green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…the court must search for a reasonable way to read the verdicts as expressing a coherent view of the case
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation
(2×)
the court must search for a reasonable way to read the verdicts as expressing a coherent view of the case
discussed
Cited "see"
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg
(2×)
See Standard Chartered PLC, 190 Ariz. at 39 , 945 P.2d at 350 (as corrected on denial of reconsideration) (quoting Toner v. Lederle Lab., 828 F.2d 510, 512 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see"
Stroud v. Cook
Fed.R.Evid. 801; see United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarence Kayes Gene Kennedy Sharon Kennedy Wiley Lacy John R. Maurer Lester Reynolds Shirley Reynolds Hollis Rollins Donald Filby Jack Miller James Lovell Paul S. Brady Wilfred A. Blain Lloyd S. Tucker Donald J. Schoenhofer v. Pacific Lumber Company Maxxam Group, Inc. Maxxam, Inc. Charles Hurwitz Paul N. Schwartz James Iaco William Leone, Clarence Kayes Gene Kennedy Sharon Kennedy Wiley Lacy John R. Maurer Lester Reynolds Shirley Reynolds Hollis Rollins Donald Filby Jack Miller James Lovell Paul S. Brady Wilfred A. Blain Lloyd S. Tucker v. Pacific Lumber Company Maxxam Group, Inc. Maxxam, Inc. Charles Hurwitz Paul N. Schwartz James Iaco William Leone
See General Motors Corp. v. California Bd. of Equalization, 815 F.2d 1305 , 1309 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 941 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 24 The McCarran-Ferguson Act, by its own terms, does not preclude a construction of a federal statute that would affect state law if the congressional act "specifically relates to the business of insurance." 15 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kayes v. Pacific Lumber Co.
See General Motors Corp. v. California Bd. of Equalization, 815 F.2d 1805 , 1309 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 941 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
(2×)
See Toner v. Lederle Labs., 828 F.2d 510 , 512 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Cup, Inc. v. Jenkins Coffee Service, Inc.
(2×)
See Toner v. Lederle Labs., 828 F.2d 510 , 513 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480, 1488-89 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Cup, Inc. v. Jenkins Coffee Service, Inc.
(2×)
See Toner v. Lederle Labs., 828 F.2d 510 , 513 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480, 1488-89 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grosvenor Properties Ltd. v. Southmark Corp.
(2×)
See Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, 828 F.2d 510, 512 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grosvenor Properties Ltd., a California Corporation Grosvenor Ventures Ltd. L.P v. Hotels Ltd. v. Southmark Corporation Southmark Vancouver Corporation, Grosvenor Properties Ltd., a California Corporation Grosvenor Ventures Ltd. L.P v. Hotels Ltd. v. Southmark Corporation, and William S. Friedman
(2×)
See Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, 828 F.2d 510, 512 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 , 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating & Piping Industry v. Franchise Tax Board
See General Motors v. California Board of Equalization, 815 F.2d 1305 , 1308 (9th Cir.1987), reh’g denied, 824 F.2d 816 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medema v. Medema Builders
We agree with every court of appeals to decide this question that "the district court has no discretion to stay proceedings as to claims within exclusive federal jurisdiction under the wise judicial administration exception." Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 436 (9th Cir.1983); see also General Motors Corp. v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 815 F.2d 1305 , 1309 (9th Cir.1987) (Kennedy, J.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); Andrea Theatres, 787 F.2d at 62 ; Comment, Federal Court Stays and Dismissals in Deference to Parallel State Court Proceed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medema v. Medema Builders, Inc.
We agree with every court of appeals to decide this question that “the district court has no discretion to stay proceedings as to claims within exclusive federal jurisdiction under the wise judicial administration exception.” Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 436 (9th Cir.1983); see also General Motors Corp. v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 815 F.2d 1305 , 1309 (9th Cir.1987) (Kennedy, J.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1122 , 99 L.Ed.2d 282 (1988); Andrea Theatres, 787 F.2d at 62 ; Comment, Federal Court Stays and Dismissals in Deference to Parallel State Court Procee…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lederle Laboratories, a Division of American Cyanamid Co.
v.
Toner
v.
Toner
No. 87-1151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1988.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.