green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Charlie Lee Foster v. Louie L. Wainwright
But see United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hie
See United States v. McNair, 439 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd, 571 F.2d 573 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978); People v. Scott, 93 Misc.2d 1074 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 169 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Howard Butler
Noti, 731 F.2d at 613 ; see United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 505-06 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rance Dwayne Preston
Noti, 731 F.2d at 613 ; see United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 505-06 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Changa
See United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 506 (9th Cir.) (“cross-examination may be necessary where defense counsel seeks to impeach narcotics addicts who are paid government informers with criminal charges pending against them.”), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levasseur
See United States v. McNair, 439 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd, 568 F.2d 771 , 571 F.2d 573 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978); State v. Moulton, 481 A.2d 155 (Maine 1984), aff'd on other grounds, 474 U.S. 159 , 106 S.Ct. 477 , 88 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); People v. Hopkins, 52 Ill.2d 1 , 284 N.E.2d 283 (1972); People v. Scott, 93 Misc.2d 1074 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 169 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1978); 4 W.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank P. Lench
See United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 505-06 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 (1978); Skinner v. Cardwell, 564 F.2d 1381, 1388-89 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 1883 , 56 L.Ed.2d 392 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Stephen Domina
(2×)
See United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 506 (9th Cir.) (cross-examination on drug use may be necessary where the record reveals that drug use may have provided motivation for testifying), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978); United States v. Kinnard, 465 F.2d 566, 571 (D.C.Cir.1972) (Bazelon, C.J., concurring).
cited
Cited "see"
McCarson Ex Rel. Estate of McCarson v. Foreman
See United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Barnes v. Everett W. Jones, Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility and the State of New York
(2×)
See Ennis v. LeFevre, 560 F.2d 1072, 1075 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1625 , 56 L.Ed.2d 70 (1978). 'But the decision to forego potentially meritorious issues on appeal requires as much client input as does the decision whether to appeal in the first instance, see Ennis, 560 F.2d at 1077 (Gurfein, J., concurring) (whether to raise an issue, “if a serious [one], may per haps not be left entirely to the lawyer’s decision”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo Sampol
See United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 ; United States v. Banks, supra; United States v. Holt, 529 F.2d 981 (4th Cir. 1975); United States v. Davis, 486 F.2d 725 (7th Cir. 1973), *668 cert. denied 415 U.S. 979 , 94 S.Ct. 1569 , 39 L.Ed.2d 876 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moore
Accord, United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 506, 506-07 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978); State v. Riles, 355 So.2d 1312, 1313 (La.1978); People v. Harris, 80 Mich.App. 228, 229-30 , 263 N.W.2d 40, 40-41 (1977); State v. Corriz, 86 N.M. 246, 247 , 522 P.2d 793, 795 (1974); State v. Williams, 11 Or.App. 227, 230 , 501 P.2d 328, 330 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
El v. Lamarque
Allen, 397 U.S. at 343 , 90 S.Ct. at 1060-61 ; Badger, 587 F.2d at 973 ; see also United States v. Kizer, 569 F.2d 504, 506-07 (9th Cir.) (defendant was properly removed from courtroom when, after receiving warning, she continued to speak out, interrupting prosecutor’s final argument to jury), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978); Norde v. Keane, 294 F.3d 401, 413 (2d Cir.2002) (defendant not denied his right to be present when removed from courtroom after twice inteiTupting jury selection process with “objections”); Russ v. Israel, 531 F.Supp. 490, 493-95 (E…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Commissiong
See Fed.R.Evid. 901(a); see also United States v. McNair, 439 F.Supp. 103, 105 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd mem., 571 F.2d 573 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mario Antonio Torres-Flores, A/K/A Leopoldo Hernandez-Segovia
See also United States v. Bowers, 567 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1627 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Currier
See also Watkins v. United States, 564 F.2d 201, 205-06 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978) (holding that conviction that had been reversed in subsequent proceeding could not be used to determine whether defendant was a dangerous special offender).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry Felder
See also Watkins v. United States, 564 F.2d 201, 207-08 (6th Cir.1977) (proportionality challenge dismissed as moot), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 976 , 98 S.Ct. 1626 , 56 L.Ed.2d 71 (1978).
Larry Eugene Watkins
v.
United States
v.
United States
77-6344.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1978.
435 U.S. 976
Published
Larry Eugene WATKINS, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 77-6344
Supreme Court of the United States
April 17, 1978
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
1
Denied.