green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
DE DAVID v. Alaron Trading Corp.
a federal court in a federal question case is not implementing any state's policy; it exercises the power of the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
Veritas Operating Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.
(2×)
See Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., 833 F.2d 1575, 1577 , 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1935, 1937 (Fed.Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Poffenbarger
See In re General Coffee Corporation, 828 F.2d 699, 701-04 (11th Cir.1987) (applying Florida law), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); Putnam v. Putnam, 274 Ala. 472 , 150 So.2d 209, 213 (Alabama Supreme Court holding that a constructive trust "arises when the legal title to property is obtained by one in violation, express or implied, of some duty owed to one who is equitably entitled thereto, and when the property thus obtained is held in hostility to his beneficiary’s right of ownership"); In re Vermont Real Estate Investment Trust, 25 B.R. 813, 816-17 (B…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Aloisi
Holmes Equip., Inc., 553 So.2d at 750 (“a bona fide judgment creditor cannot have his debt satisfied out of property held by the judgment debtor as trustee under a resulting trust”) 15 ; see generally In re General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699 , 706-07 & n. 9 (11th Cir.1987) (determining in the context of priorities in bankruptcy that a constructive trust would prevail over a hypothetical ideal lienholder, reasoning that a constructive trust beneficiary “could have done nothing in advance to protect his interest from a future lienholder because a constructive trust is created by equity to …
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuji MacHine Manufacturing Co. v. Hover-Davis, Inc.
See Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., Inc., 833 F.2d 1575 , 1579 n. 12 (Fed.Cir.1987) (whether defendant’s product had substantial noninfringing use raised fact question to be determined on remand), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988) The parties’ experts also disagree about the extent to which the use of a Hover-Davis tape feeder with a Fuji chip placement machine includes the elements of the ’136 patent.
cited
Cited "see"
Malkin v. United States
See West v. Federal Aviation Admin., 830 F.2d 1044 , 1046 (9th Cir.1987) cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Old Republic National Title Insurance v. Tyler (In Re Dameron)
See City Nat’l Bank of Miami v. General Coffee Corp. (In re General Coffee Corp.), 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); Mid-Atlantic Supply, Inc. of Va. v. Three Rivers Aluminum Co. (In re Mid-Atlantic Supply Co.), 790 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir.1986); Citizens Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.
Imposition of such “constructive trust arises at the time of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the duty to reconvey the property.” Central Trust Co. v. Shepard (In re Shepard), 29 B.R. 928, 932 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1983); accord City Nat’l Bank of Miami v. General Coffee Corp. (In re General Coffee Corp.), 828 F.2d 699, 702 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of Morrison’s Estate, 800 F.2d 424 , 427 n. 5 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Fontana, 528 F.Supp. 137, 146 (S.D.N.Y.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis Mfg. v. Plasti-Clip
However, the weight of authority indicates that "[a] constructive trust arises at the time of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the duty to reconvey the property." In re Shepard, supra, 29 B.R. at 932 ; accord City Na t '1 Bank v. General Coffee Corp. (In re General Coffee Corp.), 828 F.2d 699, 702 (11th Cir. 1987) ("constructive trust arises when the facts giving rise to the fraud occur"), cert, denied, 485 U.S. 1007 (1988); Capitol Investors Co. v. Executors of Morrison's Estate, 800 F.2d 424 , 427 n.5 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); United States v. Fontana, 528 F. Supp. 137, 146 (S.D.N.Y…
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.
However, the weight of authority indicates that “[a] constructive trust arises at the time of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the duty to reconvey the property.” In re Shepard, supra, 29 B.R. at 932 ; accord City Nat’l Bank v. General Coffee Corp. (In re General Coffee Corp.), 828 F.2d 699, 702 (11th Cir.1987) (“constructive trust arises when the facts giving rise to the fraud occur”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of Morrison’s Estate, 800 F.2d 424 , 427 n. 5 (4th Cir.1986) (same); United States…
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Metals and Minerals Corp. v. Alexander's Unity MV
Thus, the Court concluded, “a manufacturer in a commercial relationship has no duty under either a negligence or strict products-liability theory to prevent a product from injuring itself.” Id. at 871 , 106 S.Ct. at 2302 ; accord Shipco 2295, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 825 F.2d 925, 927 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
See Kronfeld v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 832 F.2d 726, 731-32 (2d Cir.1987), 4 cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
See Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671-72 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.
See Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., 833 F.2d 1575, 1578 (Fed.Cir.1987), cer t. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
See United States v. Crespo, 834 F.2d 267, 271 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S. Ct. 1471 , 99 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Murray v. Sevier
See Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Karshan v. Mattituck Inlet Marina & Shipyard Inc.
