green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Albarran v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state’s witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1982) (No absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doster v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state’s witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1982) (No absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state’s witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983) (no absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses). “ ‘Several jurisdictions have similarly held.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dotch v. State
See Ex parte Davis, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (where Davis sought a psychological examination to prove the same two mitigating circumstances, the Alabama Supreme Court held that there was no evidence, including the pretrial mental examinations, indicating that Davis “was under the influence of a mental or emotional infirmity at the time he committed the capital felony that would be relevant to the mitigating circumstances in [Ala.] Code 1975, §§ 13-11-7(2) and (6)” or �…
discussed
Cited "see"
Billups v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state’s witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1982) (no absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses). “ ‘ “Several jurisdictions have similarly held.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state's witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1982) (No absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses). "`"Several jurisdictions have similarly held.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Locker, Unpublished Decision (5-13-2002)
See State v. Landrum (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 107 , certiorari denied (1991), 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1092 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state's witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1983) (no absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses). "`"Several jurisdictions have similarly held.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wyke, Unpublished Decision (9-21-1999)
See State v. Landrum (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 107 , 112 , certiorari denied, 498 U.S. 1127 (discussing need for continuance arising from newly-discovered evidence versus tactical decision by counsel).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Landrum, Unpublished Decision (1-11-1999)
See Landrum v. Ohio (1991), 498 U.S. 1127 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Burgess v. State
See Ex parte Davis, 554 So.2d 1111, 1112-13 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (citing Stanford v. Kentucky , the Alabama Supreme Court held that the death sentence for the 17-year-old defendant was not unconstitutional); Hart v. State, 612 So.2d 520, 535 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), aff'd, 612 So.2d 536 (Ala.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 953 , 113 S.Ct. 2450 , 124 L.Ed.2d 666 (1993) (citing Stanford v. Kentucky when reviewing the propriety of a death sentence, this court held that a death sentence imposed on the 16-year-old defendant was not unconstitutional…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Monroe
See People v. Thomas, 561 N.E.2d 57, 62-63 (Ill. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 (1991); cf. State v. Baillargeon, 124 N.H. 355, 361 , 470 A.2d 915, 919 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur v. State
See Slinker, supra. Cf., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), rehearing overruled, 569 So.2d 738 (Ala. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991) (defendant is not entitled to the general disclosure of the criminal records of the state's witnesses); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Cr.App.1983) (no absolute right to disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ryan
See, State v. Victor, 235 Neb. 770 , 457 N.W.2d 431 (1990), cert. denied 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S. Ct. 1091 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitman v. Ventetuolo
(2×)
Preiser, 411 U.S. at 500 ; see Young v. Kenny, 907 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1989) ("habeas must be the exclusive federal remedy not just when a state prisoner requests the invalidation or reduction of his sentence, but whenever the requested relief requires as its predicate a determination that a sentence being served is invalid or unconstitutionally long") (collecting cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 ; Offet v. Solem, 823 F.2d 1256, 1257 (8th Cir. 1987) (Sec. 1983 complaint for declaratory relief and damages indirectly attacks the length of confinement and directly implicates the policies o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitman v. Ventetuolo
(2×)
Preiser, 411 U.S. at 500 ; see Young v. Kenny, 907 F.2d 874 , _______ ___ _____ _____ 876 (9th Cir. 1989) ("habeas must be the exclusive federal -4- remedy not just when a state prisoner requests the ________ invalidation or reduction of his sentence, but whenever the requested relief requires as its predicate a determination that a sentence being served is invalid or unconstitutionally long") (collecting cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 ; Offet _____ ______ _____ v. Solem, 823 F.2d 1256, 1257 (8th Cir. 1987) ( 1983 _____ complaint for declaratory relief and damages indirectly attacks the l…
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Dietrick
See Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.App.1984), aff'd, Ex Parte Davis, 554 So.2d 1111 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); State v. Logan, 236 Kan. 79 , 689 P.2d 778 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. State
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 (Ala.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 [ (1980) ].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Stallworth
See, e.g., Davis v. State , 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State , 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App. 1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses); Mardis v. State , 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App. 1982); Mack v. State , 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App. 1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala. 1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGowan v. State
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App. 1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 [(1980)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte MacK
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 [(1980)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mack
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state’s witnesses);, Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 [(1980)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parris v. State
See, e.g., Davis v. State, 554 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd, 554 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1091 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1196 (1991); Wright v. State, 424 So.2d 684 (Ala.Crim.App.1982) (no absolute right of disclosure of criminal records of state's witnesses); Mardis v. State, 423 So.2d 331 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Mack v. State, 375 So.2d 476 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), aff'd, 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 903 , 100 S.Ct. 3044 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1134 (Ala.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeves v. Hopkins
See NELR 39.2(e); see also Williams v. Armontrout, 679 F.Supp. 916, 922 (W.D.Mo. 1988) (when brief and traverse prepared by petitioner’s counsel failed to provide any factual or legal argument in support of certain claims presented in the pro se petition, those claims were considered abandoned), aff'd, 912 F.2d 924 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1127 , 111 S.Ct. 1092 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1197 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Victor
v.
Nebraska Washington v. Arizona Davis v. Alabama Caldwell v. Tennessee Thomas v. Illinois Landrum v. Ohio Williams v. Armontrout, Warden
v.
Nebraska Washington v. Arizona Davis v. Alabama Caldwell v. Tennessee Thomas v. Illinois Landrum v. Ohio Williams v. Armontrout, Warden
No. 90-6259; No. 90-6578; No. 90-6639; No. 90-6640; No. 90-6682; No. 90-6711; No. 90-6739.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1991.
Marshall.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Neb.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio; and
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 90-6259, 235 Neb. 770, 457 N. W. 2d 431; No. 90-6578, 165 Ariz. 51, 796 P. 2d 853; No. 90-6639, 554 So. 2d 1111; No. 90-6682, 137 Ill. 2d 500, 561 N. E. 2d 57; No. 90-6711, 53 Ohio St. 3d 107, 559 N. E. 2d 710; No. 90-6739, 912 F. 2d 924.
Dissent
Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.