green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America
Id. at 893 ; but cf, Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 722-28 (10th Cir.1975) (ien banc) (finding extraordinary circumstances where the change in law arose out of the same accident in which the plaintiffs had been involved), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America and Ngpl-Trailblazer, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd., and the Coastal Corporation, Counterclaim Midcon Ventures, Inc., Counterclaimant
Id. at 893; but cf, Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 722-23 (10th Cir.1975) (en banc ) (finding extraordinary circumstances where the change in law arose out of the same accident in which the plaintiffs had been involved), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Public Employees Retirement, System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc., A, Kansas Corporation Ronald Reimer, an Individual Kenneth H. Koger, Anindividual Clifford W. Shinski, an Individual Brent Messick, an Individual Robert Crew, an Individual Sherman Dreiseszun, an Individual I. I. Ozar, an Individual Frank Sebree, an Individual - Michael K. Russell, an Individual, Gage & Tucker, a Law Partnership Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., an Accountancy Firm Kpmg Peat Marwick, an Accountancy Firm Robert Spence, an Individual Thomas S. Morgan, Co-Executor of the Estate of Frank S. Morgan Marilyn J., Co-Executor of the Estate of Frank Morgan, - C. Patrick McLarney Substituted for Shook Hardy Law Firm, Intervenor - Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell, Sanders, Peper, Martin, L.L.P. William H. Sanders, Sr., Individually and as the Representative of a Class
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 (1976); McGeshick v. Choucair, 72 F.3d 62, 64-65 (7th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1212 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Roger Associates, Inc.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976); McGeshick v. Choucair, 72 F.3d 62, 64-65 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1212 , 116 S.Ct. 1834 , 134 L.Ed.2d 937 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Loum v. Houston's Restaurants, Inc.
See Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust, 994 F.2d 716, 729 (10th Cir. 1993) Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 722 (10th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 1079, 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crawford by and Through Crawford v. City of Kansas
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 720, 724 (10th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976) (federal court must accept most recent pronouncement of state law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wendy's International, Inc. v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976) (granting relief under 60(b)(6) when there had been a post-judgment change in the law which arose out of the same accident as that in which the plaintiffs were injured).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonnie Sargent v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976) (granting post-judgment relief in diversity case because of supervening contrary decision of Oklahoma state court, where litigants had been forced into federal court by removal and had therefore not voluntarily assumed *91 risk of federal court deciding issue of state law); cf. DeWeerth, 38 F.3d at 1273 (reversing grant of relief from judgment by district court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and holding it inappropriate to reopen judgment because plaintiff, by bringing suit …
cited
Cited "see"
Myron Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Company and Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Co.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 (1976). -7- “Numerous courts have held that the mere showing of a change in the law is not enough to demonstrate such an extraordinary situation when the judgment has become final.” Overbee v. Van Waters & Rogers, 765 F.2d 578, 580 (6th Cir. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manhattan Cable Television, Inc. v. Cable Doctor, Inc.
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720 (10th Cir.1975) (Rule 60(b)(6) relief granted following change, in a related state case, of the state doctrine relied on in the federal diversity case), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976); McGrath v. Potash, 199 F.2d 166 (D.C.Cir.1952) (Rule 60(b)(6) relief granted following passage of new act by Congress eliminating statutory requirement on which judgment was based); DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 804 F.Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (Rule 60(b)(6) relief granted following change in state law).
cited
Cited "see"
DeWeerth v. Baldinger
See Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cousins v. Maryland
See Dempsey v. United States, 423 U. S. 1079 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Susi v. Flowers, 423 U. S. 1006 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Vardas v. Texas, 423 U. S. 904 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Stewart v. Iowa, 423 U. S. 902 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Waugh v. Gray, 422 U. S. 1027 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Wells v. Missouri, 419 U. S. 1075 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Moton v. Swenson, 417 U. S. 957 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Tijerina v. New Mexico, 417 U. S. 956 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U. S. 995 (1974) (Brennan,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ragano v. United States
See Dempsey v. United States, 423 U. S. 1079 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Susi v. Flowers, 423 U. S. 1006 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Vardas v. Texas, 423 U. S. 904 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Stewart v. Iowa, 423 U. S. 902 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Waugh v. Gray, 422 U. S. 1027 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Wells v. Missouri, 419 U. S. 1075 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Moton v. Swenson, 417 U. S. 957 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Tijerina v. New Mexico, 417 U. S. 956 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U. S. 995 (1974) (Brennan,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.
See , e.g. , Pierce v. Cook & Co. , 518 F.2d 720 , 723 (10th Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied , 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976) (granting relief under Rule 60(b)(6) due to extraordinary circumstance of a post-judgment change in the law arising out of the same accident as that in which the plaintiffs were injured).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance
(2×)
See also Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 722-23 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 (1976) (cited in Schwochert, 166 Wis. 2d at 103 ). *66 ¶ 26.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. $4,299.32 U.S. Currency
See, e.g., Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720, 723 (10th Cir.1975) (“The federal courts in which plaintiffs were forced to litigate have given them substantially different treatment than that received in state.”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976); but see Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Co., 66 F.3d 743, 749 (5th Cir.1995) (“Our role as an Erie court strengthens, rather than undermines, the proposition that a change in decisional law is insufficient to constitute an extraordinary circumstance.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill, Debtors, State Bank of Southern Utah v. John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill
(2×)
See, e.g., Pierce v. Cook & Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 720, 722 (10th Cir.1975) ("Rule 60(b) gives the court a 'grand reservoir of equitable power to do justice in a particular case.' ") (en banc) (quoting Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., 318 F.2d 538, 542 (2d Cir.1963)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 , 96 S.Ct. 866 , 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cook & Co., Inc.
v.
Pierce
v.
Pierce
No. 75-449.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1976.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.