green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 · 2 courts ·
…ase law and dictionary definition agree that endanger means something less than actual harm
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
City of New York v. ANGLEBROOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
because of their contemporaneous enactment, interpretations of provisions of one act have frequently been applied to the comparable provision of the other
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gloria Price v. United States Navy Harry Moses Marguerite Moses (Deceased) Michael Moses Shirley Moses
ase law and dictionary definition agree that endanger means something less than actual harm
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ernest Dague, Sr., Ernest Dague, Jr., Betty Dague, and Rose A. Bessette v. City of Burlington
ase law and dictionary definition agree that endanger means something less than actual harm
cited
Cited "see"
Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans
See Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 34 (D.C.Cir.), cert. den., 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 25 & n. 52 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 25 & n. 52 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 92 Although we find Dr. Brown's affidavit highly probative, it is not dispositive of the issues at bar.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Mining Ass'n v. U.S. Department of the Interior
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 48 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 89 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (notice need not contain “every precise proposal which [the agency] may ultimately adopt as a rule”); Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 673 F.2d 525, 533 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 103 S.Ct. 79 , 74 L.Ed.2d 76 (1982) (agency need not republish for notice and comment rules that follow logically from, or that reasonably develop, the rule as originally proposed). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Ferroalloys Association, Intervenors
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36-37 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc) (“We must look at the decision not as the chemist, biologist or statistician that we are qualified neither by training nor experience to be, but as a reviewing court exercising our narrowly defined duty of holding agencies to certain minimal standards of rationality.”), cert. de nied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corp.
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Debtor. United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp., United States of America v. Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Regal International, Inc. And John R. Leigh, Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp.
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
American Legion v. Derwinski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 37 (D.C.Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Center for Auto Safety v. The Federal Highway Administration
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 27 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos.
See Shell Oil Co. v. FPC, 520 F. 2d 1061 (CA5 1975) (holding that replacement cost formula appropriate for establishing “just and reasonable” rates under the NGA), cert. denied, 426 U. S. 941 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See 48 Fed.Reg. 14,486 (April 4, 1983). 20 It is not the role of courts to “second-guess the scientific judgments of the EPA,” State of New York v. EPA, 852 F.2d 574, 580 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1065 , 109 S.Ct. 1338 , 103 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989), and we give considerable latitude to the EPA in drawing conclusions from scientific and technological research, even where it is “imperfect” or “preliminary.” Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.1976), cer t. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, (Two Cases)
See 48 Fed.Reg. 14,486 (April 4, 1983). 20 29 It is not the role of courts to "second-guess the scientific judgments of the EPA," State of New York v. EPA, 852 F.2d 574, 580 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1065 , 109 S.Ct. 1338 , 103 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989), and we give considerable latitude to the EPA in drawing conclusions from scientific and technological research, even where it is "imperfect" or "preliminary." Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Horse Protection Association, Inc. v. Clayton Yeutter
See Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (observing that records frequently contain evidence that can be isolated to support "virtually any inference that one might care to draw").
discussed
Cited "see"
American Horse Protection Ass'n v. Yeutter
See Ethyl Corp. v. Envi- ronmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1 , 37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (observing that records frequently contain evidence that can be isolated to support “virtually any inference that one might care to draw”).
cited
Cited "see"
American Mining Congress v. Thomas
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Mining Congress v. Lee M. Thomas
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 63 * The industry petitioners criticize the EPA's change in and justification for: its radon emission standard (allegedly from a risk of lung cancer to a risk of misuse); its linear-nonthreshold calculations of radon risk; and its projected life-savings from the promulgation of the regulations.
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. United States Department of Transportation
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 12 & n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Schlesinger, 609 F.2d 494 (Temp.Emer.
