green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
14.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1999 ·
…he acceptance of a retainer by a lawyer in a criminal case cannot become functionally equivalent to the lawyer's acceptance of a roving commission to flout the criminal law with impunity. a criminal lawyer has no license to act as a lawyer-criminal.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Baum
(2×)
he acceptance of a retainer by a lawyer in a criminal case cannot become functionally equivalent to the lawyer's acceptance of a roving commission to flout the criminal law with impunity. a criminal lawyer has no license to act as a lawyer-criminal.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Wilson
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
The First Circuit explained: “[A]ny act by any party—whether lawful or unlawful on its face—may [constitute obstruction of justice] if performed with a corrupt - 26 - motive.” Id. at 991.
discussed
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 896 , 108 S.Ct. 228 , 229, 98 L.Ed.2d 187 and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 987 , 108 S.Ct. 506 , 98 L.Ed.2d 504 (1987). 8 The question arises, therefore, whether French’s testimony was against his pecuniary or proprietary interest in that it could have led to civil liability under the federal antitrust laws.
cited
Cited "see"
Carl H. Priddy v. Office of Personnel Management
See Whalen v. Office of Personnel Management, 959 F.2d 924, 926-27 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Mabry, United States of America v. Calvin Cornelius Edwards, United States of America v. Mark Anthony Clearman, United States of America v. David L. Edwards
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1084 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 896 , 108 S.Ct. 229 , 98 L.Ed.2d 187 , 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mabry
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1084 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 896 , 108 S.Ct. 229 , 98 L.Ed.2d 187 , 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young in HONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHILDREN’S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 1001 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); Calhoun v. Baylor, 646 F.2d 1158, 1162 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Cobb and Jack R. Cobb
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1084 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987) (district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for severance which was accompanied by the affidavit of the movant's counsel, but not by an affida *159 vit of the co-defendant who was expected to testify).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Cobb
(2×)
See Abbott v. Wainwright, 616 F.2d 889, 889-90 (5th Cir. 1980). 12 v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072 , 1084 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S. Ct. 259 , 98 L.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Joseph Maravilla, United States v. Rafael Jesus Dominguez
(4×)
See United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 262 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-Villafane
See United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 989 (1st Cir.) (trier not bound to accept self-serving stories of persons accused), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); cf. Wright, 873 F.2d at 442-444 (no clear error where district court debunked appellant’s statement anent comparative role in criminal scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
46 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1776, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,942 in Re Inez Jeanette Lewis. Inez Jeanette Lewis, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-Appellant
See Beauford v. Sisters of Mercy-Province of Detroit, Inc., 816 F.2d 1104 , 1108 n. 3 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 217 (1987) 7 According to Sears' brief at p. 39, this figure was derived by calculating an $11,324 per year salary (one-half of Lewis' 1983 earnings based on testimony that Lewis' salary would have been reduced by half if she had been transferred to another department), for twenty-one months ($19,817), plus $2,264 in lost benefits, minus severance pay and interim earnings of $6,668.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William R. Hooks
See United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1095 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Beauford v. Sisters of Mercy-Province of Detroit, Inc., 816 F.2d 1104 , 1108 n. 3 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 217 (1987). .
cited
Cited "see"
Walber Construction Co. v. Department of Hud
See Beauford v. Sisters of Mercy-Province of Detroit, Inc., 816 F.2d 1104 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 217 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Richard Dilworth
See also United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 1002 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 (1987) (law enforcement privilege precludes disclosure of confidential information concerning placement of electronic surveillance devices).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Vaccari
See also United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980 , 988 n.5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 (1987). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Commonwealth of MA
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 ___ ____ _____________ _______ F.2d 980, 1002 (1st Cir.) (recognizing "qualified privilege against compelled government disclosure of sensitive investigative techniques"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 _____________ (1987).1 Following a hearing, the district court agreed that the grand jury transcripts need not be disclosed, but ordered that all non-grand-jury materials be produced subject to a protective order.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Commonwealth of MA
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 1002 (1st Cir.) (recognizing “qualified privilege against compelled government disclosure of sensitive investigative techniques”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987). 1 Following a hearing, the district court agreed that the grand jury transcripts need not be disclosed, but ordered that all non-grand-jury materials be produced subject to a protective order.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Love v. Butler
Under these circumstances, we think it clear that one who decamps in the middle of a trial without notifying his counsel, who flees to another part of the country, and who resurfaces only when arrested for a new offense, "is a person who should know that [the statute's] language applies to him." United States v. Buckalew, 859 F.2d 1052, 1054 (1st Cir. 1988); see also United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 997 (1st Cir.) ("On the record before us, there is no doubt that appellant in fact knew--or was chargeable with knowledge--that his conduct fell within the statute's proscriptions."), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Luis Figueroa, United States of America v. Tomas Figueroa, United States of America v. Isabel Rivera-Serrano, United States of America v. Carmen Milagros-Vasquez
(2×)
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(c); see also United States v. Mazza, 792 F.2d 1210, 1215 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086 , 107 S.Ct. 1290 , 94 L.Ed.2d 147 (1987), United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 999 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United State v. Figueroa
(2×)
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(c); see also United States v. Mazza, 792 F.2d 1210, 1215 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086 , 107 S.Ct. 1290 , 94 L.Ed.2d 147 (1987), United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 999 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez Molina
(2×)
“The fact that [a defendant’s] acts appeared not to be illegal when viewed in isolation does not bar his conviction.” United States v. LaChance, 817 F.2d 1491, 1494 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987); see also United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 991-93 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvin Love v. Norman Butler
(2×)
Under these circumstances, we think it clear that one who decamps in the middle of a trial without notifying his counsel, who flees to another part of the country, and who resurfaces only when arrested for a new offense, “is a person who should know that [the statute’s] language applies to him.” United States v. Buckalew, 859 F.2d 1052, 1054 (1st Cir.1988); see also United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 997 (1st Cir.) (“On the record before us, there is no doubt that appellant in fact knew — or was chargeable with knowledge — that his conduct fell within the statute’s proscript…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Ramon Mena
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 989-91 (1st Cir.) (a defendant's intent can be inferred from his conduct, seen in light of all the surrounding circumstances), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); United States v. Vigil-Montanel, 753 F.2d 996, 999 (11th Cir.1985) (similar). 6 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oliver L. North
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 991-93 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); Haldeman, 559 F.2d at 115 n. 229 (approving jury instruction that included statement that " 'corruptly,' as used in [section 1503] simply means having an evil or improper purpose or intent"); United States v. Haas, 583 F.2d 216, 220 (5th Cir.1978) ("The term 'corruptly' [in section 1503] means for an improper motive, or an evil or wicked purpose") (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1788 , 60 L.Ed.2d 240 (1979);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fausto D. Ruiz
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cin-tolo, 818 F.2d 980, 999 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dale Baker, United States of America v. Carnell Miller, United States of America v. Ervin Jackson, United States of America v. Virlin Jackson, United States of America v. Michael Petty, United States of America v. Vincent Beauregard, United States of America v. Frank Noble
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 997-98 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); United States v. Bueno-Risquet, 799 F.2d 804, 813-14 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Markowski, 772 F.2d 358, 366 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018 , 106 S.Ct. 1202 , 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baker
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 997-98 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); United States v. Bueno-Risquet, 799 F.2d 804, 813-14 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Markowski, 772 F.2d 358, 366 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018 , 106 S.Ct. 1202 , 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francisco Flores Perez
See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 1000 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dutton, Warden
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
No. 87-270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.