green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“proof of the use of the mails may be direct or circumstantial.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Stephen Clay Perry and Steve's Discount Drugs
proof of the use of the mails may be direct or circumstantial.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Masi
Inasmuch as defendant never requested an attorney and the right to counsel had not indelibly attached, there was “no legal requirement that an attorney be present before [he] change [d] an earlier decision to remain silent and talkfed] to the authorities” (People v Davis, 75 NY2d 517, 522-523 [1990]; see People v Reid, 136 AD2d 578, 578 [1988], lv denied 70 NY2d 1010 [1988], cert denied 486 US 1035 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louise H. Marshall, John M. Gliottoni, Jr. And Charles Panici
See United States v. Holzer, 840 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.) (observing that perhaps in every case of extortion under color of right the extortionist might also be considered a bribe-taker), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard T. Marchese, Laura Lee Sorenson, Orville Leroy Sandberg, David R. Nemelka
See United States v. Holzer, 840 F.2d 1343, 1348 (7th Cir.) (where a judge accepted bribes, citizens were deprived only of the intangible right to fair administration of justice because there was no evidence that the citizens lost any money or property), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Medvecky, Jr.
See United States v. Chase, 838 F.2d 743, 751 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 (1988). 30 While some of Medvecky's co-defendants received substantially lower sentences than he did, he has not presented any evidence that the trial court penalized him for going to trial other than the disparity in sentences.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. United States
See United States v. Garner, 837 F. 2d 1404, 1423 (CA7 1987), cert. denied, 486 U. S. 1035 (1988); United States v. Spitler, 800 F. 2d 1267, 1274-1275 (CA4 1986); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F. 2d 578, 594-596 (CA3) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U. S. 1106 (1982); United States v. French, 628 F. 2d 1069, 1074 (CA8), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 956 (1980); United States v. Williams, 621 F. 2d 123, 123-124 (CA5 1980), cert. denied, 450 U. S. 919 (1981); United States v. Butler, 618 F. 2d 411, 417-420 (CA6), cert. denied, 447 U. S. 927 (1980); United States v. Hall, 536 F. 2d 313, 320-321 (CA10), c…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel P. Glecier
See United States v. Garner, 837 F.2d 1404, 1420-21 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doe
See United States v. Chase, 838 F.2d 743, 750 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 609 (1988) (reference to "Columbians"); United States v. Hernandez, supra note 63, 865 F.2d at 927-928 (reference to "Cuban drug dealers”); United States v. Janis, 831 F.2d 773, 778 (8th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1073 , 108 S.Ct. 1046 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1988) (remarks concerning Indians); Fontanello v. United States, supra note 59, 19 F.2d at 922 (references to "Italian” bootleggers); United States v. Rodriguez, 765 F.2d 1546 , 1560 n. 19 (11th Cir.1985) (reference …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guzman-Rivera
United States v. Ogbuehi, 18 F.3d 807, 812 (9th Cir.1994); see also, United States v. Agyen, 842 F.2d 203, 205 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2021 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
See Zafiro v. United States, --- U.S. ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. 933, 939 , 122 L.Ed.2d 317 (1993) (noting that " 'juries are presumed to follow their instructions' ") (quoting Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 209 , 107 S.Ct. 1702, 1708 , 95 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987)). 5 Maxwell and Gregg moved for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government's case, but not at the close of their cases 6 "The term 'fronted' refers to a transfer of drugs in which one person transfers the drugs to a second person in return for the second person's promise to pay the sales price within a few days." United States v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
(2×)
This inference is supported by the testimony of McWilliams, who stated 6 "The term `fronted' refers to a transfer of drugs in which one person transfers the drugs to a second person in return for the second person's promise to pay the sales price within a few days." United States v. Alfaro, 919 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir. 1990); see also United States v. Chase, 838 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir.) (defining "fronted" to mean "delivered on consignment"), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S. Ct. 2022 , 100 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
However, Richard Townsen, who worked for Rogala, testified that on several occasions Gregg delivered multiple kilograms of cocaine to 6 "The term `fronted' refers to a transfer of drugs in which one person transfers the drugs to a second person in return for the second person's promise to pay the sales price within a few days." United States v. Alfaro, 919 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir. 1990); see also United States v. Chase, 838 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir.) (defining "fronted" to mean "delivered on consignment"), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S. Ct. 2022 , 100 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sandra Hernandez, A/K/A \Cha Cha
See also United States v. Garner, 837 F.2d 1404, 1413 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 (1988) (178-page indictment, 348 alleged illegal acts, six-week trial); Kopituk, 690 F.2d at 1320 (large and complex trial alone does not establish prejudice); United States v. Diez, 515 F.2d 892, 904 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1052 , 96 S.Ct. 780 , 46 L.Ed.2d 641 (1976) (“The complexity of a trial, by itself, is insufficient grounds for overturning a trial court’s denial of a severance motion.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis Rochester
See, e.g., United States v. Matt, 838 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1035 , 100 L.Ed.2d 607 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-6818.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.