Memorex Corp. v. Int'l Bus. Machines Corp., 452 U.S. 972 (1981). · Go Syfert
Memorex Corp. v. Int'l Bus. Machines Corp., 452 U.S. 972 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Memorex II”
93 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp. (paed, 1988-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
E.D. Pa. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
memorex ii
cited Cited "see" Daniels v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See McMorris v. State , 394 So.2d 392 , 402 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980), cert. denied, 394 So.2d 404 (Ala.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3127 , 69 L.Ed.2d 983 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
D. Ariz. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. IBM Corp., 458 F.Supp. 423, 436 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff 'd sub nom., Memorex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 636 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3126 , 69 L.Ed.2d 983 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Monfort of Colorado, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
D. Colo. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Memorex Corp. v. I.B.M., 458 F.Supp. 423, 429 (C.D.Cal.1978), aff' d., 636 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3126 , 69 L.Ed.2d 983 (1981); In re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust Litigation, 481 F.Supp. 965, 985 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff'd., 698 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir.1983). *698 In the instant case, the court finds that the existence of nonfed cattle slaughtering plants is not a significant competitive check on fed cattle slaughterers’ pricing activities.
discussed Cited "see" Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. IBM Corp., 458 F.Supp. 423, 439 (N.D.Cal.1978) (discussing technological innovations by alleged monopolist), aff'd sub nom., Memorex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 636 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3126 , 69 L.Ed.2d 983 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. IBM Corp., 458 F.Supp. 423, 439 (N.D.Cal.1978) (discussing technological innovations by alleged monopolist), aff’d sub nom., Memorex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 636 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3126 , 69 L.Ed.2d 983 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McMorris v. *760 State, 394 So.2d 392 (Ala.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied, 394 So.2d 404 (Ala.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3127 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 983 (1981); Liptroth v. State, 335 So.2d 683 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 335 So.2d 688 (Ala.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 963 , 97 S.Ct. 393 , 50 L.Ed.2d 332 (1976); State v. Simpson; Hardin v. State.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marino-Garcia
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Layton, 509 F.Supp. 212 , 216 n. 5 (N.D.Cal.1981), appeal dismissed, 645 F.2d 681 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 3128 , 69 L.Ed.2d 984 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Memorex Corp.
v.
International Business Machines Corp.
No. 80-1884.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1981.
452 U.S. 972
Blackmun, Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Trans-america Computer Co., Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.