green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Wesley Ira Purkey
But see United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 899 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 (1997); United States v. McCullah, 76 F.3d 1087, 1111-12 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1213 , 117 S.Ct. 1699 , 137 L.Ed.2d 825 (1997).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Wesley Ira Purkey
But see United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 899 (4th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997); United States v. McCullah, 76 F.3d 1087, 1111-12 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1213 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated February 28, 2002 March 26, 2003 & October 4, 2004
See In re Grand Jury, 103 F.3d 1140, 1145 (3d Cir.) (“Ex parte in camera hearings have been held proper in order to preserve the ongoing interest in grand jury secrecy.”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2412 , 138 L.Ed.2d 177 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 05-3886
See In re Grand Jury, 103 F.3d 1140, 1145 (3d Cir.) (" Ex parte in camera hearings have been held proper in order to preserve the ongoing interest in grand jury secrecy."), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2412 , 138 L.Ed.2d 177 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher P Sianis
See United States v. Perez, No. 00-1875, 2001 WL 1346135, at *1 (8th Cir. Oct. 31, 2001). "[A]n error not argued to the district court is grounds for reversal only if the error 'prejudices the substantial rights of the defendant and would result in a miscarriage of justice if left uncorrected.'" United States v. Beck, 250 F.3d 1163, 1166 (8th Cir. 2001) (quoting United States v. Fountain, 83 F.3d 946, 949 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher P. Sianis
See United States v. Perez, 270 F.3d 737, 738-39 (8th Cir.2001). “[A]n error not argued to the district court is grounds for reversal only if the error ‘prejudices the substantial rights of the defendant and would result in a miscarriage of justice if left uncorrected.’ ” United States v. Beck, 250 F.3d 1163, 1166 (8th Cir.2001) (quoting United States v. Fountain, 83 F.3d 946, 949 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2412 , 138 L.Ed.2d 178 (1997)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Driscoll
See United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 892 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 , 138 L.Ed.2d 179 (1997); United States v. Walker, 910 F.Supp. 837, 856-57 (N.D.N.Y.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edelin
See United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 895-901 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 , 138 L.Ed.2d 179 (1997); United States v. Bradley, 880 F.Supp. 271, 282-92 (M.D.Pa.1994); United States v. Cooper, 754 F.Supp. 617, 621-27 (N.D.Ill.1990) aff’d, 19 F.3d 1154 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. DesAnges, 921 F.Supp. 349, 353-60 (W.D.Va.1996); United States v. Johnson, 1997 WL 534163 (N.D.Ill.1997); United States v. Pitera, 795 F.Supp. 546, 552-70 (E.D.N.Y.1992), affd on other grounds, 986 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Spivey 958 F.Supp. 1523, 1527-36 (D.N.M.…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres
See United States v. McQuilkin, 97 F.3d 723, 729 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997). 3 notified the authorities, and Torres was subsequently arrested.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge Torres, United States of America v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge Torres
See United States v. McQuilkin, 97 F.3d 723, 729 (3d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2413 , 138 L.Ed.2d 178 (1997). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Osorio v. State
(2×)
See Soria v. State, 933 S.W.2d 46, 65 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 , 138 L.Ed.2d 179 (1997) (trial court did not abuse discretion in ruling that form of appellant’s question was improper as an attempt to bind the panel members to considering a particular fact-such as youth, duress, mental or emotional pressure-as mitigating).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hussain
See United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 883 (4th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oles v. State
(2×)
See Soria v. State, 933 S.W.2d 46, 60 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 , 138 L.Ed.2d 179 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Walker, 142 F.3d 103, 113 (2d Cir.) (“aiding and abetting liability [is] available” for CCE-murder), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 896 , 119 S.Ct. 219 , 220, 142 L.Ed.2d 181 (1998); see also United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861 , 898 & n. 18 (4th Cir.1996) (“The alternative means to ‘intentional killing’ that are provided in § 848(e)(1)(A) as elements of the offense *762 simply replicate — for whatever reason— the alternative means, in addition to aiding and abetting, that make one ‘punishable as a principal’ under the generally applicable provisions of 18 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthews
All courts to have considered the use of the term substantial have concluded that it conveys a sufficiently definite “meaning ... to enable the jury to make an objective assessment.” United States v. Flores, 63 F.3d 1342, 1373 (5th Cir.) (and cases cited therein), reh’g denied, 77 F.3d 481 (1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 825 , 117 S.Ct. 87 , 136 L.Ed.2d 43 (1996); see also United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 895-96 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 , 117 S.Ct. 2414 , 138 L.Ed.2d 179 (1997); United States v. McCullah, 76 F.3d 1087, 1110-1111 (10th Cir.), reh’g denied, 87 F.3d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. Holder
(2×)
United States v. Paul, 217 F.3d 989, 1003 (8th Cir. 2000) (holding that "the prosecutor's authority to define non-statutory aggravating factors is a constitutional delegation of Congress's legislative power"); See also United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 895 (4th Cir. 1996)(holding that any delegation of legislative authority was permissible, without deciding whether there was in fact any delegation), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997); United States v. McCullah, 76 F.3d 1087, 1106-07 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1213 (1997). 18 Finally, Allen argues that the FDPA's allowance of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen
United States v. Paul, 217 F.3d 989, 1003 (8th Cir. 2000) (holding that "the prosecutor's authority to define nonstatutory aggravating factors is a constitutional delegation of Congress's legislative power"); See also United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861, 895 (4th Cir. 1996)(holding that any delegation of legislative authority was permissible, without deciding whether there was in fact any delegation), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1253 (1997); United States v. McCullah, 76 F.3d 1087, 1106-07 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1213 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Muchnick
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-1736.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1997.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.