green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.
See Douglas v. Owens, 50 F.3d 1226, 1236 (3d Cir.1995) (stating that an issue has not been tried by implied consent if evidence relevant to the new claim is also relevant to the claim originally pled, because the defendant does not have any notice that the implied claim was being tried) (citing Gamma-10 Plastics v. American President Lines, Ltd., 32 F.3d 1244, 1256 (8th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995)); see also Portis v. First Nat’l Bank of New Albany, Miss., 34 F.3d 325, 332 (5th Cir.1994) (if evidence of a pleaded issue and an unpleaded iss…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Golphin
See State v. Keel, 337 N.C. 469, 493-94 , 447 S.E.2d 748, 761-62 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 131 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Waddell
See State v. Keel, 337 N.C. 469, 485 , 447 S.E.2d 748, 757 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gore
“If all three conditions are met, an appellate court may then exercise its discretion to notice a forfeited error, but only if (4) the error ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.’ ” Id. (quoting Olano, 507 U.S. at 732 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 ) (internal quotations marks and citations omitted); see United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 42 (2d Cir.1994) (adopting the Olano limitations), cer t. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gore
"If all three conditions are met, an appellate court may then exercise its discretion to notice a forfeited error, but only if (4) the error 'seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.' " Id. (quoting Olano, 507 U.S. at 732 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 ) (internal quotations marks and citations omitted); see United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 42 (2d Cir.1994) (adopting the Olano limitations), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 41 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 41 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995). 131 The failure of the district court to give an instruction that comports with the Reves standard, however, is not a basis for automatic reversal.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jaynes
See, e.g., State v. Keel, 337 N.C. 469, 495-97 , 447 S.E.2d 748, 762-63 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.
“In the Federal Courts of this District, the pleading of a punitive damage claim, under causes of action premised upon the Laws of the State of Minnesota, must generally conform to the requisites of Minnesota Statutes Sections 549.191 and 549.20.” Ulrich v. City of Crosby, 848 F.Supp. 861, 866 (D.Minn.1994); see also, Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 32 F.3d 1244, 1256 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995); Northwest Airlines v. American Airlines, 870 F.Supp. 1499, 1502 (D.Minn.1994); Security Savings Bank v. Green T…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Bunker v. Kenneth Meshbesher Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd.
Id. (quoting McKenzie, 440 N.W.2d at 184 ); see also Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 32 F.3d 1244, 1255 (8th Cir.1994) (same), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Bunker v. Kenneth Meshbesher
Id. (quoting McKenzie, 440 N.W.2d at 184 ); see also Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 32 F.3d 1244, 1255 (8th Cir. 1994) (same), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Backlund v. City of Duluth
It is well settled that "[i]n the Federal Courts of this District, the pleading of a punitive damage claim, under causes of action premised upon the laws of the State of Minnesota, must generally conform to the requisites of Minnesota Statutes Sections 549.191 and 549.20.” Ulrich v. City of Crosby, 848 F.Supp. 861, 866 (D.Minn.1994); see also, Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 32 F.3d 1244, 1256 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995); Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc., 870 F.Supp. 1499, 1502 (D.Minn.19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soanes v. Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield
See also United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 40-41 (2d Cir.1994) (“[SJimply aiding and abetting a violation is not sufficient to trigger liability----”) (citing Reves, 507 U.S. at 179 , 113 S.Ct. at 1170 ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995).
Keel
v.
North Carolina
v.
North Carolina
No. 94-7876.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1995.
513 U.S. 1198
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. N. C. Cer-tiorari denied.