Ashford v. Lynaugh, 488 U.S. 900 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Ashford v. Lynaugh, 488 U.S. 900 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
293 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 42 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Cedeno (ohioctapp, 2011-02-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Cedeno
Ohio Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Coleman (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 286 , 525 N.E.2d 792 , paragraph two of the syllabus, certiorari denied (1988), 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 250 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 . .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Edwards
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 605 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patterson (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 606 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Golphin
N.C. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 601 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 591-92 (holding the State did not rely on the codefendant’s testimony, but was able to show independent evidence of defendant’s guilt), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Tatum
E.D. Tex. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1140 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); see also United States v. Jaswal, 47 F.3d 539, 542 (2d Cir.1995).
cited Cited "see" Steven Wesley Parkus v. Michael Bowersox
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Parkus, 753 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988), and we summarize them here.
cited Cited "see" Steven Parkus v. Michael Bowersox
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Parkus, 753 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 (1988), and we summarize them here.
discussed Cited "see" Cummings v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rojem v. State, 1988 OK CR 57 , 753 P.2d 359, 363 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bishop
N.C. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 611 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 597 (where State’s witness testified about details of prior violent felony to prove the (e)(3) aggravating circumstance, defendant was able to bring out evidence which gave a “more favorable impression of defendant’s character” than would be present had only the armed robbery conviction been introduced), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see" Allen v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rojem v. State, 753 P.2d 359, 363 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988); Coleman v. State, 670 P.2d 596, 597 (Okl.Cr.1983); Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968).
cited Cited "see" Braun v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rojem v. State, 753 P.2d 359, 365 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988) (citing Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 , 82 S.Ct. 955 , 8 L.Ed.2d 98 (1962)).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hinchey (2×)
Ariz. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Stewart, 121 Ill.2d 93 , 117 Ill.Dec. 187, 197 , 520 N.E.2d 348, 358 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 246 , 102 L.Ed.2d 234 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. Walker
Tenn. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 753 S.W.2d 659, 671 (Tenn.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bacon (2×)
N.C. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594 , 365 S.E.2d 587 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
cited Cited "see" People v. Collins
Ill. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Emerson (1987), 122 Ill. 2d 411, 434-35 , 522 N.E.2d 1109 , cert, denied (1988), 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
cited Cited "see" Motley v. Collins
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Landry v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1117, 1120 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
cited Cited "see" Anderson v. Collins
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Landry v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1117, 1120 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Motley v. Collins (2×)
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Landry v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1117, 1120 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988). 25 Motley also argues that his trial counsel, instead of calling him to the stand, should have rested after the State put on its case in chief.
cited Cited "see" Workman v. State
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 753 S.W.2d 659 (Tenn.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" U.S. v. Rojas-Martinez
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1139 (5th Cir.) (distinguishing between permissible expressions of sympathy and impermissible promises of leniency), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Alberto Rojas-Martinez and Olavo Michel, Jr., United States of America v. Jose Carillo-Ruiz, Martin Casas-Acevedo, Efrain Gonzalez-Torres, Roberto Herrera, Miguel Herrera, and Alfredo Reyes-Marentes
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1139 (5th Cir.) (distinguishing between permissible expressions of sympathy and impermissible promises of leniency), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
cited Cited "see" U.S. v. Rojas-Martinez
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1139 (5th Cir.) (distinguishing between permissible expressions of sympathy and impermissible promises of leniency), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mildred Miller
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1141 (5th Cir.) ("state trial court and jury, given the primary task of deciding the facts, accepted the credibility" of the witnesses), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 (1988); Tapia, 926 F.2d 1554, 1563 (10th Cir.1991) ("both witnesses were thoroughly impeached.
