green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.6 score
“well established doctrine regarding the appealability of interlocutory orders suggests that the burden of incurring a contempt citation is not an unreasonable one to impose on a party seeking review of a question that will otherwise become moot”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
But see United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 725 (1st Cir.) (requiring party objecting to subpoena to incur contempt sanction in order to obtain review), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980). 1 First, there is an obvious and important need for prompt response to federal grand jury subpoenas.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Grabinski
But see United States v. Crowhurst, 629 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir.) (a signed 1040 form with W-2 forms attached is a return for purposes of filing a false return in violation of § 7206(1) even though the form is blank), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Acosta
it is well settled that observations made by law enforcement officials from the common areas of multi-unit dwellings ordinarily do not violate a resident's reasonable expectation of privacy
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cronin v. Strayer
well established doctrine regarding the appealability of interlocutory orders suggests that the burden of incurring a contempt citation is not an unreasonable one to impose on a party seeking review of a question that will otherwise become moot
discussed
Cited "see"
Xelan, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 725, 727-28 (1st *463 Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); In Re Greene, 50 B.R. 785, 787 (S.D.N.Y.1985); but see In re Spencer, 123 B.R. 858, 862-63 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Cal.1991) (disagreeing with In Re Greene 's conclusion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Xélan, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 725, 727-28 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); In Re Greene, 50 B.R. 785, 787 (S.D.N.Y.1985); but see In re Spencer, 123 B.R. 858, 862-63 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Cal.1991) (disagreeing with In Re Greene’s conclusion).
cited
Cited "see"
Xelan, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 725, 728 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); In re Greene, 50 B.R. 785, 787 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Xĕlan, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 725, 728 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021, 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); In re Greene, 50 B.R. 785, 787 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. City of Seven Points
See Slavin v. Curry, 574 F.2d 1256, 1264-65 (5th Cir. 1978), overruled on other grounds, Sparks v. Duval County Ranch Co., Inc., 604 F.2d 976 , 978 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald P. Rohrig
(2×)
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 70 (7th Cir.) (“[T]he limitless array of factual settings that may arise caution against a checklist-type analysis.”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Mitchell Casey
See United States v. Crowhurst, 629 F.2d 1297, 1301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 (1980)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Calles
See Shah v. United States, 878 F.2d 1156, 1160 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 (1989). 7 We do not address the claims in Calles's pro se pleading because he is represented by counsel, see United States v. Crowhurst, 629 F.2d 1297, 1301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 (1980), and because he did not present these issues in his § 2255 motion in the district court, see United States v. Johnson, 988 F.2d 941, 945 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Charles Fragoso
Gonzalez, 700 F.2d at 200 (jury instructed that it could convict Gonzales if he “knew that there was some controlled substance in the car, whether or not he knew it was actually heroin or some other drug or narcotic”); see United States v. Rada-Solano, 625 F.2d 577, 579 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William W. Boden
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 , 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cattouse
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); Donaldson, supra, 606 F.Supp. at 332 . *487 For these reasons, although I do not find there was a “likelihood” that Cattouse would have escaped — or even simply left unnoticed — in the 20-30 minutes it would have taken to secure a telephone warrant, I also believe the agents were faced with a growing danger of escape or hostile confrontation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian G. Altman
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Moore, 790 F.2d 13 (1st Cir.1986); United States v. Wulferdinger, 782 F.2d 1473 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hicks, 752 F.2d 379 (9th Cir.1985); see generally Project, Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-85, 74 Geo.
discussed
Cited "see"
Center For Auto Safety v. Ruckelshaus
See Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.2d 865, 886-87 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980). 16 The degree of deference appropriate here, therefore, is modest--no more than that thoughtful respect we should give to the views of the officers of another branch who have been officially presented with the issue and who, like us, have taken an oath to apply the law that Congress enacted.
