green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
11.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…assignees of the fdic also enjoy protection from claims or defenses based upon unrecorded side agreements
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…the phrase 'if it is in the interest of justice' relates to claims which are nonfrivolous and as such should be decided on the merits.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor
the reservation of the power to amend the terms of the program prevents the participating state agencies from invoking the fifth amendment takings bar against subsequent congressional action.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
DiManno v. Such
the phrase 'if it is in the interest of justice' relates to claims which are nonfrivolous and as such should be decided on the merits.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
DiManno v. Such
the phrase 'if it is in the interest of justice' relates to claims which are nonfrivolous and as such should be decided on the merits.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee
assignees of the fdic also enjoy protection from claims or defenses based upon unrecorded side agreements
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William BLEDSOE
assignees of the fdic also enjoy protection from claims or defenses based upon unrecorded side agreements
cited
Cited "see"
Hussey v. State Farm Lloyds Insurance
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 901 F.2d 404, 435 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams ex rel. Williams v. Greenlee
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 901 F.2d 404, 435 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Bucher v. Richardson Hospital Authority, 160 F.R.D. 88, 92 (N.D.Tex.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Office Outfitters, Inc. v. AB Dick Co., Inc.
However, Rule 9 should be read together with Rule 8, which requires only a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); see Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l, AFL—CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Francisco Lucas Rodriguez-Roman v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Howitt v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 897 F.2d 583, 584 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990) (finding no legal authority that would permit one circuit to review another circuit’s decision not to transfer a ease, but concluding that even if there were such authority, the case was sufficiently weak on the merits that transfer was not “in the interests of justice”).
discussed
Cited "see"
NAB Asset Venture II, L.P. v. Amorello
F.D.I.C. v. Bledsoe, 989 F.2d 805, 810-11 (5th Cir. 1993); see Bell & Murphy & Assocs., Inc v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750, 754 (5th Cir. 1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 895 (assignees of federal insurers are also entitled to immunity under D’Oench, Duhme doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see"
NAB Asset Venture II, L.P. v. Amorello
F.D.I.C v. Bledsoe, 989 F.2d 805, 810-11 (5th Cir. 1993); see Bell & Murphy & Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750, 754 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 (assignees of federal insurers are also entitled to immunity under D’Oench, Duhme doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sawyer
McNally v. United States, _______ _____________ 483 U.S. 350, 359 (1987); see United States v. Ochs, 842 F.2d ___ _____________ ____ 515, 521 (1st Cir. 1988) (noting Court's unexpected decision), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sawyer
McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 359 , 107 S.Ct. 2875, 2881 , 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987); see United States v. Ochs, 842 F.2d 515, 521 (1st Cir.1988) (noting Court’s unexpected decision), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 245 , 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Meadowbriar Home for Children, Inc. v. Gunn
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int'l, AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Jackson County
When ruling upon a motion to dismiss, the Court “must accept as true all material allegations in the complaint and must construe the complaint in [the light most favorable to] the plaintiff.” Reid, 578 F.2d at 637 ; see Bell & Murphy and Associates, Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A, 894 F.2d 750 , 752 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Jerry D. Lancaster, Jerry D. Lancaster and Jerry D. Lancaster & Associates, Inc. v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 454 Health & Welfare Fund
We "give[ ] the term fiduciary a liberal construction in keeping with the remedial purpose of ERISA." American Fed'n of Unions, 841 F.2d at 662 (citing Donovan, 747 F.2d at 309 ); see Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reich v. Lancaster
We “give[] the term fiduciary a liberal construction in keeping with the remedial purpose of ERISA.” American Fed’n of Unions, 841 F.2d at 662 (citing Donovan, 747 F.2d at 309 ); see Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
5636 Alpha Road v. NCNB Texas National Bank
See Bell & Murphy & Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.) (extending D’Oench, Duhme to NCNB, as a bridge bank), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Fair v. NCNB Tex. Nat’l Bank, 733 F.Supp. 1099, 1102-03 (N.D.Tex.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sealy Power, Ltd. v. Commissioner
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 423 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. v. First Nationwide Bank, 873 F.2d 859, 869 (5th Cir.1989), reh’g denied, 881 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1989) (en banc). 79 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Betancourt
See Bell & Murphy & Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.1990) (“it is irrelevant to the applicability of the D’Oench, Duhme rule whether [the borrower] ... was ‘coerced,’ [or] under ‘economic duress’ ”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); FDIC v. Gettysburg, Corp., 760 F.Supp. 115, 117 (S.D.Tex.1990) (“[t]he claim of economic duress is also barred”) (citing Langley, 484 U.S. 86 , 108 S.Ct. 396 ), aff'd, 952 F.2d 400 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 70 , 121 L.Ed.2d 36 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Asset Restructuring Fund, L.P. v. Aerial Lifts of New England, Inc.
Corp. v. Bledsoe, 989 F.2d 805, 810 (5th Cir. 1993); see Bell & Murphy & Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N. A., 894 F.2d 750 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 (1990) (assignees of federal insurers are also entitled to immunity under D’Oench Duhme doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herrera v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 410-11 (5th Cir.) (breach occurred during process of negotiating collective bargaining agreement), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); United Indep.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bodin Concrete Co.
