green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Maza
implicity, (sic) enhancement proceedings such as this texas proceeding, where there are findings of fact similar to the findings in the guilt phase of the trial, are ... within the penumbra .
cited
Cited "see"
In re M.E.
See In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394 , 293 S.E.2d 127 , reh'g denied, 306 N.C. 565 (1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re ME
See In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394 , 293 S.E.2d 127 , reh'g denied, 306 N.C. 565 (1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royce E. Denton v. Jack R. Duckworth
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983). 2 He next contends that this is a case where the prior finding of habitual offender status was reversed on sufficiency of the evidence grounds, and not for trial error.
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Williamson
See In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394, 404 , 293 S.E. 2d 127, 132 (1982), appeal dismissed, *679 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 987 (1983); In re Stewart Children, 82 N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Bullabough
See In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394, 400 , 293 S.E. 2d 127, 130-31 (1982) (court applied Rule 58 to determine time of entry of order in termination of parental rights cases), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1139 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 987 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
James Leggins v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Bullard v. Estelle, 502 F.Supp. 887, 894 (N.D.Tex.1980), aff'd 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. New York
See, e. g., Durosko v. Lewis, 882 F. 2d 357, 359 (CA9 1989), cert. denied, 495 U. S. 907 (1990), and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F. 2d 1347, 1361 (CA5 1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U. S. 1139 (1983), both cases holding that double jeopardy analysis applies in sentence enhancement proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. New York
See, e. g., Durosko v. Lewis, 882 F. 2d 357, 359 (CA9 1989), cert. denied, 495 U. S. 907 (1990), and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F. 2d 1347, 1361 (CA5 1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U. S. 1139 (1983), both cases holding that double jeopardy analysis applies in sentence enhancement proceedings.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Caldwell
See e.g., In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394 , 293 S.E. 2d 127 (1982) (violent, likely sexual, abuse), appeal dismissed sub nom., Moore v. Guilford County Dept. of Social Services, 459 U.S. 1139 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dyer, a Minor, by Dyer, her Parent and Natural Guardian
v.
Lower Bucks County Hospital
v.
Lower Bucks County Hospital
No. 82-5714.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (1)
Appeal from Super. Ct. Pa. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.