cited
Cited "see"
Center for Auto Safety v. Ruckelshaus
See Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.2d 865, 886-87 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lowell John Pajari
See United States v. Anderson, 627 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 60-63 , 77 S.Ct. 623, 627-629 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68 , 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Penco, 612 F.2d 19, 24-25 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Eisler, 567 F.2d 814, 816 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Shima, 545 F.2d 1026, 1029 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct. 632 , 54 L.Ed.2d 490 (1977); United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977); United States v. Cruz Pagan, 537 …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Richards
See United States v. Anderson, 627 F.2d 161, 163 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewand v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 722 (1st Cir. 1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 (1980) (Because appellant “has produced all of the documents forming the subject matter of this appeal, the controversy presented to this court appears, on its face, to be moot.”); Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468, 1479 (9th Cir. 1992) (“Compliance with a discovery order renders moot an appeal of that order.”); Baldridge v. United States, 406 F.2d 526, 527 (5th Cir. 1969) (Where appellant complied with the court order enforcing subpoena, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
See, e.g., United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 725 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); United States v. Deak-Perera Int'l Banking Corp., 610 F.2d 89 , 89 (2d Cir.1979); Kurshan v. Riley, 484 F.2d 952, 952-53 (4th Cir.1973) (per curiam); United States v. Sherlock, 756 F.2d 1145, 1146-47 (5th Cir.1985); United States v. Patmon, 630 F.2d 458, 459 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam); United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-34 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Equity Farmers E…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kersting
See, e.g., United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 725 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); United States v. Deak-Perera Int'l Banking Corp., 610 F.2d 89 , 89 (2d Cir.1979); Kurshan v. Riley, 484 F.2d 952, 952-53 (4th Cir.1973) (per curiam); United States v. Sherlock, 756 F.2d 1145, 1146-47 (5th Cir.1985); United States v. Patmon, 630 F.2d 458, 459 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam); United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-34 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Equity Farmers …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See Ramsey v. United Mine Workers of America, 481 F.2d 742, 753 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1067 , 94 S.Ct. 576 , 38 L.Ed.2d 473 (1973); see also United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 454 F.Supp. 1077 , 1096-97 n. 10 (E.D.Va.1978), rev'd in part on other grounds, 620 F.2d 1018 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980). 25 .To the extent that this Court did not consider the “notebook data presented by Phillips" at trial, see DuPont, 849 F.2d 1436 , Phillips was nonetheless permitted to introduce the evidence at trial and was in no way hindered…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel v. Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve Ploense
Llaguno, 763 F.2d at 1564 ; see also United States v. Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 70 (7th Cir.), certiorari denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 587 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Elliott and Joseph Defley v. Leander H. Perez, Jr., Etc., Eugene E. Leon, Jr., Etc., and Frank Klein
(2×)
See also Slotnick v. Staviskey, 560 F.2d 31 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1077 , 98 S.Ct. 1268 , 55 L.Ed.2d 783 (1978) (complaints cannot survive motion to dismiss if they contain conclusory allegations but do not support their claims with references to material facts), cited with approval in Sparks v. Duval County Ranch Co., 604 F.2d 976, 978 (5th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 943 , 100 S.Ct. 1339 , 63 L.Ed.2d 777 and 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 , aff’d on other grounds sub nom; Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 , 101 S.Ct. 183 , 66 L.Ed.2d 185 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Litigation Authority of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Title VII Suits Against State and Local Governmental Entities
See also U nited States v. Commonwealth o f Virginia, 620 F.2d 1018 , 1022 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1021 (1980); United States v. Fresno Unified School District, 592 F.2d at 109293; United States v. State o f North Carolina, 587 F.2d 625 (4th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 442 U.S. 909 (1979).13 II.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dothan, Alabama v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Intervenor
(2×)
See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.2d 865, 889 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Young & Company, and Amerada Hess Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent-Appellant
Compare United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 474 F.Supp. 322 (D.Mass.1979), appeal dismissed as moot, 623 F.2d 720 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980), with United States v. Coopers & Lybrand, 413 F.Supp. 942 (D.Colo.1975), aff'd, 550 F.2d 615 (10th Cir. 1977). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crowhurst
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-5628.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.