See Bell & Murphy and Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A, 894 F.2d 750, 753 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Bell & Murphy & Assoc., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, 894 F.2d 750 , 753 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); see also Bowen, 915 F.2d at 1015 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmy W. Quick and Wanda J. Quick, Individually, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Cross-Appellants, Jimmy W. Quick and Wanda J. Quick, D/B/A Jimmy Quick Motors, a Partnership, Cross-Appellants v. Peoples Bank of Cullman County, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Crossclaim Plaintiff-Third Party Cross-Appellee, James Arthur Buckelew, Defendant-Crossclaim Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellee. Jimmy W. Quick, Individually Wanda J. Quick, Individually, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Jimmy W. Quick, a Partnership D/B/A Jimmy Quick Motors Wanda J. Quick, a Partnership D/B/A Jimmy Quick Motors v. Peoples Bank of Cullman County, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Crossclaim Plaintiff-Third-Party James Arthur Buckelew, Defendant-Crossclaim Defendant-Third-Party
Liquid Air Corp. v. Rogers, 834 F.2d 1297, 1306 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 917 , 109 S.Ct. 3241 , 106 L.Ed.2d 588 (1989); accord Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quick v. Peoples Bank
Liquid Air Corp. v. Rogers, 834 F.2d 1297, 1306 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 917 , 109 S.Ct. 3241 , 106 L.Ed.2d 588 (1989); accord Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int'l, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Castleglen, Inc., a California Corporation and Larry B. Harvey, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellants v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Commonwealth Federal Savings Association, and as Receiver of Commonwealth Savings Association Klein Financial Corporation, a California Corporation and Robert N. Klein, Ii, an Individual, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees, Santa Fe Apartments, Ltd., a Utah Limited Partnership Busch Management Co., a Utah Corporation and Western States Title Company, Defendants-Counterclaimants. Emerson Realty & Management v. Castleglen, Inc., a California Corporation, Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Commonwealth Federal Savings Association, and as Receiver of Commonwealth Savings Association, a Texas Savings and Loan Association Klein Financial Corporation, a California Corporation Robert N. Klein, Ii, an Individual Santa Fe Apartments, Ltd., a Utah Limited Partnership and Busch Management Company, a Utah Corporation
See Bell & Murphy v. Interfirst, 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); FDIC v. Newhart, 892 F.2d 47, 49-50 (8th Cir.1989) (FDIC's D'Oench protection extends to transferee).
discussed
Cited "see"
Castleglen, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See Bell & Murphy v. Interfirst, 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); FDIC v. Newhart, 892 F.2d 47, 49-50 (8th Cir.1989) (FDIC’s D’Oench protection extends to transferee).
cited
Cited "see"
Bromenn Healthcare v. Northwestern National Life Insurance
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l, 901 F.2d 404, 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990) and Brandt v. Grounds, 687 F.2d 895, 897 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. Moench
See Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Liquid Air Corp. v. Rogers, 834 F.2d 1297, 1307 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 917 , 109 S.Ct. 3241 , 106 L.Ed.2d 588 (1989); Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank, 815 F.2d 522 , 529 (9th Cir.1987); Schreiber Distrib.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Breese v. Maloney
Compare Commonwealth v. Bonds, 424 Mass. 698 , 677 N.E.2d 1131 (1997) (reasonable doubt instruction found defective) with Commonwealth v. Smith, 381 Mass. 141 , 407 N.E.2d 1291 (1980) (same reasonable doubt instruction in same trial as at issue in Bonds upheld); see also Smith v. Butler, 696 F.Supp. 748 (D.Mass.1988) (federal habeas corpus petition denied), aff'd, 879 F.2d 853 (1st Cir.), *114 cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 110 S.Ct. 245 , 107 L.Ed.2d 196 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Ross & Hardies
See, e.g., Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Yellow Bus Lines, 883 F.2d 132 ; Liquid Air Corp., 834 F.2d at 1306 ; Schofield v. First Commodity Corp., 793 F.2d 28, 30-32 (1st Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Josleyn
Yefsky, 994 F.2d at 890; see also United States v. Dray, ______ ___ ____ _____________ ____ 901 F.2d 1132, 1137 (1st Cir.) (noting that intent element in conspiracy differs from substantive mail fraud), cert. denied, _____ ______ 498 U.S. 895 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Josleyn
Yefsky, 994 F.2d at 890 ; see also United States v. Dray, 901 F.2d 1132, 1137 (1st Cir.) (noting that intent element in conspiracy differs from substantive mad fraud), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 245 , 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bazalo v. Brown
Data, 995 F.2d 383 (2nd Cir.1993); see also Howitt v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 897 F.2d 583, 584 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heden v. Hill
Burzynski, 989 F.2d at 741 (quoting Delta Truck & Tractor, Inc., 855 F.2d at 242 (emphasis in original)); Calcasieu Marine Nat’l Bank, 943 F.2d at 1461 ; see also Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int'l, 901 F.2d 404, 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Smith v. Cooper/T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
Thus, § 1823(e) and the D'Oench doctrine encourage "banks and their customers [to] include the entire extent of their obligations in the bank's records." Id.; see also Bell & Murphy & Assoc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.) ("The D'Oench, Duhme doctrine ... favors the interests of depositors and creditors of a failed bank, who cannot protect themselves from secret agreements, over the interests of borrowers, who can."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); In re NBW Commercial Paper Litigation, 826 F.Supp. 1448, 1461-62 (D.D.C.199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
Thus, § 1823(e) and the D’Oench doctrine encourage “banks and their customers [to] include the entire extent of their obligations in the bank’s records.” Id.; see also Bell & Murphy & Assoc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750 , 754 (5th Cir.) (“The D’Oench, Duhme doctrine ... favors the interests of depositors and creditors of a failed bank, who cannot protect themselves from secret agreements, over the interests of borrowers, who can.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); In re NEW Commercial Paper Litigation, 826 F.Supp. 1448, 1461…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonton v. Archer Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.
