green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA (Catskill III)
Loon Mountain Recreation Corp. v. Dubois, 521 U.S. 1119 4 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Long Lines Ltd.
See id. (citing Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 842-44 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997), a “pretext” case, in which similar comments were held to be insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination).
cited
Cited "see"
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Norton
See Dubois v. U.S. Dept. of Agric., 102 F.3d 1273, 1286 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Sierra Club, 976 F.2d at 773 . 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sadowski v. Bush
See Federation for American Immigration Reform, Inc. v. Reno, 93 F.3d 897, 901 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997) [hereinafter “FAIR”]. 2 As to the second requirement, the plaintiff has additionally failed to allege any causal connection between the defendant’s alleged failure to enforce the immigration laws and any harm to him.
cited
Cited "see"
Sarah Crone v. UPS
See Ryther v. Kare 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 848 & n.13 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Sarah Crone v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 848 & n. 13 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Ridgeland v. National Park Service
See Dubois v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 102 F.3d 1273, 1294 (1st Cir.1996) (“In contrast to [National Environmental Policy Act’s] focus on process, the [Clean Water Act] is substantive, focusing upon the ‘integrity of the Nation’s Waters, not the permit process.” ’) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997). 123 F.3d at 1152 . 22 These observations apply equally here, and command the conclusion that plaintiffs have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their wetlands-based objections to the FSEIS. *909 Traff…
cited
Cited "see"
Paul R. Yancey v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
See Ryther v. KARE II, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul R. Yancey v. Weyerhaeuser Company, Individually and D/B/A Dequeen & Eastern Railroad Co., Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, *1153 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Sidney Lyles, III v. Curators of the
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (explaining prima facie elements of and shifting burdens in Title VII cases), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Saberliner Corp.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997) Initially, plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination, and if she does so, the burden shifts to defendant who must articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action in order to rebut a presumption of discrimination Breeding v. Arthur J.
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen L. Langlie v. Onan Corporation
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 849 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc) (Loken, J., writing for a majority on this issue), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen L. Langlie v. Onan Corporation
See Ryther v. Kare 11, 108 F.3d 832, 849 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (Loken, J., writing for a majority on this issue), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Eagleview Technologies, Inc. v. MDS Associates
See Isenbergh v. Knight-Ridder Newspaper Sales, Inc., 84 F.3d 1380, 1383 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kristen Dhyne, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Meiners Thriftway, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross
(2×)
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836-38 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bauer v. Metz Baking Co.
See id. (citing Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 842-44 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997), a “pretext” case, in which similar comments were held to be insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination).
cited
Cited "see"
Kristen Dhyne v. Meiners Thriftway
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 (8th Cir. 1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Gregory Scott v. Cty. of Ramsey
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
H & H Brokerage, Inc. v. Vanliner Insurance Company
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); White v. Pence, 961 F.2d 776 , 779 n. 4 (8th Cir.1992) (citing Dace v. ACF Indus., Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375 (8th Cir.1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oleta C. Van Steenburgh v. The Rival Company
See id. (citing Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997)). 8 The 300-day limitations period for Van Steenburgh's claims began on May 3, 1995.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Day v. Sebelius
See, e.g., Federation for American Immigration Reform, Inc. v. Reno, 93 F.3d 897 (D.C.Cir.1996) (immigration reform group lacks standing to challenge government’s scheme for parole and adjustment of Cuban nationals as violation of federal immigration law), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Sadowski v. Bush, 293 F.Supp.2d 15 (D.D.C.2003) (individual lacks standing to challenge government’s failure to fully enforce immigration laws and to allow illegal immigrants into United States); Ridge v. Verity, 715 F.Supp. 1308 (W.D.Pa.1989) (members of U.S. House …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherman v. Kasotakis
Co., 886 F.2d 986, 989 (8th Cir.1989)); see also Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Stephens v. Johnson, 83 F.3d 198, 200 (8th Cir.1996); Haynes v. Bee-Line Trucking Co., 80 F.3d 1235, 1238 (8th Cir.1996); Nelson v. Boatmen’s Bancshares, Inc., 26 F.3d 796 , 800 (8th Cir.1994); McAnally v. Gildersleeve, 16 F.3d 1493, 1500 (8th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Missouri Goodwill Industries
Id.; see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 837 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Hutson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 63 F.3d 771, 777 (8th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Concord Boat v. Brunswick Corp.
A motion for judgment as a matter of law should be granted if, when considering the evidence in this manner, "'without weighing the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.'" McGreevy v. Daktronics, Inc., 156 F.3d 837, 840 (8th Cir. 1998) (citing Sip-Top, Inc., 86 F.3d at 830 ); see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.
A motion for judgment as a matter of law should be granted if, when considering the evidence in this manner, “ ‘without weighing the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.’ ” McGreevy v. Daktronics, Inc., 156 F.3d 837, 840 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Sip-Top, Inc., 86 F.3d at 830 ); see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shamrock Coal Co., Inc. v. Maricle
(2×)
See also, Mullins v. Manning Coal Corporation, Ky., 938 S.W.2d 260 (1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosemary Dodd v. Marvin Runyon, Secretary, United States Postal Service
See id; see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 837 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (stating that the elements of the prima facie case of discrimination combined with evidence of pretext may permit a jury to find for the plaintiff), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc.
See id. at 515 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ; see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 838 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997). 5 On careful consideration of the evidence presented in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, we agree with the district court that Russell has failed to offer sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable juror to conclude that Russell's race was a motivating factor in the decisions by the Wearhouse to deny him promotions and ultimately to demote him.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kneibert v. Thomson Newspapers
We announced as the rule in this Circuit that an age-discrimination plaintiff can avoid summary judgment only if "the evidence considered in its entirety (1) creates a fact issue as to whether the employer's proffered reasons are pretextual and (2) creates a reasonable inference that age was a determinative factor in the adverse employment decision." Id. at 1336-37 ; see also Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 837-38 (Lay, majority) and 848 (Loken, dissenting) (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997) (adopting Rothmeier as the rule of this …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mullins
v.
Manning Coal Corp.
v.
Manning Coal Corp.
No. 96-1657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.