See Shipco 2295, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 825 F.2d 925, 928 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dale L. McCullough Trustee in Bankruptcy for Brio Petroleum, Inc. v. Billy G. Young and Loretta M. Young
See In re General Coffee Co., 64 B.R. 702 , 709 n. 13 (S.D.Fla.1986), aff'd, 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 (1988). 4 Our review of the record leads us to agree with the bankruptcy court's finding.
cited
Cited "see"
Nordberg v. Arab Banking Corp. (In Re Chase & Sanborn Corp.)
See City National Bank v. General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); *913 77 Northwestern U.L.Rev., supra, at 218-19.
discussed
Cited "see"
Diamond Mortgage Corporation Of Illinois v. Peter Sugar
(2×)
See Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.1987) (federal court in federal question case implements national, not state, policy), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); Fitzsimmons v. Barton, 589 F.2d 330, 333 (7th Cir.1979) ("Here the sovereign is the United States, and there can be no question but that the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, has sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of the exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court."); see also In re Rusco Indus., Inc., 104 B.R.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bridge v. Invest America, Inc.
See Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.1987) (reaffirming the principle that nationwide service of process is constitutionally permissible in federal question cases in federal courts where the defendant has contacts with the United States), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Illinois v. Sugar
(2×)
See Li-sak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.1987) (federal court in federal question case implements national, not state, policy), cert, denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); Fitzsimmons v. Barton, 589 F.2d 330, 333 (7th Cir.1979) (“Here the sovereign is the United States, and there can be no question but that the defendant, a resident citizen of the United States, has sufficient contacts with the United States to support the fairness of the exercise of jurisdiction over him by a United States court.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kon Yu-Leung
See United States v. Crespo, 834 F.2d 267, 271 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1471 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kon Yu-Leung
See United States v. Crespo, 834 F.2d 267, 271 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1471 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veatch v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital
See Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing, 827 F.2d 13 , 18 n. 7 (7th Cir.1987), overruled on other grounds, Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 860 F.2d 834, 836 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1471 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Oak Industries, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.
See Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., 833 F.2d 1575, 1577 , 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1935, 1937 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 701 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Landmen Partners, Inc. v. The Blackstone Group, L.P.
See, e.g., Kapps v. Torch Offshore, Inc., 379 F.3d 207 , 18 213, 215 (5th Cir. 2004) (holding that the “definition of ‘material’ under Section 11 is not strictly 19 limited to information that is firm-specific and non-public” and noting that “the SEC requires an 20 issuer to disclose certain ‘trends’ that could affect its business, and in appropriate circumstances this 21 requirement may extend to certain trends that are not firm-specific or are publicly available”); 21 1 United Paperworkers, 985 F.2d at 1199 (stating that “the mere presence in the media of sporadic 2 news re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Litwin v. Blackstone Group, L.P.
See, e.g., Kapps v. Torch Offshore, Inc., 379 F.3d 207, 213, 215 (5th Cir.2004) (holding that the “definition of ‘material’ under Section 11 is not strictly limited to information that is firm-specific and non-public” and noting that “the SEC requires an issuer to disclose certain ‘trends’ that could affect its business, and in appropriate circumstances this requirement may extend to certain trends that are not firm-specific or are publicly available”); United Paperworkers, 985 F.2d at 1199 (stating that “the mere presence in the media of sporadic news reports ... should not …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate Partners, Ltd. v. Leckey (In Re W/B Associates)
See also Grubbs v. Dembec, 274 Pa.Super. 362 , 418 A.2d 447, 451, n. 1 (1980)(“Although a constructive trust may not be judicially decreed until many years subsequent to the transaction giving rise to the trust, the accepted theory is that the constructive trust is in existence at the inception of the transaction.... and the beneficiary is possessed with an equitable interest in the trust property prior to the declaration of the constructive trust.”) See also In re General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699, 702-703 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gatz v. Ponsoldt
See, e.g., Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 672 (7th Cir.1987) (proper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b) also makes venue proper under 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (b) when interests of justice require) (dicta to guide district court’s reconsideration of venue issue on remand), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); APS, LLC v. Facility Pharmacy Corp., 2000 WL 33976531 , at *2-3 (W.D.Ky.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dale v. Frankel
Butcher’s Union Local No. 498, United Food and Commercial Workers v. SDC Inv., Inc., 788 F.2d 535 (9th Cir.1986); see also Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 672 (7th Cir.1987) (section 1965(b) authorizes nationwide service of process so at least one court will have jurisdiction over everyone connected with any RICO enterprise), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
CRS Steam, Inc. v. Engineering Resources, Inc. (In Re CRS Steam, Inc.)
