green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Myers v. Celotex Corp.
an expert's opinion need not be generally accepted in the scientific community before it can be sufficiently reliable and probative to support a jury finding.
discussed
Cited "see"
Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.
Accord Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc) (noting that section 112 ¶ 6 "rules out the possibility that any and every means which performs the function specified in the claim literally satisfies that limitation”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc.
Co., 736 F.2d 1529, 1535 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 545 , 83 L.Ed.2d 432 (1984); accord Osburn v. Anchor Lab., Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 915-16 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988); and Cella v. United States, 998 F.2d 418, 425 (7th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.
(2×)
Vance v. Campbell, 66 U.S. (1 Black) 427, 429-30 , 17 L.Ed. 168 (1861); Schumacher v. Cornell, 96 U.S. 549, 554 , 24 L.Ed. 676 (1877); accord Pennwalt v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931 , 4 USPQ2d 1737 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc ), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Health Benefit Management Cost Containment, Inc.
See Osburn v. Anchor Labs., Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 911 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Katz v. AIWA America, Inc.
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988) and 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 935 , 4 USPQ2d 1737, 1739-40 (Fed.Cir.1987) (in banc), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988); Per-kin-Elmer Corp. v. Westinghouse Elec., 822 F.2d 1528, 1533 , 3 USPQ2d 1321, 1325 (Fed.Cir.1987); Lemelson v. United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 , 224 USPQ 526, 533 (Fed.Cir. 1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Kosmacek v. Farm Service Co-Op of Persia
See Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 915 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.
See Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 915-16 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corporation
See Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 915-16 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judin v. United States
Becton, 922 F.2d at 798 n. 3 (quoting Union Water Meter Co. v. Desper, 101 U.S. 332, 337 , 25 L.Ed. 1024 (1880)); see also Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 949-54 (Fed.Cir.1987) (Nies, J., concurring), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 961 , 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 , and cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1474 , 99 L.Ed.2d 703 (1988). [A] court may not, under the guise of applying the doctrine of equivalents, erase a plethora of meaningful structural and functional limitations of the claim on which the public is entitled to rely in avoiding infringement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corporation
We ask whether in reaching his conclusion, the witness used a well-founded methodology or mode of reasoning, one "sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs." Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ; see also Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.
We ask whether in reaching his conclusion, the witness used a well-founded methodology or mode of reasoning, one “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ; see also Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kellogg Co. v. Mattox
See also Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d 908, 911-13 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1476 , 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988). 15.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neece
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-1511.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.