green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.1 score
“of even greater importance is the fact that the agents executing the warrant personally knew which premises were intended to be searched, and those premises were under constant surveillance while the warrant was obtained”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Farnham
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Allen, 596 F.2d 227, 231 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979).
discussed
Cited "but see"
People of the Territory of Guam v. William E. Kingsbury
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Interest of Clay, 246 N.W.2d 263, 265 (Iowa 1976) 5 See cases cited in first sentence of footnote 3 supra 6 See State v. Stanley, 60 Haw. 527 , 592 P.2d 422, 425-26 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979); State v. Harwood, 98 Idaho 793 , 572 P.2d 1228, 1230 (1977); People v. Chi Ko Wong, 18 Cal.3d 698 , 135 Cal.Rptr. 392 , 557 P.2d 976, 983-85 (1976), overruled on another ground sub nom.
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. William Archie Williams
But see United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 860 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United *1316 States v. Southers, 583 F.2d 1302, 1305 (5th Cir. 1978).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Nathan Wagoner
of even greater importance is the fact that the agents executing the warrant personally knew which premises were intended to be searched, and those premises were under constant surveillance while the warrant was obtained
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyson Baker
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 858 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979) (discussing 18 U.S.C. § 656 , and stating that “it is sufficient that the defendant at least temporarily deprive[d] the [government] of the possession, control or use of its funds” and that “[s]ubsequent restitution … is not a defense since the crime [of embezzlement or theft] is complete when the misapplication occurs”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyson Baker
See United States v. Duncan , 598 F.2d 839 , 858 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (discussing 18 U.S.C. § 656 , and stating that "it is sufficient that the defendant at least temporarily deprive[d] the [government] of the possession, control or use of its funds" and that "[s]ubsequent restitution ... is not a defense since the crime [of embezzlement or theft] is complete when the misapplication occurs").
discussed
Cited "see"
Huber v. North Carolina State University
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 854 (4th Cir. 1979) (holding that Congress had the constitutional authority to enact 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (l)(b)(iv) under the Commerce Clause), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peoples
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Burroughs, 564 F.2d 1111, 1113-14 (4th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Town of Chapel Hill, N.C.
Vol. 4 at 3-5); see United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 864 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Town of Chapel Hill
Vol. 4 at 3-5); see United States v. Duncan , 598 F.2d 839, 864 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams-Davis
See United States v. Griffith, 756 F.2d 1244, 1251 (6th Cir.) (citing United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 866 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 837 , 106 S.Ct. 114 , 88 L.Ed.2d 93 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gambino
See United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369, 371 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, California
See Shaw v. Martin, 733 F.2d 304, 313 (4th Cir.) (defendant was not entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing on his contention that South Carolina’s death penalty statute was discriminatorily applied because “[t]he proffered evidence would not have been of sufficient probative value on the issue of discriminatory intent to have required response, and no evidentiary hearing was therefore required”) (citing United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 869 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 , 105 S.Ct. 230 , 83 L.Ed.2d 159 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 893, 26 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 860 United States of America v. Carol G. Unruh, William L. Fowler, Robert Hopper, Stephen C. Forde, Defendants
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 858 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Potter v. State
See United States v. Allen, 596 F.2d 227, 232 (7th Cir.) (defendant with $25,000 annual income found not indigent), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, California
See Shaw v. Martin, 733 F.2d 304, 313 (4th Cir.) (defendant was not entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing on his contention that South Carolina’s death penalty statute was discriminatorily applied because “[t]he proffered evidence would not have been of sufficient probative value on the issue of discriminatory intent to have required response, and no evidentiary hearing was therefore required”) (citing United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 869 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 , 105 S.Ct. 230 , 83 L.Ed.2d 159 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Alan Morgenstern and Frederick Earl Morgenstern
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 858 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979). 20 The Morgensterns contend initially that the evidence was insufficient to establish that they possessed the requisite intent to injure or defraud the bank.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. J. Murray Hooker, II
(2×)
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Stefan, 784 F.2d 1093 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 193 , 93 L.Ed.2d 125 (1986); United States v. Arteaga-Limones, 529 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920 , 97 S.Ct. 315 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976); United States v. Johnson, 414 F.2d 22 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 991 , 90 S.Ct. 1112 , 25 L.Ed.2d 399 (1970).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
(3×)
See United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 70-71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); but see United States v. Tobias, 836 F.2d 449 (9th Cir.1988) (in Ninth Circuit, Section 641 held inapplicable to intangibles).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Sarsoun
(2×)
See United States v. Allen, 596 F.2d 227, 232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979) (defendant earning over $25,000 annually was not entitled to free legal services).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guadalupe Alcantar
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 858 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Landers, 576 F.2d 94, 96 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Scheper, 520 F.2d 1355, 1358 (4th Cir.1975); United States v. Fortunato, 402 F.2d 79, 81 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 933 , 89 S.Ct. 1205 , 22 L.Ed.2d 463 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Unruh
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 858 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert A. Greenwood
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 869 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Edward Cole, United States of America v. Hubert Winston Craig
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 848 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (standard for sufficient indictment).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walls
See U.S. v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 848 (4th Cir.1979) cert. denied 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Loyd, William Harrison Hood, A/K/A Wayne Tabone, A/K/A Billie Wooten, Donald Lewis Canup, James Douglas Hume
See United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369, 372 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Mendel, 578 F.2d 668, 673-74 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 964 , 99 S.Ct. 450 , 58 L.Ed.2d 422 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Fortunato, 402 F.2d 79 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 933 , 89 S.Ct. 1205 , 22 L.Ed.2d 463 (1969). 121 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Monroe Hill
