green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Congress chose not to impose vesting requirements on welfare benefit plans____”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
McFarlin v. District of Columbia
But see also Young v. New York City Transit Auth., 903 F.2d 146 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) 8 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Inc.
given the demands now being made on the time of most district courts, it seems to me that a full-scale trial in a case as lopsided as this one would probably be a misallocation of judicial resources
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Craft v. Northbrook Life Insurance
congress chose not to impose vesting requirements on welfare benefit plans____
discussed
Cited "see"
E.E.O.C. v. Spitzer Management, Inc.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) (outlining previous standard for prima facie Title VII retaliatory harassment case).
cited
Cited "see"
Willis v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Serv.
cited
Cited "see"
Swanson v. Senior Resource Connection
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Harrison-Pepper v. Miami University
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Judy G. Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court John W. Black, County Judge/executive Brent Likins
(2×)
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990) (outlining previous standard for prima facie Title VII retaliatory harassment case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morris v. Oldham Cnty Fiscal
See Wu v. Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990) (outlining previous Thomas, 996 F.2d 271 , 274 (11th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 standard for prima facie Title VII retaliatory harassment U.S. 1033 (1994) (“a reasonable employer could not have case).
cited
Cited "see"
Shapira v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
James R. Penny v. United Parcel Service
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Latosky v. Morrison-Knudsen Corp.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990). 17 Plaintiff contends that MK-Ferguson unlawfully retaliated against him for writing the March 4, 1992, letter to his supervisor by stripping him of titles and authority, removing him from long-term jobs and ultimately terminating him.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard C. Clement v. Michigan Department of Transportation
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990). 7 Accordingly, we hereby deny Clement's request for oral argument and affirm the district court's judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
Walter L. Carter v. Nkc of America, Inc.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jesse K. Summers v. Samsonite Corporation
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ella N. Liggins v. Ohio Department of Development Donald Jakeway, Director Roberta Garber, Deputy Director Sarah Ward, Office Chief
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990); Wrenn v. Gould, 808 F.2d 493, 500 (6th Cir. 1987). 10 Fourth, because Liggins failed to offer evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact regarding elements of her discrimination case under Title VII, the district court properly found that Liggins failed to produce evidence sufficient to preclude summary judgment under Secs. 1981 and 1983.
cited
Cited "see"
Nancy Mudd v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert J. Greer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Cyrus A. Napper v. Secretary of the Air Force, Sheila D. Widnall
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Siskind v. Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys
See Adams v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Siskind v. The Sperry Retirement Program
See Adams v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis J. Grippi v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990); Wrenn v. Gould, 808 F.2d 493, 500-01 (6th Cir.1987). 6 Accordingly, we deny the request for oral argument and affirm the district court's judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Newman J. Finley v. Baker Material Handling Corporation
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.) (per curiam) (following McDonnell Douglas and Texas Dep't of Comm. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981), in retaliatory discharge context), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armbruster v. KH CORPORATION
See also, Sutter v. BASF Corp., 964 F.2d 556, 562 (1992) (quoting Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 947 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990)); Sengpiel v. B.F.Goodrich Co., 156 F.3d 660, 665 (6th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 526 U.S. 1016 , 119 S.Ct. 1249 , 143 L.Ed.2d 347 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joyce Workman, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Frito-Lay, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison v. Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County
A prima facie retaliation claim is established by showing the following: "(1) that plaintiff engaged in an activity protected by Title VII; (2) that the exercise of his civil rights was known by the defendant; (3) that, thereafter, the defendant took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and (4) that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action." Wrenn, 808 F.2d at 500 ; see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); compare Yates v. Av…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Tennessee
A prima facie retaliation claim is established by showing the following: “(1) that plaintiff engaged in an activity protected by Title VII; (2) that the exercise of his civil rights was known by the defendant; (3) that, thereafter, the defendant took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and (4) that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action.” Wrenn, 808 F.2d at 500 ; see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); compare Yates v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brayley v. Doehler-Jarvis Castings Division of NL Industries, Inc.
Notwithstanding the Fort Halifax exception, subsequent to that case the Supreme Court noted that "plans to pay employees severance benefits, which are payable only upon termination of employment, are employee welfare benefit plans within the meaning of [ERISA]” (Massachusetts v Morash, 490 US 107, 116 ; see also, Adams v Avondale Indus., 905 F2d 943, 947, cert denied 498 US 984 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newsom v. Textron Aerostructures
April 8, 1993); see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) (holding that a plaintiff must prove these same four elements to establish a retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII). 12 Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie ease of retaliation, the burden of production shifts to the defendant to “articulate some legitimate, non discriminatory reason ...” for discharging the plaintiff.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles F. Aldridge v. Mosler, Inc.
See, e.g., Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 947 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 (1990). 7 After careful study of the record and the briefs filed in this action, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court correctly entered judgment in the defendant's favor and AFFIRM. * The Hon.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krishan v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See, e.g., Adams v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990); Biggers, 4 F.3d at 295-96 ; Murphy, 850 F.Supp. at 1379-82.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Giuliani
Eng, 849 F.2d at 82 ; see also Young v. New York City Transit Authority, 729 F.Supp. 341, 348 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 903 F.2d 146 (2d Cir), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuper v. Quantum Chemicals Corp.
See, e.g., Adams v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 947 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990); Bryant v. International Fruit Product Co., 886 F.2d 132, 134 (6th Cir.1989); Rinard v. Eastern Co., 769 F.Supp. 1416, 1427 (S.D.Ohio 1991) (Graham, J.), rev’d on other grounds, 978 F.2d 265 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1843 , 123 L.Ed.2d 468 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Young
v.
New York City Transit Authority
v.
New York City Transit Authority
No. 90-591.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Mississippi (1) · Appellate Division of the Supr… (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.