green
Positive treatment
11.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Petersen-Beard
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
The Court opined that a registration act need not be “‘narrowly drawn to accomplish the stated purpose/” so long as “the Act’s nonpunitive purpose is [not] a ‘sham or mere pretext.’ Hendricks, 521 U.S., at 371 (Kennedy, J., concurring).” Smith, 538 U.S. at 103 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See., e.g., Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492 (2d Cir. 1996) [cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S. Ct. 2508 , 138 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Commitment of Rachel
See State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 327 , 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 (1997) (the opportunities to seek supervised release and discharge are sufficient to meet constitutional demands); State v. Carpenter, 197 Wis. 2d 252, 268 , 541 N.W.2d 105 (1995), cert. denied, Schmidt v. Wisconsin, 521 U.S. 1118 (1997) (opportunities for supervised release and discharge "significantly detract" from arguments that Wis. Stat. ch. 980 is unconstitutional).
discussed
Cited "see"
MVM INC. v. Rodriguez
(2×)
See Handicabs, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 95 F.3d 681, 685 (8th Cir.1996) cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997) (providing that employees have the right to discuss work-related problems with their employer’s clients).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Scott
(2×)
See State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , Syl. ถ 3, 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schulpius
(2×)
See State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301 , 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 . 8 ¶ 34.
examined
Cited "see"
Attorney General Opinion No.
(4×)
See K.S.A. 22-4902 . 3 State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 4 269 Kan. 603 , 610 (2000). 5 See State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , 695-96 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 6 265 Kan. 1 (1998). 7 However, any statute which punishes as a crime an act previously committed that was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome punishment for a crime after its commission, or which deprives one charged with a crime of any defense available according to the law at the time when the act was…
discussed
Cited "see"
Aeid v. Bennett
(2×)
See Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 496-97 (2d Cir.1996) cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997)(holding that ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations justified § 2254 habeas relief).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holberg v. State
See State v. Carpenter, 197 Wis.2d 252 , 541 N.W.2d 105 , 112 n. 11 (1995), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2507 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1011 (1997). 9 The legislative history cited by appellant does not persuade us that the Legislature’s actual purpose in enacting Penal Code § 19.03 and Article 37.071 was to advance or inhibit religion.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkinson
See State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669, 676 , 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Monson Trucking, Inc.
(2×)
See Handicabs, Inc. v. NLRB, 95 F.3d 681 , 684 (8th Cir.1996) (summarily enforcing Board’s order where petitioner’s defenses were not urged before Board and, therefore, were barred by § 10(e)), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
NLRB v. Monson Trucking
See Handicabs, Inc. v. NLRB, 95 F.3d 681 , 684 (8th Cir. 1996) (summarily enforcing Board's order where petitioner's defenses were not urged before Board and, therefore, were barred by § 10(e)), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charris v. Artuz
See Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 496-97 (2d Cir.1996) cert. denied — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997)(holding that ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations justified § 2254 habeas relief).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert J. Paters v. United States
(2×)
See Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 497 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997); Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 241 (8th Cir.1995). 18 The district court applied the wrong prejudice analysis in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
Erdheim v. Greiner
See Boria v. Keane, 90 F.3d 36, 37 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 28 .
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Kansas v. Myers, 923 P.2d 1024 (Kan. 1996), cert. denied 117 S.Ct. 2508 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maia v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 494, 497 (2d Cir. 1996) (attorney rendered constitutionally deficient performance by fail- ing to recommend that petitioner accept proffered plea bargain of one to three years, when attorney felt it would be ‘‘suicidal’’ to go to trial, and court ultimately sentenced petitioner to twenty years to life), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S. Ct. 2508 , 138 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soto v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492 , 495–96 (2d Cir. 1996) (in case where trial counsel failed to advise petitioner of slim chance of success at trial, claim of prejudice was reviewed pursuant to Strick- land), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S. Ct. 2508 , 138 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hirschberg
Ed. 2d 164 (2003) ("Because we 'ordinarily defer to the legislature's stated intent,' [citation omitted] '"only the clearest proof" will suffice to override legislative intent and transform what has been denominated a civil remedy into a criminal penalty,' [citations omitted]."); see also State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 (1997) (holding that the legislature's intent in enacting KORA was to create a nonpunitive civil regulatory scheme); Doe v. Thompson, 304 Kan. 291 , 373 P.3d 750 (2016) (upholding Myers' determination that the legislature intended…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ortega-Cadelan
See, e.g., State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669, 700 , 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1118 (1997); see also Churchill v. State, 216 Kan. 399, 399 , 532 *160 P.2d 1070 (1975) (merely stating general rule that constitutional issues are not considered for first time on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Howard
That sworn statement supports his contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see People v Sherk, 269 AD2d 755 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 804 [2000]; see also Boria v Keane, 99 F3d 492, 496-497 [1996], cert denied 521 US 1118 [1997]; United States v Day, 969 F2d 39, 42-44 [1992]) and raises a factual issue that requires a hearing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Mahar
See also Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 497 (2d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 (1997) (acquittal “almost impossible”); United States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 44 (3d Cir. 1992) (likelihood of conviction “overwhelming”).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., Kansas v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997), is one of the earlier examples.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarez v. Keane
(2×)
See Nelson v. Walker, 121 F.3d 828 (2d Cir.1997); see also Boria v. Keane, 90 F.3d 36 (2d Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hussein M. Haekal v. Refco, Inc. And Ronald Von Neefe, Defendants-Respondents, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Tristar Corp. v. Freitas, 84 F.3d 550, 553 (2d Cir.1996), cert, denied, 521 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flores v. Demskie
See also Grady v. Artuz, 931 F.Supp. 1048, 1062 (S.D.N.Y.1996); see also Borla v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 497 (2d Cir.) (applying outcome-determination test to trial counsel performance), clarified on reh’g on other grounds, 90 F.3d 36 (1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bobby v. State
Compare Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1 , 662 A.2d 367 (1995), State v. Ward, 123 Wash.2d 488 , 869 P.2d 1062 (1994), and Doe v. Pataki, 120 F.3d 1263 (2nd Cir.1997) with State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied —— U.S. ——, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997). 4 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Metts v. Miller
See also Boria v. Keane, 90 F.3d 36, 37-38 (2d Cir.1996) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2508 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melnychenko v. 84 Lumber Co.
Compare Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 83 F.3d 118 , 120 (5th Cir. 1996) (same-sex harassment never actionable under Title VII), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2508 (1996) and Garcia v. Elf Atochem N. Am., 28 F.3d 446, 451-452 (5th Cir. 1994), with Wrightson v. Pizza Hut of Am., 99 F.3d 138, 141 (4th Cir. 1996) (“claim under Title VII for same-sex ‘hostile work environment’ harassment may lie where the perpetrator of the sexual harassment is homosexual”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tristar Corp.
v.
Freitas
v.
Freitas
No. 96-577.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.