green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.1 score
“the defendant cannot successfully argue that error is plain in the record when there is no indication in the record that the act upon which error is predicated ever occurred.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Gattis
even a single act of invidious discrimination may form the basis for an equal protection violation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
White v. State
the defendant cannot successfully argue that error is plain in the record when there is no indication in the record that the act upon which error is predicated ever occurred.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).’”’ “Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 915 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff’d, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000) (quoting Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), quoting in turn other cases).” Ex parte Walker, 972 So.2d 737, 742 (Ala.2007). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
McMillan v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).” ’ ” “ ‘Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 915 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000) (quoting Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), quoting in turn other cases).’ “Ex parte Walker, 972 So.2d [737] at 742 [ (Ala.2007) ].” Ex parte Sharp, [Ms. 1080959, December 4, 2009] - So.3d -, - (Ala.2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).’ ” ’ “Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 915 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000) (quoting Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), quoting in turn other cases).” Ex parte Walker, 972 So.2d 737, 742 (Ala.2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1077 , 128 5.Ct. 806, 169 L.Ed.2d 608 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dotch v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).” ’ ” “ ‘Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 915 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000) (quoting Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), quoting in turn other cases).’ “Ex parte Walker, 972 So.2d [737] at 742 [(Ala.2007)].” Ex parte Sharp, [Ms. 1080959, December 4, 2009] — So.3d — (Ala.2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Sharp, 1080959 (Ala. 12-4-2009)
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).’ ” ’ “Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 915 (Ala. Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000) (quoting Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), quoting in turn other cases).” Ex parte Walker, 972 So.2d at 742 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation
See Eastway, 821 F.2d at 125 (the plain language of Rule 11 “establishes that an appropriate ‘sanction’ and ‘a reasonable attorney’s fee’ are not synonymous”) (decided prior to amendment reducing impact of the Rule), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tornheim v. Eason
See Eastway Const. Corp. v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 121 , 123 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987); Harbulak v. County of Suffolk, 654 F.2d 194 (2d Cir.1981); see also Prate v. Freedman, 583 F.2d 42 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' " Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 913 (Ala.Crim.App.1992)." See also Wilson v. State, 777 So.2d 856, 888 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd, 777 So.2d 935 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1097 , 121 S.Ct. 826 , 148 L.Ed.2d 709 (2001); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).’ “Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 913 (Ala.Crim.App.1992).” See also Wilson v. State, 777 So.2d 856, 888 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd, 777 So.2d 935 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1097 , 121 S.Ct. 826 , 148 L.Ed.2d 709 (2001); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.2000).
cited
Cited "see"
McGriff v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
McGriff v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simmons v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' "` Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 914 (1992) ...' " Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala. Cr.App.1994), aff'd, 663 So.2d 999 (Ala.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 995 , 116 S.Ct. 531 , 133 L.Ed.2d 437 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Acklin v. State
See Watkins v. State , 509 So.2d 1071 , 1073 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd on remand, 509 So.2d 1071 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 (1987), and the cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. State
See Watkins v. State, 509 So.2d 1071, 1073 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987), and the cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Perkins v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' " Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 913 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) ...." Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Cr.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Parker
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 516-17 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 309-10 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pressley v. State
See Watkins v. State, 509 So.2d 1071 , 1073 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd on remand, 509 So.2d 1071 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 (1987), and the cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Burgess v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074, 1076-77 (Ala.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' " Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 914 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (second bracketed language added [in Rieber ])." Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Cr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hyde v. State
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' " Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 914 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (second bracketed language added [in Rieber ])." Rieber v. State, 663 So.2d 985, 991 (Ala.Cr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Watkins v. State, 509 So.2d 1071, 1073 (Ala. Cr.App.), aff'd on remand, 509 So.2d 1071 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Penland
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 495-96 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 297-98 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Williams
(2×)
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 496 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 298 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mireles
See Casillas v. State, 733 S.W.2d 158, 168 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), appeal dismissed, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 277 , 98 L.Ed.2d 238 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sussman v. Bank of Israel
See generally Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 253-54 (2d Cir.1985) (“Eastway ”) (citing Schwarzer, Sanctions Under the New Federal Rule 11 — A Closer Look, 104 F.R.D. 181 , 195 (1985) (“Schwarzer, A Closer Look”)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sussman v. Bank Of Israel
See generally Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 253-54 (2d Cir.1985) ("Eastway ") (citing Schwarzer, Sanctions Under the New Federal Rule 11--A Closer Look, 104 F.R.D. 181 , 195 (1985) ("Schwarzer, A Closer Look ")), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rose
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 513 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 307 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rieber v. State
(2×)
See Ex parte Watkins, 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987)." Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 913 (Ala. Crim.App.1992) (second bracketed language added).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moore
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 495-96 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 297-98 (holding that where the theory had not been presented to the trial court and was being raised for the first time on appeal, it was not properly before the appellate court), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Watkins v. State
(2×)
See Watkins v. State , 509 So.2d 1056 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), remanded, 509 So.2d 1064 (Ala.) (for determination of whether belated disclosure of a police report substantially affected the petitioner's right to a fair trial), on remand, 509 So.2d 1067 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), on return to remand, 509 So.2d 1067 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985) (conviction and sentence again affirmed), remanded, 509 So.2d 1071 (Ala.) (for resolution of newly asserted issue of whether venireperson who merely expressed strong disapproval of death penalty was erroneously excused by the granting of a challenge for cause), on remand, 509 …
cited
Cited "see"
Guthrie v. State
See Ex parte Watkins , 509 So.2d 1074 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tucker
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 495-96 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 297-98 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Price
(2×)
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 528 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 316 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Laws
See State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465 , 356 S.E.2d 279 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987); State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656 , 292 S.E.2d 243 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Quick & Reilly, Inc. v. Jacobson
See Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243 (2d Cir.1985) [, cert. denied, [ 484 U.S. 918 ] 108 S.Ct. 269 [ 98 L.Ed.2d 226 ] 1987)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)
Ipcon Collections LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 698 F.3d 58, 63 (2d Cir.2012); see also Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 254 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987) (sanctions can be imposed for filings made for an “improper purpose” even where the attorney conducted a reasonable investigation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McDuffie v. State
See also, Casillas v. State, *213 733 S.W.2d 158, 168 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), appeal dismissed, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 277 , 98 L.Ed.2d 238 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aetna Insurance v. Meeker
See Donaldson, 819 F.2d at 1557 ; see also Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 121 , 122-23 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aetna Insurance Company v. Thomas Meeker, Aetna Insurance Company v. Thomas Meeker, and Peter G. Williams, Thomas Meeker, and Peter G. Williams v. Aetna Insurance Company A/K/A Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Company
See Donaldson, 819 F.2d at 1557 ; see also Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 121 , 122-23 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated
See, e.g., Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 254 (2d Cir.1985) (“Eastway I”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanders
See, e.g., State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 514 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 308 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harb v. Gallagher
Id.; see also, Eastway Const. Corp. v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 121 , 122, cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis.
See, e.g., Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 254 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987) (Rule 11 is violated when it is "patently clear that a claim has absolutely no chance of success under the existing precedents").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quadrozzi v. City of New York
Compare Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 254 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987) (good faith no longer provides a “safe harbor” from sanctions) with Nemeroff v. Abelson, 620 F.2d 339, 350 (2d Cir.1980) (subjective bad faith standard applied).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Encalade
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 87-439.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1987.
484 U.S. 918
Appeal from Ct. App. La., 4th Cir., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.