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 866 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (law books); cf. United States v. Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192, 193 , 193 n.1 (9th Cir. 1979) (extrinsic evidence); United States v. Marx, 485 F.2d 1179, 1184 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 986 , 94 S.Ct. 2391 , 40 L.Ed.2d 764 (1974); Paz v. United States, 462 F.2d 740, 745 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 820 , 94 S.Ct. 115 , 38 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973); United States v. Adams, 385 F.2d 548, 550-51 (2nd Cir. 1967); Osborne v. United States, 351 F.2d 111, 118-19 (8th …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Napolitano
See United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie A. Brooks
United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 914 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); accord, United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 866 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 971, 9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 240 United States of America v. Inocenio Guterrez Perez, AKA Jose Perez, and Jose De Jesus Ruvalcaba- Villalobos
See United States v. Watkins, 600 F.2d 201, 204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979). 12 In this case there is abundant evidence other than the coconspirators' statements independently establishing the existence of the conspiracy.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Perez
See Unit ed States v. Watkins, 600 F.2d 201, 204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. Buras
See United States v. Watkins, 600 F.2d 201, 205 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Kelly Robinson
See United States v. Roundtree, 596 F.2d 672 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Ballard, 573 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1978). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Look
See United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 847 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979); United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1205-1206 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 (1974); People v. Santos, 26 Cal. App. 3d 397, 402 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dost v. State
See eg., United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (finding warrant sufficient although only description of location to be searched was incorrect street address, it was unlikely wrong premises would be searched because incorrect address did not exist and agents executing warrant personally knew location to be searched); see also, State v. Dye, 250 Kan. 287 , 826 P.2d 500 (1992) 3 (holding that search warrant, which was lacking sufficient description of premises and did not have affidavit attached, was not fatally defective …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Timmy Allen Rice, United States of America v. Marcus Tyrone McHam United States of America v. Ronald Eugene Rice, United States of America v. Jerrell Lamar Meadows, United States of America v. John W. Stevens, United States of America v. Peggy Jean Rice, United States of America v. Henry A. Rice, United States of America v. Delton Scott Stevens
See, e.g., United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 849 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
United States v. Jeter, 775 F.2d 670, 680-82 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 1796 , 90 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986); see also United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 70-71 (2d Cir.) (information in DEA computer records was a “thing of value” sold in violation of § 641), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076, 1087 (9th Cir.) (information in transcripts as to grand jury proceedings held to be a “thing of value”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
United States v. Jeter, 775 F.2d 670, 680-82 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1142 (1986); see also United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 70-71 (2d Cir.) (information in DEA computer records was a "thing of value" sold in violation of Sec. 641), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076, 1087 (9th Cir.) (information in transcripts as to grand jury proceedings held to be a "thing of value"), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Fournier
See, e.g., United States v. Git-cho, 601 F.2d 369, 372 (8th Cir.1979) cert. *1180 denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); State v. Liberti, 161 N.J.Super. 575 , 392 A.2d 169, 172 (App.Div.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Berlin
See, e.g., U.S. v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); U.S. v. Morison, 604 F.Supp. 655 (D.Md.), appeal dismissed, 774 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Valentine Tomaszewski
Id. at 1299 ; see United States v. Lehmann, 798 F.2d 692, 694 (4th Cir.1986) (probable cause found where defendant had bulge below the belt and attempted to conceal it with his jacket); see also United States v. Roundtree, 596 F.2d 672, 674 (5th Cir.) (reasonable suspicion established where defendant had bulge on inside of his calf which he was seen “adjusting”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Hardin, Sr. (84-5643), Eugene Hardin, Jr. (84-5644) Paul A. Bisic, Jr. (84-5736) Norvin E. Green, III (84-5737)
See, e.g., United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369, 372 (8th Cir.) (permissible factor in upholding search warrant is fact that premises had previously been under surveillance), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Griffith (82-1485), Gerald L. McKay (82-1495), Frank Ross Reynolds, III (82-1496)
Id. at 670-71; see also United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 866 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Gunter, 546 F.2d 861, 869 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 947 , 97 S.Ct. 1583 , 51 L.Ed.2d 794 , 431 U.S. 920 , 97 S.Ct. 2189 , 53 L.Ed.2d 232 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Emile Mitchell Robin
See also United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (consolidation in one count of unlawful sale and receipt of records of four individuals in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 proper); United States v. Pavlovski, 574 F.2d 933 (7th Cir.1978) (consolidation in one count of charges of embezzlement by presenting forged checks to bank and by converting cash dues and initiation fees belonging to union proper); Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967) (consolid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Nick Regilio and Guillermo Saint Blancard
See, e.g., United States v. Allen, 596 F.2d 227, 230 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979); United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433, 442 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Mitchell Newman
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Kent, 608 F.2d 542, 544-45 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 936 , 100 S.Ct. 2153 , 64 L.Ed.2d 788 (1980); Abbott v. United States, 239 F.2d 310, 313-14 (5th Cir.1956); United States v. Buckner, 108 F.2d 921, 926-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 669 , 60 S.Ct. 613 , 84 L.Ed. 1016 (1940).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. E. A. Gregory and Vonna Jo Gregory, G. W. Atkinson and Robert T. Spurlock, Jr.
See, e. g., United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 869 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Brown, 591 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2831 , 61 L.Ed.2d 280 (1979); United States v. Bourque, 541 F.2d 290, 292-93 (1st Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sugar
The disclosure or use of illegally intercepted communications is subject to the same punishment. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2511 (l)(c), (d); N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-3b, c; see also United States v. Duncan, 598 F.2d 839, 847 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. McIntyre, 582 F.2d 1221, 1224-1225 (9th Cir. 1978); Kratz v. Kratz, 477 F.Supp. 463, 477-480 (E.D.Pa. 1979); State v. McCartin, 135 N.J.Super. 81 (Law Div. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watkins
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.