cited Cited "see" State v. Faison
unknown court · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594 , 365 S.E.2d 587 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Feltrop (2×)
Mo. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mercer v. Armontrout, 844 F.2d 582 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Davis (2×)
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
The Government argues that no such lapse occurred here, and that Davis’s conduct is more analogous to cases in which North Carolina has “rejected ... ‘belated intent’ and ‘mixed-motive’ arguments.” Government’s Br. 14; see, e.g., State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 593 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988) (stating, “provided that the theft and the force are aspects of a single transaction, it is immaterial whether the intention to commit the theft was formed before or after force was used on the victims”); State v. Fields, 3…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Flaugher
N.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 605 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 (“[P]rovided that the theft and the force are aspects of a single transaction, it is immaterial whether the intention to commit the theft was formed before or after force was used upon the victims.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rankin
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, our Supreme Court has repeatedly held that “it is immaterial whether the intent was formed before or after force was used upon the victim, provided that the theft and force are aspects of a single transaction.” Faison, 330 N.C. at 359 , 411 S.E.2d at 150 ; see also State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 605 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edmund Zagorski v. State of Tennessee
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., State v. Barber, 753 S.W.2d 659, 668-69 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 70-71 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Walters v. Maschner
N.D. Iowa · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mercer v. Armontrout, 844 F.2d 582, 587 (8th Cir.) (noting that habeas relief is available only if the alleged error “fatally infected the trial” and deprived the petitioner of “the fundamental fairness which is the essence of due process”) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hamilton
N.C. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, there must be “some unusual facts present in both crimes or particularly similar acts which would indicate that the same person committed both crimes.” State v. Moore, 309 N.C. 102, 106 , 305 S.E.2d 542, 545 (1983); see also State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 603 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 593 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George B. Harris v. Michael Bowersox State of Missouri
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mercer v. Amiontrout, 844 F.2d 582, 587 (8th Cir.) (noting that habeas relief is available only if the alleged error “fatally infected the trial” and deprived the petitioner of “the fundamental fairness which is the essence of due process”) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George Harris v. Michael Bowersox
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mercer v. Armontrout, 844 F.2d 582, 587 (8th Cir.) (noting that habeas relief is available only if the alleged error "fatally infected the trial" and deprived the petitioner of "the fundamental fairness which is the essence of due process") (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Rojem v. State, 1988 OK CR 57 , 753 P.2d 359, 370 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 ; Brogie v. State, 1985 OK CR 2 , 695 P.2d 538, 544 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Rojem v. State, 753 P.2d 359, 370 (Okl.Cr.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988); Brogie v. State, 695 P.2d 538, 544 (Okl.Cr. 1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Yedinak (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People v. Williams, 44 Cal.3d 883 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 336 , 751 P.2d 395 (1988) (if sufficient foundation is laid, lay opinion testimony as to whether a person is under the influence of narcotics is admissible), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988); see also 21 ALR 4th 905 (collecting cases).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Scurlock
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Ballard, 586 F.2d 1060, 1063 (5th Cir.1978); see also, Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1139-41 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988). 11 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. People (2×)
Colo. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People v. Wade, 44 Cal.3d 975 , 244 Cal.Rptr. 905, 912 , 750 P.2d 794, 801 (Cal.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 248 , 102 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Elliott
Ohio Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, State v. Coleman (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 286, 291-292 , 525 N.E.2d 792, 798 , certiorari denied (1988), 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 250 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pugliese v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
A “promise” has been defined as “an offer to perform or withhold some future action within the control of the promisor.” United States v. Fraction, 795 F.2d 12, 15 (3d Cir. 1986); see also Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1139 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul Delo (2×)
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mercer v. Armontrout, 643 F.Supp. 1021, 1024 (W.D.Mo.1986) ("the absence of legislative or court-imposed standards to govern the jury in weighing aggravating circumstances does not render the sentencing statute invalid if applied in a constitutional fashion"), aff'd, 844 F.2d 582 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988). 34 On the facts of this case, the Missouri Supreme Court held: 35 There is no doubt that appellant's savage beating of Daisy Nash supported a finding of the first circumstance as did appellant's "infliction of * * * psychological…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Johnson
Cal. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
(People v. Gates (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1168, 1181-1182 [ 240 Cal.Rptr. 666 , 743 P.2d 301 ]; see also People v. Hendricks (1988) 44 Cal.3d 635, 642 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 181 , 749 P.2d 836 ], cert. den. 488 U.S. 900 [ 102 L.Ed.2d 236 , 109 S.Ct. 247 ].) In the latter case, felonious intent is not negated.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roper
N.C. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 610-12 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 597 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doyle J. Williams v. Bill Armontrout (2×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mercer v. Armontrout, 844 F.2d 582, 586-87 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 249 , 102 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988); Manning-El v. Wyrick, 738 F.2d 321, 323 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 919 , 105 S.Ct. 298 , 83 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); Britton v. Rogers, 631 F.2d 572, 575 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 939 , 101 S.Ct. 2021 , 68 L.Ed.2d 327 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Michael Don Micheaux v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (2×)
5th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132, 1137 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ashford
v.
Illinois Stewart v. Illinois Emerson v. Illinois Orange v. Illinois Green v. North Carolina Hendricks v. California Hawkins v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections Landry v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections Barber v. Tennessee Parkus v. Missouri Wade v. California Williams v. California Rojem v. Oklahoma Mercer v. Armontrout, Warden Coleman v. Ohio
No. 87-7118; No. 87-7119; No. 87-7136; No. 87-7137; No. 87-7174; No. 88-5074; No. 88-5131; No. 88-5198; No. 88-5300; No. 88-5310; No. 88-5314; No. 88-5330; No. 88-5383; No. 88-5393; No. 88-5440.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1988.
488 U.S. 900
Brennan, Marshall.
Published

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. 111.; Sup. Ct. Ill,; Sup. Ct. 111.; Sup. Ct. Ill; Sup. Ct. N. C.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 5th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; C. A. 8th Cir.; and Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.