“Reduced to its three essentials, a civil RICO claim must involve: (1) a person who engages in (2) a pattern of racketeering activity; (3) connected to the acquisition, establishment, conduct, or control of an enterprise.” Calcasieu Marine Nat’l Bank, 943 F.2d at 1461 (quoting Delta Truck & Tractor, Inc., 855 F.2d at 242 (emphasis in original)); see also Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l, 901 F.2d 404, 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Smith v. Cooper/T.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Poole v. Baker
See also Howitt v. Department of Commerce, 897 F.2d 583, 584 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Halkias, John Halkias and Barry Jackson v. General Dynamics Corporation, John Anthony Cureington v. General Dynamics Corporation, Alvin Staudt, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Glastron, Inc.
See, e.g., Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 901 F.2d 404, 410-14 (5th Cir.) (applying period to claim for breach of duty of fair representation under Railway Labor Act), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Trial v. Atchison, T. & S.F.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 901 F.2d 404, 410-14 (5th Cir.) (applying period to claim for breach of duty of fair representation under Railway Labor Act), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 (1990); Trial v. Atchison, T. & S.F.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinowitz v. Gibraltar Savings
See also, Bell & Murphy v. Interfirst, 894 F.2d 750 , 753 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990) (D’Oench *957 bars claim even though lawsuit- was filed against financial institution before it was declared insolvent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinowitz v. Gibraltar Sav.
See also, Bell & Murphy v. Interfirst, 894 F.2d 750 , 753 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990) (D'Oench bars claim even though lawsuit was filed against financial institution before it was declared insolvent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duane Dendinger, Saeed Ahmed v. First National Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First National Bank
See also Bell & Murphy and Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750 , 753-54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Beighley v. FDIC, 868 F.2d 776, 784 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crowe v. Smith
See, e.g., Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 425 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 ; Bishop v. Corbitt Marine Ways, Inc., 802 F.2d 122, 122-23 (5th Cir.1986) (cataloging the circuits addressing this issue); but see United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1170 , 103 S.Ct. 815 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dendinger v. First Nat. Corp.
See also Bell & Murphy and Assocs., Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Gateway, N.A., 894 F.2d 750 , 753- 54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990); Beighley v. FDIC, 868 F.2d 776, 784 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
In reviewing such claims, “The trial judge’s decision to curtail discovery is granted great deference and, thus, is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.” Wichita Falls Office Assoc. v. Banc One Corp., 978 F.2d 915, 918 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2340 , 124 L.Ed.2d 251 (1993); see also Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int’l, 901 F.2d 404, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
In reviewing such claims, "The trial judge's decision to curtail discovery is granted great deference and, thus, is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard." Wichita Falls Office Assoc. v. Banc One Corp., 978 F.2d 915, 918 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2340 , 124 L.Ed.2d 251 (1993); see also Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l, 901 F.2d 404, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 895 , 111 S.Ct. 244 , 112 L.Ed.2d 203 (1990). 13 As to the Cotton Meade project, these claims were not disposed of in summary judgment, but were rather transferred to another court ba…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union v. United Magazine Co.
In addressing the applicability of federal statutes of limitations in labor disputes, the Second Circuit stated that it “borrow[s] state limitations periods where ... claims ‘are asserted ... against the union and concern disruption of internal union democracy’ ” (Phelan, supra, 973 F.2d at p. 1060 [quoting Rodonich v. House Wreckers Union Local 95, 817 F.2d 967 , 976 (1987)]) and that it “borrow[s] ... [the NLRA six month] limitations period where claims ... [implicate] the collective bargaining relationship, even in the non-hybrid context” (Id.; see also Landry v. Air Line Pilots…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maryland Higher Education Loan Corporation
v.
Cavazos, Secretary of Education South Carolina State Education Assistance Authority v. Cavazos, Secretary of Education and North Carolina v. United States
v.
Cavazos, Secretary of Education South Carolina State Education Assistance Authority v. Cavazos, Secretary of Education and North Carolina v. United States
No. 89-1873; No. 89-2027; No. 90-4.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
498 U.S. 895
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below. 897 F. 2d 1272.