F.2d 75 , 84 n.33 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1037 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald E. Bemis Brenda E. Bemis v. Tim Edwards Leo Lotito Perry Aldrich City of Bend
Miller v. Keating, 754 F.2d 507, 511 (3d Cir.1985) (excluding testimony tending to fault plaintiff in car accident case because of lack of evidence of declarant’s personal knowledge); 4 Weinstein & Berger, supra, ¶ 803(2)[01], at 803-104; see also McLaughlin v. Vinzant, 522 F.2d 448, 451 (1st Cir.) (emphasizing that the proponent of hearsay evidence had to show that the declarant could have witnessed the shooting), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1037 , 96 S.Ct. 573 , 46 L.Ed.2d 412 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniels
Compare McLaughlin v. Vinzant, 522 F.2d 448 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1037 , 96 S.Ct. 573 , 46 L.Ed.2d 412 (1975) (excited utterance withstood confrontation cause challenge) with State v. Butcher, 120 Ariz. 234 , 585 P.2d 254 (Ariz.App.1978) (victim’s out-of-court statements, though properly falling within the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, had insufficient other indicia of *786 reliability to be admitted against a confrontation clause challenge). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lackey v. State
(2×)
See also, Beaupre v. State, 526 S.W.2d 811 (Tex.Cr.App.1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1037 , 96 S.Ct. 573 , 46 L.Ed.2d 412 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murphy
v.
Briscoe
v.
Briscoe
No. 75-5667.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.