green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kanter v. Healy
See Romagosa, 2006 WL 2085461 , at *3 (noting that, in a bankruptcy appeal, “findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the bankruptcy court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” (citing SouthTrust Bank of Ala., N.A. v. Thomas (In re Thomas), 883 F.2d 991 , 994 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1007 (1990))).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Barnes
See Southtrust Bank of Alabama v. Thomas (In re Thomas), 883 F.2d 991 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990); Sun Finance Co., Inc. v. Howard (In re Howard), 972 F.2d 639 (5th Cir.1992); Piedmont Trust Bank v. Linkous (In re Linkous), 990 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kanter v. Healy
However, the Bankruptcy Court expressly found the evidence presented at trial demonstrated that the litigation “would require time, effort, and expense that would likely exceed the amounts at issue.” (Doc. 3-1, p. 7); see Christo, 223 F.3d at 1336 (affirming the bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement and reasoning that, “[e]ven if the likelihood of [appellee] succeeding in his claim . . . was slight, the bankruptcy court correctly noted that defense of any litigation, even that which is frivolous, is both time-consuming and costly”); see also Romagosa, 2006 WL 2085461 , at *3 (n…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holloway v. Southeast Alabama Medical Center & Golden Peanut Co. (In Re Holloway)
See, e.g., Southtrust Bank of Alabama, N.A. v. Thomas (In re Thomas), 883 F.2d 991, 996 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Daniels (In Re Daniels)
See also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991 , 996 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Bisch v. United States (In Re Bisch)
(4×)
See also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991, 998 (11th Cir.1989), cert, denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990) (confirmation of plan cannot extinguish lien for which no proof of claim is filed); In re Work, 58 B.R. 868, 873 (Bankr.D.Or.1986) (holding that a real property tax lien was not extinguished by the county’s failure to file a proof of claim or by confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which treated the claim as unsecured).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitaker
v.
Bay Area Rapid Transit
v.
Bay Area Rapid Transit
No. 89-7340.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1990.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.