Newman v. Worcester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 521 U.S. 1122 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Newman v. Worcester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 521 U.S. 1122 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (56 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jesse Garcia v. State (texapp, 2007-09-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jesse Garcia v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Shiflet v. State, 732 S.W.2d 622, 628 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985); see Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 505 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 138 L.
cited Cited "see" Jesse Garcia v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Shiflet v. State , 732 S.W.2d 622, 628 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985); see Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 505 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 138 L.
cited Cited "see" Jesse Garcia v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Shiflet v. State , 732 S.W.2d 622, 628 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985); see Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 505 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 138 L.
discussed Cited "see" Garcia v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Shiflet v. State, 732 S.W.2d 622, 628 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); see Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 505 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997) (Fourth Amendment case).
cited Cited "see" Ex Parte Boyd
Tex. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997); Ex parte Banks, 769 S.W.2d 539, 540 (Tex.Crim.App.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Hughes v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 506 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997); West v. State, 720 S.W.2d 511, 517 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1072 , 107 S.Ct. 2470 , 95 L.Ed.2d 878 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte Washington
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court held that under the facts of the case, the police officer “acted under color of law and was, therefore, a member of the prosecution team in the investigation of the instant case and as such his knowledge of the perjured testimony was imputable to the prosecution.” Id. at 485 ; see also Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370 , 372 n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (“Due process prohibits prosecutors from presenting testimony that any member of the ‘prosecution team,’ including both investigative and prosecuto-rial personnel, knows to be false.”), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 25…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lemasurier v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. 33.1(a)(1)(A); Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 265 ; Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); see also Fierro v. State, 706 S.W.2d 310, 317-18 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997) (a general objection is not sufficient to apprise trial court of complaint urged and thus preserves nothing for review).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. 33.1(a)(1)(A); Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 265 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (op. on reh'g), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1466 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999); Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex. Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); see also Fierro v. State, 706 S.W.2d 310, 317-18 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997) (a general objection is not sufficient to apprise trial court of complaint urged and thus preserves nothing for review).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Anderson v. State, 932 S.W.2d 502, 508 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997); McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 498-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997); Eldridge v. State, 940 S.W.2d 646, 652-53 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bragg v. Norris
E.D. Ark. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Antone, 603 F.2d 566, 569 (5th Cir.1979); see United States, v. Meros, 866 F.2d 1304 (11th Cir.1989); see also Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 521 U.S. 1122 , 117 S.Ct. 2517 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1997)(Due process prohibits prosecutors from presenting testimony that any member of the prosecution team, including investigating and prosecutorial personnel, knows to be false).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newman et ux.
v.
Worcester County Department of Social Services
No. 96-1846.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
521 U.S. 1122
Published

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.