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. The United States Department of Transportation the Federal Aviation Administration Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Individually and as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation J. Lynn Helms, Individually and as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration Frontier Airlines, Inc., a Nevada Corp. Jackson Hole Airport Board, an Agency Organized Under the Laws of the State of Wyoming, Sierra Club, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. The United States Department of Transportation the Federal Aviation Administration Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Individually and as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation J. Lynn Helms, Individually and as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration Western Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Jackson Hole Airport Board, an Agency Organized Under the Laws of the State of Wyoming
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 12 & n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Schlesinger, 609 F.2d 494 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin Oil Service, Inc. v. Koch Refining Co.
See Texaco, Inc. v. Federal *1066 Energy Administration, 531 F.2d 1071, 1076 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Water Transport Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 34 (D.C.Cir.), (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (setting standard of review for agency actions).
cited
Cited "see"
Water Transport Association, and Sea-Land Service, Ltd., New Orleans Traffic and Transportation Bureau, Inc., Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission, Houston Port Bureau, Inc., Grain Transportation Consultants of the Pacific Northwest, Traffic Board of the North Atlantic Ports Association, Intervenors-Appellants v. Interstate Commerce Commission, and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor. National Grain and Feed Association, the Buckeye Feed and Supply, Inc., Bunge Corporation, Cargill, Incorporated, Collingwood Grain, Inc., Demeter, Inc., Louis Dreyfus Corporation, the Pillsbury Company, Union Equity Cooperative Exchange v. United States of America, and Interstate Commerce Commission, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 34 (D.C.Cir.), (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (setting standard of review for agency actions).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Ass'n of Metal Finishers v. Environmental Protection Agency
American Iron & Steel Institute v. EPA (“AISI II”), 568 F.2d 284 , 290-98 (3d Cir.1977); see Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 48 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Marsh
See Grazing Fields, 626 F.2d at 1072 & n. 2. 35 For there to be a “clear error of judgment,” there must be an “error ... so clear as to deprive the agency’s decision of a rational basis.” Almay, Inc. v. Califano, 569 F.2d 674, 680 (D.C.Cir.1977), quoting Ethyl Gorp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 35 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. And Consolidated National Intervenors v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., Intervenors. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Commonwealth Edison Company, Pacific Legal Foundation, Intervenors. The State of New York v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Commonwealth Edison Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., State of Wisconsin, Intervenors. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Commonwealth Edison Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors
Accord, Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (holding that agency may promulgate rules based on qualitative appraisal of risk when scientific knowledge provides no answer to crucial issues of fact). 60 The original S-3 rulemaking record on waste management and reprocessing consisted solely of a twenty-page statement by the Director of the AEC's Division of Waste Management professing confidence that long-term waste disposal would someday be achieved.
discussed
Cited "see"
Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Under this standard, our review is highly deferential and we need satisfy ourselves only that “the agency has exercised a reasoned discretion, with reasons that do not deviate from or ignore the ascertainable legislative intent.” Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 444 F.2d 841 , 850 (D.C.Cir.1970) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 923 , 91 S.Ct. 2229 , 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); see Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 33-37 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Federal Aviation Administration, Ronald W. Haughton, Albert Shanker, Henry B. Frazier, Iii, Leon B. Applewhaite, Intervenors. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Federal Aviation Administration, Intervenor
Under this standard, our review is highly deferential and we need satisfy ourselves only that "the agency has exercised a reasoned discretion, with reasons that do not deviate from or ignore the ascertainable legislative intent." Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 444 F.2d 841 , 850 (D.C.Cir.1970) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 923 , 91 S.Ct. 2229 , 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); see Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 33-37 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord, Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (holding that agency may promulgate rules based on qualitative appraisal of risk when scientific knowledge provides no answer to crucial issues of fact). .The original S-3 rulemaking record on waste management and reprocessing consisted solely of a twenty-page statement by the Director of the AEC’s Division of Waste Management professing confidence that long-term waste disposal would someday be achieved.
