green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“company is not required to engage in ‘educated guesses or predictions’ ”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
LL Capital Partners v. ROCKEFELLER CENTER PROPS.
company is not required to engage in 'educated guesses or predictions
discussed
Cited "see"
Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.
(2×)
See Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., 541 So. 2d 182 , 188 n.17 (La.) (Wixom “reflects] an anomalous and overly restrictive view of concurrent jurisdiction”), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S. Ct. 30 , 106 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
See Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252, 261 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 5.Ct. 29, 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) (“once the tender offer has been consummated it becomes difficult, and sometimes virtually impossible, for a court to ‘unscramble the eggs’”) (citations omitted); Petereit v. S.B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.
See Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A, 871 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.1989) (target corporation found to have standing to sue for Clayton Act violation), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S.Ct. 29 , 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v. Minorca, 5.A, 871 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S.Ct. 29 , 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holford USA Ltd., Inc. v. Cherokee, Inc.
See Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252, 256 (2d Cir.), amended, 890 F.2d 569 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S.Ct. 29 , 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) (hearing unnecessary when there are no essential facts in dispute, or when the parties are content to rest on the affidavits). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.
See, e.g., Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorca, S.A., 871 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S.Ct. 29 , 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) (finding standing where target of an acquisition would lose independence because of injury occurring in the market; relied on in holding that a competitor-plaintiff has standing to challenge a merger in a market into which the plaintiff sought to expand (see Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. May Dep’t Stores Co., 881 F.Supp. 860, 878 (W.D.N.Y.1994))); Cia.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Europe & Overseas Commodity Traders, S.A. v. Banque Paribas London
Compare Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.) (holding that ownership by American residents representing 2.5% of plaintiff's shareholders and 5.3 million shares with a market value of about $120 million constitutes a substantial effect in the United States), cert. dismissed, 492 U.S. 939 , 110 S.Ct. 29 , 106 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Britz
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 88-6078.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 30, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
489 U. S. 1044 and 490 U. S. 1042. Motion of petitioner for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.