green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hermes Automation Technology, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.
But see New England Merchants National Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467 , 472 n. 9 (5th Cir.1982) (stating that in Massachusetts, the common law rule “remains applicable to contract cases”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
UCB, Inc. v. Mylan Technologies Inc.
See Smith v. Lehman, 689 F.2d 342, 346 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 (1983) (“[S]ummary judgment is inappropriate where a triable issue of material fact exists concerning the interpretation and possible ambiguity of private agreements entered into between parties|.]”’) (citing Heyman v. Com. & Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jandro v. State
(2×)
See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F.2d 948 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Bouck and Corey Day
See United States v. Gay, 774 F.2d 368 (10th Cir.1985), wherein we stated that "the quantity of the drug possessed is a circumstance which may permit inference that the possessor intended to sell, deliver, or otherwise distribute.” Id. at 372 (citing United States v. Dufriend, 691 F.2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Norman Gay
See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F.2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Espinosa
See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F.2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983) (intent to distribute inferred from 600 pounds of marijuana).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Espinosa
See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F.2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983) (intent to distribute inferred from 600 pounds of marijuana).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walsh v. Suffolk County Police Department
Suggesting that an individual engaged in factually undisputed conduct by mistake “is not enough to raise an issue about the substantial accuracy of [a] report.” Id.; see also Smith v. Lehman, 689 F.2d 342, 345-46 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walsh v. Suffolk County Police Department
Suggesting that an individual engaged in factually undisputed conduct by mistake “is not enough to raise an issue about the substantial accuracy of [a] report.” Id.; see also Smith v. Lehman, 689 F.2d 342, 345-46 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judy Portis v. First National Bank of New Albany, Ms
FNB further argues that Portis’ testimony cannot overcome the quantum of evidence provided by FNB because it is “self-serving and speculative testimony ... subject to especially searching scrutiny.” Elliott, 714 F.2d at 564; See also New England Merchants Nat’l Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir.1982) (rejecting "unsupported self-serving testimony that flies in the teeth of unimpeachable contradictory evidence and universal experience”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983); Ralston Purina Co. v. Hobson, 554 F.2d 725, 728-29 (5th Cir.1977) …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
T & B Scottdale Contractors, Inc. v. United States
See also CTI-Container Leasing Corp. v. Uiterwyk Corp., 685 F.2d 1284, 1287 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
T & B Scottdale Contractors, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Trust Company Bank, Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, Richard D. Ellenberg, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Rodger & Rodger, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee. In Re Rodger & Rodger, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Rodger & Rodger, Inc.
See also CTI-Container Leasing Corp. v. Uiterwyk Corp., 685 F.2d 1284, 1287 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Earl Davis
See, e.g., New England Merchants National Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (plaintiff’s testimony contradicted by “unimpeachable” witnesses and documentary evidence), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983); Ralston Purina Co. v. Hobson, 554 F.2d 725, 729 (5th Cir.1977) (plaintiff’s testimony “thoroughly discredited by the testimony of both expert poultry nuitritionists ... and physical facts”); cf. Comfort Trane Air Conditioning v. Trane Co., 592 F.2d 1373 , 1383 (5th Cir.1979) (overwhelming contradictory evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rosenfield
v.
New England Merchants National Bank
v.
New England Merchants National Bank
No. 82-924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.