cited
Cited "see"
Mid-Louisiana Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Shell Oil Co. v. FPC, 520 F.2d 1061 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2661 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward J. Wawszkiewicz v. Department of the Treasury, Edward J. Wawszkiewicz v. Department of the Treasury Edward J. Wawszkiewicz v. Department of the Treasury the Wine Institute
Accord, United States Lines, Inc. v. FMC, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 368 , 584 F.2d 519, 526 (1978) 45 Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 406-407 n.74, 541 F.2d 1 , 34-35 n.74, cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) 46 See text supra at notes 6-7 47 See text supra at notes 34-36 48 See, e.g., Atlantic Ref.
discussed
Cited "see"
Safir v. Klutznick
See Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1 , 37 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Associated Industries of New York States, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, 487 F.2d 342 , 349-350 (2nd Cir. 1973) (Friendly, J.); Scalia & Goodman, Procedural Aspects of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 20 U.C.L.A.L.Rev. 899, 934-35 & nn. 138-39 (1973). 56 .
cited
Cited "see"
Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States
See generally Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 34-37 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
American Paper Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Railway Co. v. United States
See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971), Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Community Nutrition Institute v. Bergland
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 34 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Benn
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) .
cited
Cited "see"
Bonnaffons v. United States Department of Energy
See Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration, 398 F.Supp. 865, 877 (D.D.C.1975), affirmed, 531 F.2d 1071, 1077 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa
See 43 Fed.Reg. 26380-26410 (19 June 1978) 211 See APA § 10(e), 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) (1976) 212 In making this inquiry we follow the standards we set previously in Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 406-08 , 541 F.2d 1, 34-36 (1976), Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976), where we noted that to determine whether agency action is arbitrary or capricious, a reviewing court "must engage in a 'substantial inquiry' into the facts, one that is 'searching and careful,' " and must assure itself that the agency decision was " 'based on …
examined
Cited "see"
National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. Marshall
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 406-408 , 541 F.2d 1 , 34-36, cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
National Industrial Sand Association, a Delaware Corporation, the China Clay Producers, Intervenor v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Robert B. Lagather, Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, the Council of the Southern Mountains, Inc. v. F. Ray Marshall, in His Capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Robert Lagather, in His Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, China Clay Producers, Intervenor
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FCC, 541 F.2d 346 , 356-57 (3d Cir. 1976) (Garth, J., dissenting), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1092 , 97 S.Ct. 1104 , 51 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) 35 Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 408 , 541 F.2d 1 , 36, Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Environmental Quality Council
See, Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971), and Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 541 F.2d 1 , 34-35 fn. 74 (1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 .
examined
Cited "see"
Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pennzoil Producing Co., Intervenor
(4×)
See The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases, supra, 186 U.S.App.D.C. at 66-67 , 567 F.2d at 1059-60 , Quoting Shell Oil Co. v. FPC, 520 F.2d 1061, 1077 (1975), Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2661 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Surface Mining Regulation Litigation
(2×)
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 401 & n. 58, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 & n. 58 cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Amoco Oil Co. v. EPA, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 175, 180-181 , 501 F.2d 722 , 735, 740-41 (1974); Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. Hodgson, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 338-39 , 499 F.2d 467, 474-75 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barrier Industries, Inc. v. Jack M. Eckard
The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” The agency must articulate a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” While we may not supply a reasoned basis for the agency’s action that the agency itself has not given, we will uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned. [Citations omitted.] Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285-86 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 442 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974); accord, Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency,…
cited
Cited "see"
Davis Walker Corp. v. Blumenthal
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 406-407 , 541 F.2d 1 , 34-35 cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2663 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Shell Oil Co. v. FPC, 520 F.2d 1061, 1065 (CA5, 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2661 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Co., a Division of Chevron Oil Co.
v.
Federal Power Commission Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission American Public Gas Assn. v. Federal Power Commission Public Service Commission of New York v. Federal Power Commission Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Power Commission and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission American Public Gas Assn. v. Federal Power Commission Public Service Commission of New York v. Federal Power Commission Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Power Commission and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 75-1289; No. 75-1299; No. 75-1304; No. 75-1305; No. 75-1308; No. 75-1474.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1976.
426 U.S. 941
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.Reported below: 520 F. 2d 1061.