See, e.g., City Nat’l Bank v. General Coffee Corp. (In re General Coffee Corp.), 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); N.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic Of Panama v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
In re Chase & Sanborn Corp., 835 F.2d 1341 , 1344 (11th Cir.1988), rev'd on other grounds sub. nom, Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33 , 109 S.Ct. 2782 , 106 L.Ed.2d 26 (1989); see also Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.1987) (noting that section 1965 "creates personal jurisdiction by authorizing service"), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.
In re Chase & Sanborn Corp., 835 F.2d 1341, 1344 (11th Cir.1988), rev’d on other grounds sub. nom, Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33 , 109 S.Ct. 2782 , 106 L.Ed.2d 26 (1989); see also Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671 (7th Cir.1987) (noting that section 1965 “creates personal jurisdiction by authorizing service”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lifeway Foods, Inc. v. Fresh Made, Inc.
In federal question eases, Fifth Amendment due process is satisfied where the defendant has “sufficient contacts with the United States as a whole rather than any particular state or other geographic area.” Martinez De Ortiz, 910 F.2d at 381 ; see also Lisak v. Mercantile Ban- *1319 corp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671-72 (7th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); Fitzsimmons v. Barton, 589 F.2d 330, 332-35 (7th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AlliedSignal Inc. v. Blue Cross of California
“The Supreme Court never has ruled on the issue, but all of the courts of appeals that have addressed the question have applied a national contacts standard when process is served under an applicable federal service provision.” Id. (footnote omitted); see, e.g., Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., 834 F.2d 668, 671-72 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1472 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 314-15 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Driver v. Helms, 577 F.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Delgado v. Walker
See also United States v. Crespo, 834 F.2d 267, 271 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1471 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); United States v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 22, 26 (2d Cir.1978). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Reliance Equities, Inc.
"The purpose of [section 544] is ... to preserve the assets of the estate against unfiled, unrecorded, or secret liens." In re Teerlink Ranch Ltd., 886 F.2d 1233, 1235-36 (9th Cir.1989); see also In re General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699, 701 (11th Cir.1987) ("Congress has resolved through § 544 that the debtor's creditors must at all costs be protected from secret liens.") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988). 35 Section 546(b) protects creditors by imposing a notice requirement in certain situations in which bankruptcy intervenes before the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In re Reliance Equities, Inc.)
“The purpose of [section 544] is ... to preserve the assets of the estate against unfiled, unrecorded, or secret liens.” In re Teerlink Ranch Ltd., 886 F.2d 1233, 1235-36 (9th Cir.1989); see also In re General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699, 701 (11th Cir.1987) (“Congress has resolved through § 544 that the debtor’s creditors must at all costs be protected from secret liens.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pitera
See id. at-, 111 S.Ct. at 2706 (Kennedy, J., concurring) (citing to studies linking drug trafficking to crimes of violence); see also United States v. Crespo, 834 F.2d 267, 271 (2d Cir.1987) (recognizing firearms as tools of the drug trade), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1471 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Leedy Mortg. Co., Inc.
See, e.g., In re General Coffee Corp., 828 F.2d 699, 701-04 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 699 (1988); In re Summit Airlines, Inc., 94 B.R. 367, 370-72 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1988), aff 'd, 102 B.R. 32 (E.D.Pa.1989); In re American Int’l Airways, Inc., 70 B.R. 102, 104-06 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987) (hereinafter cited as “AIA ”); and Atlantic Mortgage, suyra, 69 B.R. at 325-31 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. Kraftsow
See, e.g., Kronfeld v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 832 F.2d 726, 731 (2d Cir.1987) (§ 11 action), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); Alton Box Board Co. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 560 F.2d 916, 919-20 (8th Cir.1977) (§ 12(2) action); Akerman v. Oryx Communications, Inc., 609 F.Supp. 363, 367 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (both § 11 and § 12(2) actions), affirmed and remanded on other grounds, 810 F.2d 336 (2d Cir.1987). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
See, e.g., Kronfeld v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 832 F.2d 726, 736 (2d Cir.1987) (“when TWC announced ... that it was ‘considering the possible separation of TWA,’ the price of TWA’s common stock went into an immediate and sharp decline”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1470 , 99 L.Ed.2d 700 (1988); cf. Detwiler v. Offenbecher, No. 86 Civ. 7150 (RWS), slip op. at 86, 1989 WL 107939 (S.D.N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
King
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-1362.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.