Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc., 498 U.S. 964 (1990). · Go Syfert
Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc., 498 U.S. 964 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
454 citation events (89 in the last 25 years) across 55 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Cited for
At page 425 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991).published
    TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: 1 On November 13, 1990, the Supreme Court entered a judgment, 111 S.Ct. 425 (1990), vacating our opinion and judgment entered February 7, 1990, reported at 896 F.2d 1394 , on the ground that "the Court of Appeals sh…
  • Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991).published
    TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: On November 13, 1990, the Supreme Court entered a judgment, 111 S.Ct. 425 (1990), vacating our opinion and judgment entered February 7, 1990, reported at 896 F.2d 1394 , on the ground that “the Court of Appeals shou…
q1 “the court of appeals should address the jurisdictional issue in the first instance. ...”1 citing case1 citing court quotes it
  • Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991).published
    TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: On November 13, 1990, the Supreme Court entered a judgment, 111 S.Ct. 425 (1990), vacating our opinion and judgment entered February 7, 1990, reported at 896 F.2d 1394 , on the ground that “the Court of Appeals shou…
Other citing cases31 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 21 more citing cases
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INSURANCE COMPANY OF the STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
BEN COOPER, INC.
No. 89-1784.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1990.
Published opinion
498 U.S. 964
1990 U.S. LEXIS 5830

Case below, 896 F.2d 1394.

The United States, whose motion to intervene filed in this Court on September 28, 1990 was granted, has raised a question concerning the Court of Appeals’ jurisdiction over this case and hence a question about our own jurisdiction. Motion of the United States to Intervene and Brief of the United States, pages 9 through 17. Because the Court of Appeals should address the jurisdictional issue in the first instance, we vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and remand the case for consideration of the jurisdictional issue raised by the United States.